On Thursday 11 June 2009 14:58:14 David Gerard wrote:
VMWare is reputedly better - it's the oldest common VM software and
its emulation is very seasoned, well-tested and robust.
If you discount that last I checked, VMware still couldn't do IPv6 in their
virtual networks, and every single
Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com writes:
AJ, looks like your 'configure: Detect the appropriate form for the
__ASM_GLOBAL_FUNC macro.' patch broke the compile on OS X. Could you
have a look?
It works fine here. What does your __ASM_GLOBAL_FUNC macro look like in
include/config.h?
--
In dlls/ntdll/file.c: line 362
if ((status = server_get_unix_fd( fileio-io.handle, FILE_READ_DATA, fd,
needs_close, NULL, NULL )))
break;
Is this if always true?
_
MSN
2009/6/12 LiuYuanxi marsliu2...@hotmail.com:
In dlls/ntdll/file.c: line 362
if ((status = server_get_unix_fd( fileio-io.handle, FILE_READ_DATA, fd,
needs_close, NULL, NULL )))
break;
Is this if always true?
No, only if
2009/6/12 Kai Blin kai.b...@gmail.com:
On Thursday 11 June 2009 14:58:14 David Gerard wrote:
VMWare is reputedly better - it's the oldest common VM software and
its emulation is very seasoned, well-tested and robust.
If you discount that last I checked, VMware still couldn't do IPv6 in their
Kai Blin wrote:
On Thursday 11 June 2009 14:58:14 David Gerard wrote:
VMWare is reputedly better - it's the oldest common VM software and
its emulation is very seasoned, well-tested and robust.
If you discount that last I checked, VMware still couldn't do IPv6 in their
virtual networks, and
Paul Vriens wrote:
The problem with both VirtualBox and QEMU/KVM seems to be supporting
older Windows versions as guests ( NT4).
I don't understand VirtualBox says it supports up to Windows 7 and I
have XP running. I have had QEMU/KVM running XP. What annoyed me about
VMWare Server was the
Jeff Latimer wrote:
Paul Vriens wrote:
The problem with both VirtualBox and QEMU/KVM seems to be supporting
older Windows versions as guests ( NT4).
I don't understand VirtualBox says it supports up to Windows 7 and I
have XP running. I have had QEMU/KVM running XP. What annoyed me about
On Do, 2009-06-11 at 11:16 -0400, Steven Edwards wrote:
+expand [-r] source destination\n
+expand -r source [destination]\n
+expand -D source.cab [-F:Files]\n
+expand source.cab -F:files destination\n
+\n
+ -rRename expanded files.\n
+
On Do, 2009-06-11 at 20:52 +0200, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
+
+if (wEventId SHCNE_ASSOCCHANGED)
+{
+TRACE(refreshing file type associations);
+RefreshFileTypeAssociations();
+}
\n is missing in the TRACE.
The helper function looks like an API call.
Please use
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 4:12 AM, Alexandre Julliardjulli...@winehq.org wrote:
Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com writes:
AJ, looks like your 'configure: Detect the appropriate form for the
__ASM_GLOBAL_FUNC macro.' patch broke the compile on OS X. Could you
have a look?
It works fine
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Austin Englishaustinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
AJ, looks like your 'configure: Detect the appropriate form for the
__ASM_GLOBAL_FUNC macro.' patch broke the compile on OS X. Could you
have a look?
gcc -m32 -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
---
dlls/user32/message.c |2 +
dlls/user32/tests/msg.c | 54 +++
server/queue.c | 10 +++-
3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Hi Dmitry,
These new tests introduce some failures on
Editing disabled.
-Newman
Austin English wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Dmitry Timoshkovdmi...@codeweavers.com wrote:
Igor Tarasov tarasov.i...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/6/9 Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com:
Users are editing their posts when asked for terminal output/wine
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Jeremy Newmanjnew...@codeweavers.com wrote:
Editing disabled.
-Newman
Thanks!
--
-Austin
Subject: Re: Disable forum edits
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Jeremy Newmanjnew...@codeweavers.com wrote:
Editing disabled.
-Newman
Thanks!
+1
James
configure: WARNING: mach-o/dyld_images.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: mach-o/dyld_images.h: check for missing prerequisite
headers?
configure: WARNING: mach-o/dyld_images.h: see the Autoconf documentation
configure: WARNING: mach-o/dyld_images.h: section Present But
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Paul Vrienspaul.vriens.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
---
dlls/user32/message.c | 2 +
dlls/user32/tests/msg.c | 54
+++
server/queue.c | 10 +++-
3 files changed, 65
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Noah Fieldsnqe...@gmail.com wrote:
configure: WARNING: mach-o/dyld_images.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: mach-o/dyld_images.h: check for missing prerequisite
headers?
configure: WARNING: mach-o/dyld_images.h: see the Autoconf
19 matches
Mail list logo
