2010/6/11 Dmitry Timoshkov dmi...@codeweavers.com:
Frédéric Delanoy frederic.dela...@gmail.com wrote:
I see this patch has been Rejected in
http://source.winehq.org/patches/, but I just wondered why:
- are the UTF8 resources not preferred over custom codepages?
- or is the patch simply too
Le 10/06/2010 23:38, Austin English a écrit :
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Peter Daviesultra...@gmail.com wrote:
Some tests crash for me (eg.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22903 segfaults). This means I
can't run the entire test suite with make test, what should I do?
On 06/11/2010 08:38 AM, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
2010/6/11 Dmitry Timoshkovdmi...@codeweavers.com:
Frédéric Delanoyfrederic.dela...@gmail.com wrote:
I see this patch has been Rejected in
http://source.winehq.org/patches/, but I just wondered why:
- are the UTF8 resources not preferred over
Le 11/06/2010 03:52, James McKenzie a écrit :
How can I get OLDER information on patches from previous releases?
You should have a look at http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo.
Everything is archived (patches submitted, commits and of course this
mailing list)
It's very useful when someone
Am 11.06.2010 um 04:59 schrieb James McKenzie:
Stefan Dösinger wrote:
It wasn't intended as an objection. It was mostly curiosity, because we have
no test in d3d9 that checks for similar behavior, and trying to actually use
such a shader for rendering would be somewhat odd.
It might be
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Maarten Lankhorst
m.b.lankho...@gmail.com wrote:
Is snd_pcm_recover the only function missing? If so change it to dlsym, and
add a copy of snd_pcm_recover to wine if it cannot find the libalsa one..
Is it a problem to eschew the use of dlsym? It feels like
Hello Andrew,
On 11-06-10 10:18, Andrew Nguyen wrote:
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Maarten Lankhorst
m.b.lankho...@gmail.com wrote:
Is snd_pcm_recover the only function missing? If so change it to dlsym, and
add a copy of snd_pcm_recover to wine if it cannot find the libalsa one..
Hey,
Sorry I didn't mean any offence caused. It's just I saw that the new wine
release is going to fix bugs and tried to bring it to your attention.
I saw the guy Will Tipton in that bug ticket provided a detailed analysis of
the problem so it looked easy since you already would know the
On 11 Jun 2010, at 02:42, David Hedberg david.hedb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm having some trouble with this simple patch. Specifically, it
breaks compiling of dlls/actxprxy, producing the message:
*
/home/david/Projects/wine/git/dlls/actxprxy/actxprxy_shobjidl_p.c:
6507:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Maarten Lankhorst
m.b.lankho...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Andrew,
On 11-06-10 10:18, Andrew Nguyen wrote:
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Maarten Lankhorst
m.b.lankho...@gmail.com wrote:
Is snd_pcm_recover the only function missing? If so change it to dlsym,
Hi,
I'm wondering if my patch (62325) hasn't been reviewed yet or if you
expect a strict error-free patch.
Indeed, http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/62325.testfail shows a No
test summary line found for WNT4WSSP6.
If it's an issue, how to fix it ?
Thanks
Nikolay Sivov nsi...@codeweavers.com writes:
From fb4317a2a39475c225fe04946795892c4891cd26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nikolay Sivov nsi...@codeweavers.com
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 01:42:06 +0400
Subject: [PATCH] CreateFontIndirectEx implementation on top of
CreateFontIndirect
It should
On 06/11/2010 11:42 AM, GOUJON Alexandre wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering if my patch (62325) hasn't been reviewed yet or if you
expect a strict error-free patch.
Indeed, http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/62325.testfail shows a No
test summary line found for WNT4WSSP6.
If it's an issue, how to fix
On 6/11/2010 09:30, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Igor Paliychukigor-...@mail.ru wrote:
Updating Ukrainian translations to kernel32(ukr.nls).
file : ukrainian-kernel32-ukr-nls.patch
You forgot to mention what's wrong with current ukr.nls.
I asked Igor to update genitive months names,
Le 11/06/2010 11:58, Paul Vriens a écrit :
Those are the results from the testbot:
I know, I received the log by mail and I submitted my patch before
sending it to wine-patches but I didn't understand it as an error.
This means this new test is crashing on (that) NT4.
WNT4WSSP6.log
On 06/11/2010 01:13 PM, GOUJON Alexandre wrote:
Le 11/06/2010 11:58, Paul Vriens a écrit :
Those are the results from the testbot:
I know, I received the log by mail and I submitted my patch before
sending it to wine-patches but I didn't understand it as an error.
This means this new test is
On 11 Jun 2010, at 12:17, David Hedberg david.hedb...@gmail.com wrote:
---
dlls/actxprxy/usrmarshal.c | 21 +
include/shobjidl.idl | 30 ++
2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/actxprxy/usrmarshal.c
On 06/11/2010 01:20 PM, Paul Vriens wrote:
On 06/11/2010 01:13 PM, GOUJON Alexandre wrote:
Le 11/06/2010 11:58, Paul Vriens a écrit :
Those are the results from the testbot:
I know, I received the log by mail and I submitted my patch before
sending it to wine-patches but I didn't understand
Le 11/06/2010 13:54, Paul Vriens a écrit :
I don't know if you have an account on the testbot so I tested it for
you:
I submitted [to wineTestBot] my patch before sending it to wine-patches
But many thanks for your help !!!
In that case, we have to use broken(), haven't we ?
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:52 PM, velociraptor Genjix
aphi...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hey,
Please look into this issue,
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15118
It seems like a fairly trivial fix which renders this application useless. A
detailed description of the implementation needed is
Hi,
Jan Hoogenraad wrote:
Each debugging request for wine states that I should remove all winetricks.
AppDB should request something similar: minimal use of winetricks.
However I have no way to tell, and no way to safely remove them.
IMHO one solution to your problem is to learn to use different
On 06/11/2010 02:19 PM, GOUJON Alexandre wrote:
Le 11/06/2010 13:54, Paul Vriens a écrit :
I don't know if you have an account on the testbot so I tested it for
you:
I submitted [to wineTestBot] my patch before sending it to wine-patches
But many thanks for your help !!!
In that case, we have
Nikolay Sivov nsi...@codeweavers.com writes:
try2: function body moved to *Ex call, and CreateFontIndirect use it.
You should also print FIXMEs if the ignored data is used by the app.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org
How do I get the test suite to report it success rate (as a whole) in
a %d tests executed (%d marked as todo, %d %s), %d skipped.\n style.
Peter
On 06/11/2010 08:43 PM, Peter Davies wrote:
How do I get the test suite to report it success rate (as a whole) in
a %d tests executed (%d marked as todo, %d %s), %d skipped.\n style.
Peter
I guess the only way is to parse the report file yourself. The current
'parser' only calculates per
Am 11.06.2010 20:43, schrieb Peter Davies:
How do I get the test suite to report it success rate (as a whole) in
a %d tests executed (%d marked as todo, %d %s), %d skipped.\n style.
Peter
%d tests executed will be a huge number!
--
Best Regards, André Hentschel
Is it a legal requirement that everyone working on WINE must be a
complete arsehole, or just a project requirement?
Nye
Hi,
demos [1] from the demoscene are pretty demanding and freely available
stresstests, especially for everything 3D-related. The size-optimized
productions (4KB, 64KB) might also exploit some lesser known side effects
of bringing up a program. A review of running the most popular demos with
wine
I am thinking of going barbaric and doing WINEDEBUG=+relay,+snoop,+trace to see
how mt.exe get the wrong image size in
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22812
and just grep for the wrong/right sizes (0x 2b000, 176128, 0x 2b200,
176640 ) to see where mt gets it from but none turn up.
29 matches
Mail list logo
