Am Sunday 19 July 2009 23:01:08 schrieb Henri Verbeet:
+const char *debug_src(struct shader_reg *reg, BOOL vs) {
+static char buffer[128];
+
+memset(buffer, 0, sizeof(buffer));
This really isn't acceptable:
Note that I think your mentor should have caught basic things like
Am Monday 20 July 2009 01:38:35 schrieb Matteo Bruni:
2009/7/19 Henri Verbeet hverb...@gmail.com:
2009/7/19 Matteo Bruni matteo.myst...@gmail.com:
+const char *debug_src(struct shader_reg *reg, BOOL vs) {
+ static char buffer[128];
+
+ memset(buffer, 0, sizeof(buffer));
-
Scott Ritchie wrote:
So, briefly:
Over the past few months, users have added an average of between 12 and
14 bugs every day.
Since June 1st:
- 412 total bugs filed
- 87 bugs resolved invalid
- 227 bugs resolved fixed
- 133 bugs confirmed but not resolved (status new)
- 292 bugs
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 06:16, Austin Englishaustinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
I need a portable way to get to the shared documents folder, e.g.,:
Windows XP:
C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Shared Documents
WIndows Vista:
C:\users\Public\Public Documents
Wine:
C:\users\Public\Documents
André Hentschel n...@dawncrow.de writes:
--- a/dlls/dsound/propset.c
+++ b/dlls/dsound/propset.c
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static HRESULT WINAPI IKsBufferPropertySetImpl_Get(
S(prop).Set = *guidPropSet;
S(prop).Id = dwPropID;
S(prop).Flags = 0; /* unused */
-
2009/7/20 Matteo Bruni matteo.myst...@gmail.com:
That function, in particular, should really be into asmparser.c and
not be visible from outside. Then the wine_dbg_sprintf() function
comes really handy in this situation, I didn't know it. Note also that
this debug_src function is used just to
2009/7/20 Stefan Dösinger ste...@codeweavers.com:
+scissor.top = 0;
+scissor.left = 0;
+scissor.right = viewport.Width;
+scissor.bottom = viewport.Height;
+IWineD3DDevice_SetScissorRect(iface, scissor);
+IWineD3DDeviceImpl_MarkStateDirty(This,
Mike Kaplinskiy wrote:
Paul (and anyone who can test on x86_64):
Can you confirm that the new patch gives no failures?
Mike.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 2:02 AM, Paul Vrienspaul.vriens.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Mike Kaplinskiy wrote:
Paul,
Does the attached fix test failures on at least NT4? The
Stefan Leichter stefan.leich...@camline.com writes:
+/* Wait a while. The following test also does a CreateService for the
+ * same servicename and this would result in an
ERROR_SERVICE_MARKED_FOR_DELETE
+ * error if we do this to quick. Vista seems more picky then the others.
+
2009/7/20 Luis C. Busquets Pérez luis.busqu...@ilidium.com:
I read several months ago that the itnetion was to create the assembler
inside the wined3d and then use its functionality inside the diverse d3dx9
implementations. Has this changed? I think it was Stefan Dösinger sho
proposed it:
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Emmanuel Maillardmaha...@free.fr wrote:
But it's an external appplication, your desktop environment, that handle
*.desktop file; wine just generate them...
As per the private email I sent. I could see that working if we can
convince Alexandre of the need of an
Am Monday 20 July 2009 12:58:16 schrieb Henri Verbeet:
The MarkStateDirty() call looks redundant to me. Also, does this do
the right thing when we're recording a stateblock?
It's not redundant because the scissor rect needs updating on a RT switch
anyway - I think it wasn't visible in this
2009/7/20 Stefan Dösinger ste...@codeweavers.com:
Am Monday 20 July 2009 12:58:16 schrieb Henri Verbeet:
The MarkStateDirty() call looks redundant to me. Also, does this do
the right thing when we're recording a stateblock?
It's not redundant because the scissor rect needs updating on a RT
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Emmanuel Maillardmaha...@free.fr wrote:
But it's an external appplication, your desktop environment, that handle
*.desktop file; wine just generate them...
As per the private email I sent. I could see that working if we can
convince Alexandre of the need of an
From: Dmitry Timoshkov dmi...@codeweavers.com
F Capela fabio.cap...@yahoo.com wrote:
XkbSetDetectableAutoRepeat is not working correctly on some
distributions, including Ubuntu 9.04. In practical terms, this
means programs running under Wine on such distros are unable to
ignore
Hi André,
@@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ static UCHAR NetBTinetResolve(const UCHAR name[NCBNAMSZ],
(*cacheEntry)-numAddresses = i;
for (i = 0; i (*cacheEntry)-numAddresses; i++)
(*cacheEntry)-addresses[i] =
-
2009/7/20 Henri Verbeet hverb...@gmail.com:
2009/7/20 Matteo Bruni matteo.myst...@gmail.com:
That function, in particular, should really be into asmparser.c and
not be visible from outside. Then the wine_dbg_sprintf() function
comes really handy in this situation, I didn't know it. Note also
2009/7/20 Matteo Bruni matteo.myst...@gmail.com:
2009/7/20 Henri Verbeet hverb...@gmail.com:
Yeah, but you can treat the debug output just like another
asmparser_backend. That would mean calling the parser twice when
debugging, but that should be ok. You can do something similar on the
Le 20 juil. 09 à 15:34, Steven Edwards a écrit :
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Emmanuel Maillardmaha...@free.fr
wrote:
But it's an external appplication, your desktop environment, that
handle
*.desktop file; wine just generate them...
As per the private email I sent. I could see that
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Yuri Khanyurivk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 06:16, Austin Englishaustinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
I need a portable way to get to the shared documents folder, e.g.,:
Windows XP:
C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Shared Documents
WIndows Vista:
Am Monday 20 July 2009 20:33:44 schrieb Henri Verbeet:
While in principle this is right, as many functions are indeed very
similar, this won't be pretty practically, even excluding that some
instructions really need special treatment.
One more thing comes to my mind here: The assembler
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Scott Ritchiesc...@open-vote.org wrote:
Mozilla are farthest on the game here, as they were working on writing
some of their own custom stuff based on OpenID, however that then deals
with the need of having each app support an OpenID login.
I'm not sure if
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Steven Edwardswinehac...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Scott Ritchiesc...@open-vote.org wrote:
I'm not sure if it's a good idea, but there may be some merit in having
one of the accounts function as an OpenID Provider and then have the
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Sparrspa...@gmail.com wrote:
Was the contempt for OpenID in general, or the idea of using an
existing third party as an OpenID providers? Although it would be
against the spirit of OpenID, it would be possible for one WineHQ
service to provide OpenID only to
Paul,
I don't like NT4 anymore. We're breaking up.
Does the attached patch fix the latest failures (not counting the
build warnings)?
Mike.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Paul Vrienspaul.vriens.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Mike Kaplinskiy wrote:
Paul (and anyone who can test on x86_64):
Can
25 matches
Mail list logo
