2009/6/7 Frank Richter frank.rich...@gmail.com:
On 07.06.2009 22:22, Henri Verbeet wrote:
Even if the format isn't lockable, you can still use the data with a
shader.
If it's a typical depth format the shader will see normalized values.
Yes, but floating point formats aren't typical.
Michael Martin martinm...@hotmail.com wrote:
The following patch fixes 18130. In my tests, context menu for
the Edit window control does not send the WM_COMMAND message.
Please comment.
And what is the reason of the crash? Please add a test case
replicating the problem first, only then start
2009. 06. 7, vasárnap keltezéssel 19.44-kor Stefan Dösinger ezt írta:
Am 07.06.2009 um 10:35 schrieb Henri Verbeet:
2009/6/7 Frank Richter frank.rich...@gmail.com:
As far as I could gather DF16 is the ATI way of getting a
renderable
16 bit depth texture.
Without knowing much about
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Mikołaj Zalewski miko...@zalewski.pl writes:
It's online again. Having it on WineHQ would probably give a better
uptime (and a much better latency, but this should also improve on my
side, when I won't need a temporary SSH tunnel anymore and will move
the HTTP server
Vincent Povirk vinc...@codeweavers.com writes:
--- a/tools/wine.inf.in
+++ b/tools/wine.inf.in
@@ -123,6 +123,8 @@ HKCR,.xml,Content Type,2,text/xml
HKCR,.xsl,Content Type,2,text/xsl
HKCR,chm.file,,2,Compiled HTML Help File
HKCR,chm.file\shell\open\command,,2,%11%\hh.exe %1
Ken Sharp wrote:
Disregard first patch.. this one makes a little more sense.
Ken Sharp wrote:
See Bug 7976. Apparently this has already been done.
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 16:57 +0200, Paul Vriens wrote:
We have that same (or actually newer) page on the wiki:
http://wiki.winehq.org/Fun_Projects
Doesn't it make more sense to link this entire page to the wiki?
I think it does. But it would be great if someone can
spend a bit of time on
Am 07.06.2009 um 23:34 schrieb Henri Verbeet:
Ok, I guess the format could just be named badly, although Chris makes
a good point about precision, even if the values are normalized.
There's D3DFMT_D24FS8 in the standard d3d formats, so I guess if they
just wanted to make it a float format
Paul Vriens schrieb:
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Mikołaj Zalewski miko...@zalewski.pl writes:
It's online again. Having it on WineHQ would probably give a better
uptime (and a much better latency, but this should also improve on my
side, when I won't need a temporary SSH tunnel anymore and
André Hentschel wrote:
Vista turns the (WCHAR)1234 into a (unsigned char)1234.
This causes error on vista machinesSP2:
http://test.winehq.org/data/7aeffc442cc1b9a454f1ff7d7b3175b4bba88b05/vista_esx-wvistaadm/riched20:editor.html
editor.c:3249: Test failed: EM_GETPASSWORDCHAR returned Ò (210)
Users are editing their posts when asked for terminal output/wine
version/etc. Those of us on the mailing list side don't get this
information.
--
-Austin
I recently filed http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18734 in which I
showed that DlgDirList is behaving incorrectly for 16-bit apps. I also
included a test program compiled with the Watcom C compiler, as well as
a patch. Then a comment appeared saying that it should be possible to
create a
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Alex Villacís
Lassoa_villa...@palosanto.com wrote:
I recently filed http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18734 in which I
showed that DlgDirList is behaving incorrectly for 16-bit apps. I also
included a test program compiled with the Watcom C compiler, as
Austin English escribió:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Alex Villacís
Lassoa_villa...@palosanto.com wrote:
I recently filed http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18734 in which I
showed that DlgDirList is behaving incorrectly for 16-bit apps. I also
included a test program compiled with
I've tested this on XP, but I would like to get somebody to test on 9x and
maybe even vista please and thank you. These tests are the prelude to
cursoricon patches including Griswold's animated cursors themed cursors and
my fixes for LOTRO (mostly handling invalid calls properly).
Thanks,
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Alex Villacís
Lassoa_villa...@palosanto.com wrote:
I downloaded the tests from win16test.googlecode.com , but the tarball
already has a small backlog of patches that have not yet been integrated
into Wine (checked with patch --dry-run). Why? I could make a
André Hentschel wrote:
Paul Vriens schrieb:
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Mikołaj Zalewski miko...@zalewski.pl writes:
It's online again. Having it on WineHQ would probably give a better
uptime (and a much better latency, but this should also improve on my
side, when I won't need a temporary
Steven Edwards winehac...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Alex Villacís
Lassoa_villa...@palosanto.com wrote:
I downloaded the tests from win16test.googlecode.com , but the tarball
already has a small backlog of patches that have not yet been integrated
into Wine (checked
Did we find out what the regression is for 1.1.23 that caused the ATI
and other non NVIDIA cards to start failing?
Chris
Ask them to put it in a new post?
On 2009-06-09, Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
Users are editing their posts when asked for terminal output/wine
version/etc. Those of us on the mailing list side don't get this
information.
--
-Austin
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Ben Kleinshackl...@gmail.com wrote:
Ask them to put it in a new post?
On 2009-06-09, Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
Users are editing their posts when asked for terminal output/wine
version/etc. Those of us on the mailing list side don't get this
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 14:41:57 -0500
Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
Users are editing their posts when asked for terminal output/wine
version/etc. Those of us on the mailing list side don't get this
information.
+1
It's not quite as big a problem for those of us who use the
Howdy all,
Doing some testing with PuTTY, I've noticed some strange behavior.
I've got windows XP in a VM, and when comparing behavior to Wine, I
noticed some inconsistencies with respect to the '0.0.0.0' invalid
address.
Windows:
Putty - 0.0.0.0: throws an error Network error: Cannot assign
FWIW, using Windows ping.exe under Wine:
Pinging 0.0.0.0 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=64
Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=64
Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=64
Reply from 127.0.0.1: bytes=32 time1ms TTL=64
Ping statistics for 0.0.0.0:
2009/6/9 Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com:
ping (in cmd.exe):
D:\appinstallping 0.0.0.0
Pinging 0.0.0.0 with 32 bytes of data:
Destination specified is invalid.
Destination specified is invalid.
Destination specified is invalid.
Destination specified is invalid.
Ping statistics
See also
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/07/msg7.html
I kind of doubt it will ever make it in to ubuntu.
When I tried building win16 binaries with the Linux version,
there were lots of path problems. That was two years ago,
but I wouldn't be surprised if they're still there.
These
2009/6/9 Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com:
Users are editing their posts when asked for terminal output/wine
version/etc. Those of us on the mailing list side don't get this
information.
Maybe just add notice on edit page stating that edits are for minor
changes only, and if one has some
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Igor Tarasovtarasov.i...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/6/9 Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com:
Users are editing their posts when asked for terminal output/wine
version/etc. Those of us on the mailing list side don't get this
information.
Maybe just add notice on
Igor Tarasov tarasov.i...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/6/9 Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com:
Users are editing their posts when asked for terminal output/wine
version/etc. Those of us on the mailing list side don't get this
information.
Maybe just add notice on edit page stating that edits
Alex Villacís Lasso a_villa...@palosanto.com wrote:
I recently filed http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18734 in which I showed that DlgDirList is behaving
incorrectly for 16-bit apps. I also included a test program compiled with the Watcom C compiler, as well as a patch.
Then a comment
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Ben Kleinshackl...@gmail.com wrote:
Seems to me to be a bug, i.e., Wine shouldn't be able to use 0.0.0.0.
It seems that we're simply passing this on to the host os, which is
then routing it back to localhost. Perhaps we need to catch 0.0.0.0 as
a special case
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Austin English austinengl...@gmail.comwrote:
...
I'm not sure Wine should be a special case if it's not breaking apps.
While that's arguable , Putty can give a demonstratable corner case
that has behavior different on Windows than on Wine, and it's entirely
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Erich Hooverehoo...@mines.edu wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com
wrote:
...
I'm not sure Wine should be a special case if it's not breaking apps.
While that's arguable , Putty can give a demonstratable corner case
33 matches
Mail list logo
