On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Ben Klein wrote:
[...]
But his bug raises an interesting issue. If an application has sanity
checks on FAT32 vs NTFS (e.g., I need a 4GB file ... I've detected no
NTFS therefore it's FAT32 which doesn't support more than 2GB files),
Then the application is buggy: NTFS is
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009, Chris Robinson wrote:
[...]
Available fs mount points:
/ - /dev/sda3
/home - /dev/sda4
/boot - /dev/sda1
/mnt/cdrom - /dev/hda1
Matching mount points that /home/user/.wine/drive_c exists in and are active:
/
/home
Mount point with the longest name:
/home
Thus,
Frans Kool wrote:
You're mixing tabs and spaces.
--
Cheers,
Paul.
Jesse Allen ha scritto:
What about other drivers? Is the DIB driver going to know how to
handle the others then?
The engine act as a filter between gdi32 and the DISPLAY driver, other stuffs
are untouched.
The changes on gdi32 are just to prefere the loading of the engine instead of
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:19:05 +0200 (CEST)
Francois Gouget fgou...@free.fr wrote:
Maybe the DVD Shrink author would agree to do this change if asked?
Development of DVD Shrink was halted in 2005 due to DMCA issues.
--
Rosanne DiMesio dime...@earthlink.net
Jeremy Newman wrote:
I changed the text question on the signup page. That should help a little.
Well that didn't help for long.
Vitaliy.
André Hentschel wrote:
This is needed to bring up IE8. Otherwise there is a Backtrace:
=0 0x7e80198d SHDefExtractIconW+0x7d(pszIconFile=0x32e310, iIndex=0,
uFlags=0, phiconLarge=(nil), phiconSmall=0x32e30c, nIconSize=1048592)
---
dlls/shell32/iconcache.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 2:19 AM, Francois Gouget fgou...@free.fr wrote:
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Ben Klein wrote:
[...]
But his bug raises an interesting issue. If an application has sanity
checks on FAT32 vs NTFS (e.g., I need a 4GB file ... I've detected no
NTFS therefore it's FAT32 which
Ok, corrected that.
But where to go with the test case? create a new testfile for iconcache?
Nikolay Sivov schrieb:
André Hentschel wrote:
This is needed to bring up IE8. Otherwise there is a Backtrace:
=0 0x7e80198d SHDefExtractIconW+0x7d(pszIconFile=0x32e310, iIndex=0,
uFlags=0,
André Hentschel wrote:
Ok, corrected that.
But where to go with the test case? create a new testfile for iconcache?
Sure, why not, if no relevant file exists already to place it in.
2009/4/16 Francois Gouget fgou...@free.fr:
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, Ben Klein wrote:
But his bug raises an interesting issue. If an application has sanity
checks on FAT32 vs NTFS (e.g., I need a 4GB file ... I've detected no
NTFS therefore it's FAT32 which doesn't support more than 2GB files),
Austin English wrote:
Testing for bug 18071. Passes under Wine/2k.
We bail out on pObjectName being NULL:
+if (!pObjectName || !ppSecurityDescriptor) return
ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER;
+
This means this if()
Paul Vriens wrote:
Austin English wrote:
Testing for bug 18071. Passes under Wine/2k.
We bail out on pObjectName being NULL:
+if (!pObjectName || !ppSecurityDescriptor) return
ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER;
+
This
Ubuntu 9.04's new notification system is really nice and non obtrusive,
however it can still get in the way if you need the entire screen.
Accordingly, the notifications system has been designed to not draw
notifications when a program such as a movie player is telling the
operating system to
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:44:30AM -0700, Scott Ritchie wrote:
Ubuntu 9.04's new notification system is really nice and non obtrusive,
however it can still get in the way if you need the entire screen.
Accordingly, the notifications system has been designed to not draw
notifications when a
2009/4/16 Scott Ritchie sc...@open-vote.org:
Ubuntu 9.04's new notification system is really nice and non obtrusive,
however it can still get in the way if you need the entire screen.
Accordingly, the notifications system has been designed to not draw
notifications when a program such as a
A user submitted a bug report to launchpad complaining that the Wine
icon is not Tango compliant:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine/+bug/358645
So, what is Tango Compliance? Well, the Tango icons all use a set of
design standards, and you can find them here:
2009/4/15 Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com:
Two chromium unit tests reported phony errors
when run on wine on valgrind because
RtlAllocateHeap sometimes returned an
allocation without notifying valgrind about it.
RtlReAllocateHeap is also missing valgrind notifications for the large
block paths. It
I mentioned this issue before - and I agree. Personally I'm interested
in good integration across the whole of Wine - this includes for example
the icons which appear in the file dialogs. ReactOS have adopted Tango
to great effect.
The downside is that there's really no way of making Wine's icons
2009/4/17 Scott Ritchie sc...@open-vote.org:
A user submitted a bug report to launchpad complaining that the Wine icon is
not Tango compliant:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine/+bug/358645
So, what is Tango Compliance? Well, the Tango icons all use a set of design
standards,
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:19 AM, Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com wrote:
Seems like a lot of fuss over a few trivial details:
1) The Wine system icon is ugly (I'm all in favour of changing it, but
you make a BIG fuss over it)
2) If the icon is changed, it should be done in time for Ubuntu 9.10.
Scott Ritchie wrote:
Meanwhile, I'll try drumming up some artists to see if I can get a few
different Tango-compliant icons for us to chose from.
Apparently my work has already been done! There are some beautiful
icons originally made for Ubuntu Studio that have give me everything I
asked
On Mi, 2009-04-15 at 13:37 +0200, Paul Vriens wrote:
The lstrcpyW and lstrcatW additions to init() in the tests don't work on
Win95. I guess that's where the new failures come from:
I removed a broken(hres == VARCMP_GT), and that's what
VarCmp on your w95 machine returned.
My second Patch
On Mi, 2009-04-15 at 10:13 +0300, Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
I just have struck one tool related to Windows printer drivers [*]:
[*] http://unixwiz.net/tools/winprinfo.html
Thanks for your Post.
I know that tool, but i wrote my own API test tool before I found
winprinfo.
My tool allows me to
The Ubuntu Studio logos look fine.
I'd be happy with adopting them if they really make Wine
fit in better with modern desktops. No need to wait for 1.2,
just check 'em in now, 1.2 will be along soon enough.
If it is mostly automated spam, it might help to try and confuse the
scripts by inserting traps for them that users can't see (fields
hidden via CSS, etc...)
http://jkroon.blogs.uls.co.za/it/spam/ahead-of-the-spammers-for-once
Human spammers are a totally different issue... And most solutions
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
The Ubuntu Studio logos look fine.
I'd be happy with adopting them if they really make Wine
fit in better with modern desktops. No need to wait for 1.2,
just check 'em in now, 1.2 will be along soon enough.
+1
--
-Austin
2009/4/17 Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
The Ubuntu Studio logos look fine.
I'd be happy with adopting them if they really make Wine
fit in better with modern desktops. No need to wait for 1.2,
just check 'em in now,
n Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Guy Albertelli galbe...@neo.rr.com wrote:
mountmgr.sys uses a specific format for unique volume name. Make
GetVolumeNameForVolumeMountPointW match that format for the returned
unique volume name.
Changelog
- Make GetVolumeNameForVolumeMountPointW match
29 matches
Mail list logo
