2009/4/9 Stefan Dösinger ste...@codeweavers.com:
+hr = IWineD3DDevice_SetIndices(This-wineD3DDevice, This-indexbuffer,
+ WINED3DFMT_R16_UINT /* d3d7 uses uints
*/);
The comment is inconsistent with the code (and probably redundant to
begin with).
2009/4/9 Stefan Dösinger ste...@codeweavers.com:
@@ -197,7 +197,6 @@ static HRESULT WINAPI
IDirect3DVertexBuffer9Impl_GetDesc(LPDIRECT3DVERTEXBUFFER9
pDesc-Usage = desc.Usage;
pDesc-Pool = desc.Pool;
pDesc-Size = desc.Size;
-pDesc-FVF = desc.FVF;
Ge van Geldorp wrote:
Try 2: Add buffer overflow tests
Changelog:
secur32/tests: Add simple tests for GetUserNameExA/W()
---
dlls/secur32/tests/secur32.c | 86
++
1 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Hi Ge,
The tests show a big list
Installed variable has always the same value. What about removing it instead ?
Bye,
Christian
Message du 09/04/09 07:10
De : Rein Klazes
A : wine-patches
Copie à :
Objet : win87em: always return that a 8087 coprocessor is present. (try 2)
---
dlls/win87em.dll16/win87em.c | 2 +-
1
Am Donnerstag, 9. April 2009 09:34:22 schrieb Henri Verbeet:
2009/4/9 Stefan Dösinger ste...@codeweavers.com:
@@ -197,7 +197,6 @@ static HRESULT WINAPI
IDirect3DVertexBuffer9Impl_GetDesc(LPDIRECT3DVERTEXBUFFER9 pDesc-Usage =
desc.Usage;
pDesc-Pool = desc.Pool;
Paul Vriens wrote:
And the subject of the mail should be a bit more than just
advapi32/tests.
Oops, sry. Read the second mail after resending in the patch
containing your first suggestions.
But I'm a bit confused about the meaning of todo_wine.
todo_wine discards output from failed tests, if I
Am Donnerstag, 9. April 2009 01:47:33 schrieb Tobias Jakobi:
Fixed patch according to stefand's suggestions.
Please disregard the old one and use this patch instead.
Looks ok to me I guess
Andreas Rosenberg wrote:
Paul Vriens wrote:
And the subject of the mail should be a bit more than just
advapi32/tests.
Oops, sry. Read the second mail after resending in the patch
containing your first suggestions.
But I'm a bit confused about the meaning of todo_wine.
todo_wine discards
Hi Paul,
From: Paul Vriens [mailto:paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com]
Ge van Geldorp wrote:
Try 2: Add buffer overflow tests
Changelog:
secur32/tests: Add simple tests for GetUserNameExA/W()
---
dlls/secur32/tests/secur32.c | 86
++
1
Thanks for the clarification about todo_wine, Paul
Paul Vriens wrote:
Well I don't think it will be accepted as is. We usually don't add
functions that are not used anywhere especially when the comments say
that there is a bug elsewhere that should be fixed first.
Well, I was thinking about
Has anyone else noticed
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:History_Of_WineAppDB.gif
which is shown on the right side of
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wine_(software) ?
It's kind of cool. Hats off to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Estemi
who put it together.
- Dan
On Di, 2009-03-17 at 15:56 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
You will probably find graphedt.exe from the microsoft sdk useful,
A GPL alternative exists, but does not work in Wine yet:
http://blog.monogram.sk/janos/tools/monogram-graphstudio/
--
By by ... Detlef
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 3:41 AM, Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com wrote:
2) we don't have a stable stable (sic) of machines
running the tests
So what constitutes a stable machine?
I wasn't complaining about unstable machines;
I was complaining that the set of machines reporting test
Has anyone else noticed
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:History_Of_WineAppDB.gif
which is shown on the right side of
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wine_(software) ?
It's kind of cool. Hats off to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Estemi
who put it together.
- Dan
Yes that is
Dan Kegel wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 3:41 AM, Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com wrote:
2) we don't have a stable stable (sic) of machines
running the tests
So what constitutes a stable machine?
I wasn't complaining about unstable machines;
I was complaining that the set of machines
Hello everybody...
My patch to add advanced d3d settings in winecfg is almost ready.
In fact, i only have to figure out how to detect video memory size to
display it when no key is set to force it or to reset. Stefan D told
me to use DirectDraw, but i wouldn't find.
So that is the last thing
2009/4/8 James Hawkins trui...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 1:05 PM, AllenDavidNiven
allendavidni...@globalfone.biz wrote:
who can i pay to make this on the wine that i have
is $100 ok ?
That's generous of you, but also humorous. I can't remember the last
estimate we had of how much
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 3:54 AM, Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com wrote:
I wasn't complaining about unstable machines;
I was complaining that the set of machines reporting test
results varies.
Ok, got it. So how do we come up with a stable set?
My suggestion for that was:
2) omit
Paul Vriens wrote:
Dan Kegel wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 3:41 AM, Paul Vriens
paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com wrote:
2) we don't have a stable stable (sic) of machines
running the tests
So what constitutes a stable machine?
I wasn't complaining about unstable machines;
I was complaining that
2009/4/9 Scott Ritchie sc...@open-vote.org:
Joel Holdsworth wrote:
Has anyone else noticed
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:History_Of_WineAppDB.gif
which is shown on the right side of
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wine_(software) ?
It's kind of cool. Hats off to
2009/4/9 Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com:
(This was last discussed in February, e.g.
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-February/073060.html )
The results on test.winehq.org seem more variable than one
would expect, which makes it harder to gauge wine's progress.
I can think of two
(This was last discussed in February, e.g.
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-February/073060.html )
The results on test.winehq.org seem more variable than one
would expect, which makes it harder to gauge wine's progress.
I can think of two sources of noise:
1) 32 and 64 bit results
2009/4/9 Joel Holdsworth j...@airwebreathe.org.uk:
Has anyone else noticed
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:History_Of_WineAppDB.gif
which is shown on the right side of
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wine_(software) ?
It's kind of cool. Hats off to
Joel Holdsworth wrote:
Has anyone else noticed
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:History_Of_WineAppDB.gif
which is shown on the right side of
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wine_(software) ?
It's kind of cool. Hats off to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Estemi
who put it together.
-
Andreas Rosenberg wrote:
Added a test to verify result of LookupAccountSid
The test fails here:
security.c:1599: Test failed: LookupAccountSidA() Expected account name:
paul got: INTERACTIVE
I guess this is the
Dan Kegel wrote:
(This was last discussed in February, e.g.
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-February/073060.html )
The results on test.winehq.org seem more variable than one
would expect, which makes it harder to gauge wine's progress.
I can think of two sources of noise:
1) 32
Hi,
I would like to know what's the status on the TaskDialog implementation
in Wine based on the code I gave to Dan Kegel months ago.
Relevant threads:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2008-October/069724.html
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2008-October/069800.html
Hi Warren,
Everything works well and i would like some feedback.
+if (!strcmp(buf, enabled))
+CheckDlgButton(dialog, IDC_D3D_MULTISAMPLING, BST_CHECKED);
+else
+CheckDlgButton(dialog, IDC_D3D_MULTISAMPLING, BST_UNCHECKED);
+HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(), 0, buf);
The
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Rob Shearman robertshear...@gmail.com wrote:
Removing these two sources of noise might be as simple as
1) omit 64 bit results, and
Not a bad idea, but I would suggest classifying these machines as a
different category (I would suggest other for the moment)
Rob Shearman robertshear...@gmail.com writes:
2009/4/9 Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com:
(This was last discussed in February, e.g.
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-February/073060.html )
The results on test.winehq.org seem more variable than one
would expect, which makes it harder
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org wrote:
Having the 64-bit results in the same platform group as the 32-bit ones
is actually very helpful, it makes comparing them a lot easier. I don't
think we want to split them.
But suppressing or splitting the results
Dan Kegel wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org wrote:
Having the 64-bit results in the same platform group as the 32-bit ones
is actually very helpful, it makes comparing them a lot easier. I don't
think we want to split them.
But suppressing or
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com wrote:
But suppressing or splitting the results from machines
that don't have a full set of results shouldn't hurt...
How many runs should have a box have before it's considered for the 'stable'
list? We have 2 months
Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com writes:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org
wrote:
Having the 64-bit results in the same platform group as the 32-bit ones
is actually very helpful, it makes comparing them a lot easier. I don't
think we want to split them.
But
The problem with the current arrangement is that when machines pop in and
out, any failures that are more likely on those machines also pop in and
out, so error counts fluctuate, which obscures the smaller changes due to
wine fixes or regressions.
I like the current output, and don't want to
Dragon Naturally Speaking crashes after prolonged use, but the amount of time
one can use it before it crashes crept up about 2 minutes, using today's git.
Today I dictated for about 14 minutes until it crashed.
That's progress.
Susan
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
The problem with the current arrangement is that when machines pop in and
out, any failures that are more likely on those machines also pop in and
out, so error counts fluctuate, which obscures the smaller changes due to
wine
2009/4/9 Juan Lang juan.l...@gmail.com:
Hi Warren,
Everything works well and i would like some feedback.
+ if (!strcmp(buf, enabled))
+ CheckDlgButton(dialog, IDC_D3D_MULTISAMPLING, BST_CHECKED);
+ else
+ CheckDlgButton(dialog, IDC_D3D_MULTISAMPLING, BST_UNCHECKED);
+
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Warren Dumortier nwarre...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everybody...
My patch to add advanced d3d settings in winecfg is almost ready.
In fact, i only have to figure out how to detect video memory size to
display it when no key is set to force it or to reset. Stefan
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Warren Dumortier nwarre...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everybody...
My patch to add advanced d3d settings in winecfg is almost ready.
In fact, i only have to figure out how to detect video
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 1:05 PM, AllenDavidNiven
AllenDavidNiven at globalfone.biz wrote:
who can i pay to make this on the wine that i have
is $100 ok ?
That's generous of you, but also humorous. I can't remember the last
estimate we had of how much work it would take, but it's on the order
--- On Thu, 4/9/09, Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: possible NULL dereference?
To: Joris Huizer joris_hui...@yahoo.com
Cc: wine-devel@winehq.org
Date: Thursday, April 9, 2009, 7:53 AM
Joris Huizer wrote:
Looking at
Hallo,
I tried to run Alexander Morozov's patches against wine-git with libusb and
ftd2x devices.
Two remarks:
- The files from ftp://ftp.etersoft.ru/pub/people/amorozov/usb/current/ miss
lines in configure.ac to trigger the Makefile generation for usbd.sys and
usbhub.sys.
- The HardwareID in
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:29 PM, EA Durbin ead1...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 1:05 PM, AllenDavidNiven
AllenDavidNiven at globalfone.biz wrote:
who can i pay to make this on the wine that i have
is $100 ok ?
That's generous of you, but also humorous. I can't remember the last
2009/4/9 EA Durbin ead1...@hotmail.com:
After all we don't want to vastly increase our potential customer base and
potentially get several $70 per crossover professional license or $40 per
standard license fees, but rather wait until someone writes a hefty check to
port it up front.
You're
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Nicolas Le Cam niko.le...@gmail.com wrote:
Try2: This time with the patch.
Tested on Win2k/WinXP. Marked two tests as todo_wine.
If you're having to add todo_wine, then you're changing the current
tests, which is bad if all you're trying to do is handle another
46 matches
Mail list logo
