On 10/06/2009 09:32 PM, Jacek Caban wrote:
Hi Paul,
Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi Jacek,
I've been looking at the tests reports and we seem to have a few
spurious errors:
http://test.winehq.org/data/tests/urlmon:protocol.html
The ones I mean are:
protocol.c:2535: Testing http protocol (direct
2009/10/6 Roderick Colenbrander thunderbir...@gmail.com:
+static XRENDERINFO alloc_xrenderinfo()
That's not a prototype.
I'm not entirely sure how strict winex11.drv is about this, but it
seems to me that if alloc_xrenderinfo() can return NULL, the calling
code should be able to handle that as
2009/10/6 Roderick Colenbrander thunderbir...@gmail.com:
+if(!physDev-xrender)
+alloc_xrenderinfo(physDev);
This doesn't match what alloc_xrenderinfo() in your previous patch
does. Note that the compiler would have returned an error here if
alloc_xrenderinfo() had a proper prototype.
Hi,
We currently have advapi32\eventlog.c that deals with event logging
related functions.
I somebody (i.e. me) would like to start working on the event tracing
functions should these go to eventtrace.c or be combined with eventlog.c?
Same question for the tests of course.
--
Cheers,
Dan Kegel wrote:
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Detlef Riekenberg wine@web.de wrote:
Code, which is called very often, should produce as less overhead as
possible. I suggest to use static inline.
I have 'static' already. The compiler's probably better at
deciding when to use inline
Hi Paul,
Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi Jacek,
The second one never happened on any of my boxes. I'm also not able to
reproduce the first failure. As said, it happens intermittently and,
so it seems, only when running winetest?
I do see two boxes (Jeff's Vista box and Aurimas's XP box) that
Hi Roderick,
Roderick Colenbrander wrote:
Hi,
This is an updated version which uses a proper function prototype for
alloc_xrenderinfo. Further it checks whether the function succeeded in
XRender_SelectFont.
EnterCriticalSection(xrender_cs);
-if(!physDev-xrender) {
-
On 10/07/2009 11:37 AM, Jacek Caban wrote:
I was able to reproduce the cookie failure by setting cookies for
winehq.org. I've sent a patch. The other problem remains.
Thanks for looking into that.
--
Cheers,
Paul.
Francois Gouget fgou...@free.fr writes:
I did not take the extra step of renaming WIN16_CreateSystemTimer() to
CreateSystemTimer(), CreateSystemTimer16() or something else as the
naming convention was not clear to me. Also, it's possible the
CreateSystemTimer() prototype in
Ge van Geldorp ggeld...@vmware.com writes:
Changelog:
kernel32/tests: Save last error before calling lstrcmpA() since it may
reset GLE
It would be better to split the tests, first check length and last
error, then check string contents.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com writes:
I found it illogical to advertise unusable 8bit formats. But I did not
cross check whether MS-Windows would do so.
Please do, and then if they are really not needed remove them, don't
leave them commented out with no explanation.
Is it supported to
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
Your code handle different parameter for the attr functions.
Is it possible, that code, which is compiled for one ABI version can
call the implementation of the other ABI version?
Not sure I follow. Can you rephrase that?
I
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 6:59 AM, Steven Edwards winehac...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know if this is what Detlef means but I think the attr
functions and structures differ slightly on other Unixen. At least I
am pretty sure they differ enough on OS X from Linux or Solaris to
cause problems.
Hi Dan,
On Oct 7, 2009, at 9:24 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
Yeah, the patch handles OS X [...]
Tangentially related to this xattr issue, are you aware of BSD's
chflags system call and the st_flags field of struct stat? On Mac OS
X (and any other BSD which defines UF_HIDDEN),
Is it possible to run more than 1 version of wineserver concurrently?
-Nick
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Ken Thomases k...@codeweavers.com wrote:
Tangentially related to this xattr issue, are you aware of BSD's chflags
system call and the st_flags field of struct stat? On Mac OS X (and any
other BSD which defines UF_HIDDEN), FILE_ATTRIBUTE_HIDDEN is better
On Oct 7, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Nicholas LaRoche wrote:
Is it possible to run more than 1 version of wineserver concurrently?
If each is referencing a different WINEPREFIX, yes.
Cheers,
Ken
On Oct 7, 2009, at 11:46 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Ken Thomases k...@codeweavers.com
wrote:
It would also be good to check for UF_IMMUTABLE|SF_IMMUTABLE to
determine
FILE_ATTRIBUTE_READONLY, and set UF_IMMUTABLE when setting
FILE_ATTRIBUTE_READONLY, although
André Hentschel wrote:
---
dlls/comctl32/tests/Makefile.in |1 +
dlls/comctl32/tests/theming.c | 235 +++
2 files changed, 236 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 dlls/comctl32/tests/theming.c
Hi, Andre.
+#ifdef __i386__
+#define
Nikolay Sivov schrieb:
André Hentschel wrote:
---
dlls/comctl32/tests/Makefile.in |1 +
dlls/comctl32/tests/theming.c | 235
+++
2 files changed, 236 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 dlls/comctl32/tests/theming.c
Hi, Andre.
André Hentschel wrote:
Nikolay Sivov schrieb:
André Hentschel wrote:
---
dlls/comctl32/tests/Makefile.in |1 +
dlls/comctl32/tests/theming.c | 235
+++
2 files changed, 236 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644
Nikolay Sivov schrieb:
André Hentschel wrote:
Nikolay Sivov schrieb:
André Hentschel wrote:
---
dlls/comctl32/tests/Makefile.in |1 +
dlls/comctl32/tests/theming.c | 235
+++
2 files changed, 236 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create
André Hentschel wrote:
Nikolay Sivov schrieb:
We already have this stuff defined in v6util.h. No reason to
duplicate I
suppose.
My reason is, that the compiler warns that i am not using the
functions inside v6util.h when i use it.
Sorry, don't follow you. Does
Ah, I see, no, it won't link I think without static. Some time ago I
thought about adding v6util.c back and move code here, I'm not very
familiar with makefile generation but I think we could place this new
v6util.c into C_SRCS section of test makefile (if it's allowed of
course, but I think
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Julius Schwartzenberg julius.schwartzenb...@gmail.com wrote:
This obviously won't work for 64-bit. I'd suggest to make extra
2 * sizeof(void *). and add a comment about compatibility.
ok(cls.cbWndExtra sizeof(void *), blah ...\n) doesn't require
any intermediate
2009/10/7 Nicholas LaRoche nlaro...@vt.edu:
Is it possible to run more than 1 version of wineserver concurrently?
You can run more than one instance from a given version of Wine - set
the WINEPREFIX accordingly. (CrossOver has good support for this,
calling it bottles.).
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:20 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
I suppose you could run different versions of Wine if you needed to by
a similar process, e.g.
WINEPREFIX=/home/user/.wine101 /usr/bin/wine app1.exe
WINEPREFIX=/home/user/.wine1130 ~/wine/wine app2.exe
Yes, you can.
Julius Schwartzenberg julius.schwartzenb...@gmail.com wrote:
static const WCHAR editW[] = {'E','d','i','t',0};
+#ifdef _WIN64
+#define EDIT_EXTRA_VALUE sizeof(EDITSTATE *)
+#else
+#define EDIT_EXTRA_VALUE 6 /* This has to be 6 for 32-bit, otherwise
Civilization II crashes, bug #2181 */
Dmitry Timoshkov dmi...@codeweavers.com wrote:
+#ifdef _WIN64
+ok(cls.cbWndExtra == 8, expected 6, got %d\n, cls.cbWndExtra);
+#else
+ok(cls.cbWndExtra == 6, expected 6, got %d\n, cls.cbWndExtra);
+#endif
+}
+}
You should check the return value of GetClassInfoEx() and put
Another month, another winetricks.
A half-dozen new verbs and lots of updates, too.
And oddly, winetricks is starting to become useful on Windows.
(What can I say? I develop on Windows, too, and I missed
winetricks there.)
Updates since 20090913:
* added mozillabuild, vcexpress2005sp1
*
30 matches
Mail list logo
