Re: opengl32: get rid of glext.h

2009-06-11 Thread Detlef Riekenberg
On Mi, 2009-06-10 at 21:56 +0200, Roderick Colenbrander wrote: -#ifdef HAVE_GL_GLEXT_H -# include GL/glext.h -#endif The same code is used in winex11.drv/opengl.c Can this also be removed? When that's the case, then GL/glext.h can be removed from AC_CHECK_HEADERS in configure.ac -- By by

Which virtualization software should I choose

2009-06-11 Thread Paul Vriens
Hi, Just upgraded to Fedora 11 and (yet again) having issues with VMware Workstation. VMware still doesn't support Fedora (as a host) and I'm tired of fixing/patching things, again and again. I need to run several Windows versions (95 up to Vista for now) for our winetest and I really

Re: opengl32: get rid of glext.h

2009-06-11 Thread Roderick Colenbrander
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Detlef Riekenbergwine@web.de wrote: On Mi, 2009-06-10 at 21:56 +0200, Roderick Colenbrander wrote: -#ifdef HAVE_GL_GLEXT_H -# include GL/glext.h -#endif The same code is used in winex11.drv/opengl.c Can this also be removed? When that's the case,

Re: Which virtualization software should I choose

2009-06-11 Thread Nicolas Le Cam
2009/6/11 Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com: Hi, Just upgraded to Fedora 11 and (yet again) having issues with VMware Workstation. VMware still doesn't support Fedora (as a host) and I'm tired of fixing/patching things, again and again. I need to run several Windows versions (95 up

Re: Fix incorrect check in WCMD_HandleTildaModifiers().

2009-06-11 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com writes: = '0' || = '9' always is true. :-) This patch fixes it, and avoids two just hand coded checks altogether. Gerald ChangeLog: Fix incorrect check in WCMD_HandleTildaModifiers(). Use isdigit() instead of hand-coding this check. Using isdigit() on a

Re: winemenubuilder: generate new menus in the right directory

2009-06-11 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Damjan Jovanovic damjan@gmail.com writes: @@ -882,7 +882,11 @@ static BOOL write_menu_file(const char *filename) while (1) { +char *tmpdir = getenv(TMPDIR); +unsetenv(TMPDIR); tempfilename = tempnam(xdg_config_dir, _wine); +if (tmpdir) +

Re: Which virtualization software should I choose

2009-06-11 Thread Michael Stefaniuc
Paul Vriens wrote: Just upgraded to Fedora 11 and (yet again) having issues with VMware Workstation. VMware still doesn't support Fedora (as a host) and I'm tired of fixing/patching things, again and again. I need to run several Windows versions (95 up to Vista for now) for our winetest

Re: [Bugzilla]: Refuse to accept comments with big number of logs / back traces

2009-06-11 Thread Ken Sharp
I must have missed this. This would be incredibly useful. Does this affect all users though? Anastasius Focht would probably go over these limits but his comments are helpful. Vitaliy Margolen wrote: Vitaliy Margolen wrote: The limits are: 20 lines for logs (fixme, trace, err, warn) 10

Re: [Bugzilla]: Refuse to accept comments with big number of logs / back traces

2009-06-11 Thread Nikolay Sivov
Ken Sharp wrote: I must have missed this. This would be incredibly useful. Does this affect all users though? Anastasius Focht would probably go over these limits but his comments are helpful. Vitaliy Margolen wrote: Vitaliy Margolen wrote: The limits are: 20 lines for logs (fixme,

Re: [Bugzilla]: Refuse to accept comments with big number of logs / back traces

2009-06-11 Thread Ken Sharp
Nikolay Sivov wrote: What is the purpose of that change? To reduce mailed amount or what? To improve readability of reports? Log quotation are very useful sometimes and this blocking only makes things harder for people who knows what they're pasting.

Re: [Bugzilla]: Refuse to accept comments with big number of logs / back traces

2009-06-11 Thread Nikolay Sivov
Ken Sharp wrote: Nikolay Sivov wrote: What is the purpose of that change? To reduce mailed amount or what? To improve readability of reports? Log quotation are very useful sometimes and this blocking only makes things harder for people who knows what they're pasting.

Re: Which virtualization software should I choose

2009-06-11 Thread Paul Vriens
On 06/11/2009 11:30 AM, Nicolas Le Cam wrote: 2009/6/11 Paul Vrienspaul.vriens.w...@gmail.com: Hi, Just upgraded to Fedora 11 and (yet again) having issues with VMware Workstation. VMware still doesn't support Fedora (as a host) and I'm tired of fixing/patching things, again and again. I

Re: [Bugzilla]: Refuse to accept comments with big number of logs / back traces

2009-06-11 Thread Rein Klazes
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:30:57 +0400, you wrote: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5 There's nothing about why it's so important. These 25, 35 or 20 lines to allow means nothing. Actually I don't see any problem here, and, yes, I'm subscribed on wine-bugs list and this full log pasting

Re: Which virtualization software should I choose

2009-06-11 Thread Nicolas Le Cam
2009/6/11 Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com: On 06/11/2009 11:30 AM, Nicolas Le Cam wrote: 2009/6/11 Paul Vrienspaul.vriens.w...@gmail.com: Hi, Just upgraded to Fedora 11 and (yet again) having issues with VMware Workstation. VMware still doesn't support Fedora (as a host) and I'm

Re: Which virtualization software should I choose

2009-06-11 Thread David Gerard
2009/6/11 Michael Stefaniuc mstef...@redhat.com: Paul Vriens wrote: I need to run several Windows versions (95 up to Vista for now) for our winetest and I really like the snapshot possibilities of VMware. Suggestions, recommendations? I'm using KVM/Qemu with libvirt aka virt-manager. I have

Re: [Bugzilla]: Refuse to accept comments with big number of logs / back traces

2009-06-11 Thread Vitaliy Margolen
Rein Klazes wrote: On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:30:57 +0400, you wrote: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5 There's nothing about why it's so important. These 25, 35 or 20 lines to allow means nothing. Actually I don't see any problem here, and, yes, I'm subscribed on wine-bugs list

Re: Which virtualization software should I choose

2009-06-11 Thread Austin English
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:58 AM, David Gerarddger...@gmail.com wrote: VirtualBox does okay for Windows and Linux, barely for FreeBSD with lots of caveats and not really for anything else. Notably, OpenBSD doesn't work and the VirtualBox developers admit it but consider the bug beneath their

Re: [Bugzilla]: Refuse to accept comments with big number of logs / back traces

2009-06-11 Thread Austin English
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Ken Sharpkennyb...@o2.co.uk wrote: Attachments can be deleted, can comments be deleted? No. They're archived all over the interwebs anyway, there is no point. I support this patch. -- -Austin

Re: Which virtualization software should I choose

2009-06-11 Thread Paul Vriens
On 06/11/2009 02:58 PM, David Gerard wrote: 2009/6/11 Michael Stefaniucmstef...@redhat.com: Paul Vriens wrote: I need to run several Windows versions (95 up to Vista for now) for our winetest and I really like the snapshot possibilities of VMware. Suggestions, recommendations? I'm using

Re: Which virtualization software should I choose

2009-06-11 Thread David Gerard
2009/6/11 Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com: The problem with both VirtualBox and QEMU/KVM seems to be supporting older Windows versions as guests ( NT4). Yeah. Try QEMU without KVM on a very fast host machine, your ancient Windows should run just as well as it would on a 486 ;-) - d.

Re: Which virtualization software should I choose

2009-06-11 Thread David Gerard
2009/6/11 Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com: On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:58 AM, David Gerarddger...@gmail.com wrote: VirtualBox does okay for Windows and Linux, barely for FreeBSD with lots of caveats and not really for anything else. Notably, OpenBSD doesn't work and the VirtualBox

Re: Which virtualization software should I choose

2009-06-11 Thread Austin English
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:22 AM, David Gerarddger...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/6/11 Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com: On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:58 AM, David Gerarddger...@gmail.com wrote: VirtualBox does okay for Windows and Linux, barely for FreeBSD with lots of caveats and not really for

Fwd: RDo we still need the regression test for 1.1.23 ?

2009-06-11 Thread Danila Sentiabov
Forwarding to mailing list... -- Forwarded message -- From: Danila Sentiabov dsent@gmail.com Date: Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 23:02 Subject: Re: RDo we still need the regression test for 1.1.23 ? To: chris ahrendt celtich...@yahoo.com I didn't follow the topic, but as far as I

Re: advpack: Implement ExtractFilesW [try 2]

2009-06-11 Thread James Hawkins
2009/6/11 Vladimir Pankratov script...@mail.ru: Hello all. Implemented ExtractFilesW Changed files:  advpack/files.c +if (GetFileAttributesA(ExpandDir) == INVALID_FILE_ATTRIBUTES) +return HRESULT_FROM_WIN32(ERROR_PATH_NOT_FOUND); Why are you testing this in ExtractFilesA?

Re: Disable forum edits

2009-06-11 Thread Austin English
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Dmitry Timoshkovdmi...@codeweavers.com wrote: Igor Tarasov tarasov.i...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/6/9 Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com: Users are editing their posts when asked for terminal output/wine version/etc. Those of us on the mailing list side don't

Re: RDo we still need the regression test for 1.1.23 ?

2009-06-11 Thread Ben Klein
2009/6/11 chris ahrendt celtich...@yahoo.com: to see what patch caused the failure on non NVIDIA cards? Where's the rest of your message? Oh, I see, it's in the subject. Wasn't there already a thread about this? Back on topic, if it is definitely a regression then a regression test on

Re: Which virtualization software should I choose

2009-06-11 Thread Ben Klein
2009/6/11 Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com: Just installed VirtualBox and it does have snaphots but not so extensive as VMware. In VMware I have some W2K snapshots: - out-of-the-box - SP1 - SP2 - SP3 - SP4 + Windows Update I can freely choose which I want to go to. Not so with

Re: RDo we still need the regression test for 1.1.23 ?

2009-06-11 Thread Ben Klein
2009/6/12 chris ahrendt celtich...@yahoo.com: Ben Klein wrote: 2009/6/11 chris ahrendt celtich...@yahoo.com: to see what patch caused the failure on non NVIDIA cards? Where's the rest of your message? Oh, I see, it's in the subject. Wasn't there already a thread about this? Back on

OS X build broken

2009-06-11 Thread Austin English
AJ, looks like your 'configure: Detect the appropriate form for the __ASM_GLOBAL_FUNC macro.' patch broke the compile on OS X. Could you have a look? gcc -m32 -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -D__WINESRC__ -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing

Re: Alexandre Julliard : configure: Detect the appropriate form for the __ASM_GLOBAL_FUNC macro.

2009-06-11 Thread Steven Edwards
Hi, On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Alexandre Julliardjulli...@winehq.org wrote: Module: wine Branch: master Commit: 857f1e0924f23865038a608ee6834ef524371f20 URL:     http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commit;h=857f1e0924f23865038a608ee6834ef524371f20 Author: Alexandre Julliard

Re: OS X build broken

2009-06-11 Thread Steven Edwards
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Austin Englishaustinengl...@gmail.com wrote: AJ, looks like your 'configure: Detect the appropriate form for the __ASM_GLOBAL_FUNC macro.' patch broke the compile on OS X. Could you have a look? Bah you beat me reporting this by 13mins! :P -- Steven Edwards