On 17 February 2010 00:28, Stefan Dösinger ste...@codeweavers.com wrote:
No, the pipeline part that would implement this(vertex) should set a state
handler that prints a WARN for each defined but unimplemented stage.
Sure, but that doesn't mean you can't catch undefined states as well.
E.g.
Hi! Please comment on try 2 of the patch. Will you accept it?
IB Hi! This should expose this bug:
IB http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19385 ( the 'wine start'
IB launcher does not open MS Office documents that have spaces in their
IB path ). Although the title is misleading, many other
On 02/17/2010 09:51 AM, Ilya Basin wrote:
Hi! Please comment on try 2 of the patch. Will you accept it?
IB +/* ensure tmpdir is in %TEMP%: GetTempPath() can succeed even if TEMP
is undefined */
IB +SetEnvironmentVariableA(TEMP, fileA);
I'm still not convinced you need this but I
On 02/16/2010 01:25 AM, Hwang YunSong(황윤성) wrote:
I append patch file
http://www.dreamwiz.com/ http://www.dreamwiz.com/
http://dreamwiz.gmarket.co.kr/redirect2.dwz?http://www.gmarket.co.kr/challenge/neo_event/today_event/today_event_main.asp?jaehuid=20891
Detlef Riekenberg wine@web.de writes:
@@ -905,6 +905,7 @@ HKLM,%CurrentVersionNT%\Ports,COM1:,2,9600,n,8,1
HKLM,%CurrentVersionNT%\Ports,COM2:,2,9600,n,8,1
HKLM,%CurrentVersionNT%\Ports,COM3:,2,9600,n,8,1
HKLM,%CurrentVersionNT%\Ports,COM4:,2,9600,n,8,1
Henri Verbeet a écrit :
On 17 February 2010 00:28, Stefan Dösinger ste...@codeweavers.com wrote:
No, the pipeline part that would implement this(vertex) should set a state
handler that prints a WARN for each defined but unimplemented stage.
Sure, but that doesn't mean you can't catch
On 17 February 2010 11:47, Christian Costa titan.co...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
It should use debugstr_an() in the first place. You could have a go at
splitting it into separate lines if needed after that, but I can't
think of a whole lot of cases where the comments are really useful.
On 17 February 2010 11:47, Christian Costa titan.co...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
I'm not much of a fan of the whole let's disable the scary debug
output idea, especially since now the function becomes invisible
after the first call for people doing actual debugging, unless you run
with +relay.
There are not scary but uselessly noisy.
Having to much redondant messages doesn't help unless traces are enabled.
I can always display the fixme when traces are enable if it suits you.
Henri Verbeet a écrit :
On 17 February 2010 11:47, Christian Costa titan.co...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
I'm not
Henri Verbeet a écrit :
On 17 February 2010 11:47, Christian Costa titan.co...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
It should use debugstr_an() in the first place. You could have a go at
splitting it into separate lines if needed after that, but I can't
think of a whole lot of cases where the comments are
PV On 02/17/2010 09:51 AM, Ilya Basin wrote:
Hi! Please comment on try 2 of the patch. Will you accept it?
IB +/* ensure tmpdir is in %TEMP%: GetTempPath() can succeed even if
TEMP is undefined */
IB +SetEnvironmentVariableA(TEMP, fileA);
PV I'm still not convinced you need this
On 17 February 2010 13:22, Christian Costa titan.co...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
I don't see your point using debugstr_an. My code does all the needed job.
It's unvalidated external data, special characters should be escaped.
Wrt comments, having displayed the comments that explain the assembly code
Hi,
While I have no 64bit system, I recently submitted a compilation
job to WTB and saw dozens of warnings unknown to me so far,
mostly about printf format strings. The reason for the warnings
is that WTB compiles in 64 bit mode, while I only know 32bit systems.
Is there anything us 32bit users
Wrt comments, having displayed the comments that explain the assembly code
is not uninteresting at all imo. I'm tempted to keep then displayed.
I have *never* used the comments to fixed a bug, or seen particularly
interesting ones, for that matter. Regardless, if it works for you
that's
joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com writes:
More specifically, regarding format strings, I'm unsure
whether it's actually possible to find %d/%ld formats that work
on both systems for all types one comes across (UINT, MMRESULT etc.)
What's the receipe?
All Win32 types are the same across
On 02/17/2010 05:06 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com writes:
More specifically, regarding format strings, I'm unsure
whether it's actually possible to find %d/%ld formats that work
on both systems for all types one comes across (UINT, MMRESULT etc.)
What's the
2010/2/16 André Hentschel n...@dawncrow.de
Just some ideas by me:
Dan Kegel schrieb:
Seth Shelnutt wrote:
I am wondering what that status of patchwatcher is?
It's waiting around for somebody to have time to start it
up again. It's ugly code, written in shell and perl, which
On 2/17/2010 23:32, Seth Shelnutt wrote:
2010/2/16 André Hentschel n...@dawncrow.de mailto:n...@dawncrow.de
Just some ideas by me:
Dan Kegel schrieb:
Seth Shelnutt wrote:
I am wondering what that status of patchwatcher is?
It's waiting around for somebody to
On Mi, 2010-02-17 at 11:15 +0100, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Detlef Riekenberg wine@web.de writes:
@@ -905,6 +905,7 @@ HKLM,%CurrentVersionNT%\Ports,COM1:,2,9600,n,8,1
HKLM,%CurrentVersionNT%\Ports,COM2:,2,9600,n,8,1
HKLM,%CurrentVersionNT%\Ports,COM3:,2,9600,n,8,1
Detlef Riekenberg wine@web.de writes:
On Mi, 2010-02-17 at 11:15 +0100, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Detlef Riekenberg wine@web.de writes:
@@ -905,6 +905,7 @@ HKLM,%CurrentVersionNT%\Ports,COM1:,2,9600,n,8,1
HKLM,%CurrentVersionNT%\Ports,COM2:,2,9600,n,8,1
20 matches
Mail list logo
