Austin English wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:30 PM, James McKenzie
jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net wrote:
Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:08:30 +0200
Gert van den Berg wine-de...@mohag.net wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 16:23, James Mckenzie
jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net wrote:
Hi!
I would want to implement a change in where the wine prefix is assumed by
default.
The current behavior of only considering WINEPREFIX is cumbersome and risky.
Slip a finger, forget a letter and you end running a potential disastrous
command in the wrong prefix. I ruined my main prefix by
Hello Paul,
Paul Chitescu wrote:
I would want to implement a change in where the wine prefix is assumed by
default.
The current behavior of only considering WINEPREFIX is cumbersome and risky.
Slip a finger, forget a letter and you end running a potential disastrous
command in the wrong
On 15 July 2010 17:45, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
I'm listening. Can you give some examples of problems I've caused?
Candidates include
- the FIXME_ONCE guy; I think you and I are giving him the same advice;
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2010-July/085069.html
so that seems
On 07/16/2010 02:32 AM, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
Hello Paul,
Paul Chitescu wrote:
I would want to implement a change in where the wine prefix is assumed by
default.
The current behavior of only considering WINEPREFIX is cumbersome and risky.
Slip a finger, forget a letter and you end
- Misha; I told him tests were ok to submit during a code freeze; this is
true,
given that Alexandre accepted tests as last as last Friday. I should
have
told him that tests which add stubs probably aren't ok, but he learned
that as soon as he submitted.
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3340
Your paranoid
On 7/16/10 1:16 PM, Wilbert Ho wrote:
cmd mishandles quote-enclosed command strings because the leading
quote is included in the string when wine searches through the
built-in commands (dir is a builtin, but dir is not).
$ ./wine cmd.exe /c dir README
wine: cannot find
Ideally, tests should be independent on each other. That's not the case right
now. A clear example is msi:package, which often fails (on XP) with 1574
errors, see http://test.winehq.org/data/tests/msi:package.html. For all the
cases I've checked, when these 1574 errors occur the preceding
On 16 July 2010 12:26, Luke Benstead kaz...@gmail.com wrote:
Probably not my place to wade in here, but that's not true, he didn't
mention the commit log:
Be sure to mention in the post that it fixes
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21233;
I'm pretty sure he meant in the email when
On Friday 16 July 2010 12:32:33 pm Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
Hello Paul,
Paul Chitescu wrote:
I would want to implement a change in where the wine prefix is assumed by
default.
The current behavior of only considering WINEPREFIX is cumbersome and
risky.
Slip a finger, forget a
For reference, there are two basic reasons for not referring to
bugzilla when sending patches, in the commit log or otherwise. The
first one is that patches should stand on their own. If the bug
contains important information that's relevant to the patch, that
should be included directly in
Paul Chitescu wrote:
On Friday 16 July 2010 12:32:33 pm Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
Hello Paul,
Paul Chitescu wrote:
I would want to implement a change in where the wine prefix is assumed by
default.
The current behavior of only considering WINEPREFIX is cumbersome and
risky.
Slip a
Paul Vriens wrote:
On 07/14/2010 09:40 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Changelog:
* wineboot: fix Serbian Latin translation
Damjan Jovanovic
Hi Damjan,
Thanks for looking into this. I guess we need the pragma statement now
as you are introducing UTF-8, not?
I did talk to Nenad about
On 16 July 2010 14:10, Wolfram Sang wolf...@the-dreams.de wrote:
I am confused. Following this list only, I so far did not notice someone
saying don't tell the bug number (ok, might be my fault), but a few
times asking the question does this patch fix an actual bug. Also,
SubmittingPatches
On 07/16/2010 02:31 PM, Marko Nikolic wrote:
Paul Vriens wrote:
On 07/14/2010 09:40 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Changelog:
* wineboot: fix Serbian Latin translation
Damjan Jovanovic
Hi Damjan,
Thanks for looking into this. I guess we need the pragma statement now
as you are introducing
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 04:36 -0700, Greg Geldorp wrote:
For all the cases I've checked, when these 1574 errors occur the preceding
msi:install test timed out (the reverse is not true, I see msi:install
timeouts followed by a successful msi:package).
Do you have any clue why the test times
On 07/16/2010 03:05 PM, Hans Leidekker wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 04:36 -0700, Greg Geldorp wrote:
For all the cases I've checked, when these 1574 errors occur the preceding
msi:install test timed out (the reverse is not true, I see msi:install
timeouts followed by a successful
On 07/16/2010 03:05 PM, Sven Baars wrote:
MessageId=1207
SymbolicName=ERROR_NOT_CONTAINER
Language=NLD
-Not a container
+Geen
.
You are missing something here I guess.
--
Cheers,
Paul.
Paul Vriens wrote:
On 07/16/2010 03:05 PM, Sven Baars wrote:
MessageId=1207
SymbolicName=ERROR_NOT_CONTAINER
Language=NLD
-Not a container
+Geen
.
You are missing something here I guess.
I guess so too. New patch sent
Sven
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 15:12 +0200, Paul Vriens wrote:
In the past we have seen that on slower machines the number of tests
just exceeded the timeout. That has been 'corrected' back than by making
some tests interactive. I guess because of the multitude of new tests we
have ended up in the
Hans Leidekker h...@meelstraat.net writes:
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 04:36 -0700, Greg Geldorp wrote:
For all the cases I've checked, when these 1574 errors occur the preceding
msi:install test timed out (the reverse is not true, I see msi:install
timeouts followed by a successful
So it boils down to disagreements about two things:
- mentioning a bug number when posting a patch
- turning spammy FIXMEs into oneshots
These both seem like things reasonable developers could disagree about.
(Indeed, Roderick recently posted a patch with a bug number in the subject line,
From: Hans Leidekker [mailto:h...@meelstraat.net]
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 15:12 +0200, Paul Vriens wrote:
In the past we have seen that on slower machines the number of tests
just exceeded the timeout. That has been 'corrected' back than by making
some tests interactive. I guess because of
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Hans Leidekker h...@meelstraat.net wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 15:12 +0200, Paul Vriens wrote:
In the past we have seen that on slower machines the number of tests
just exceeded the timeout. That has been 'corrected' back than by making
some tests
On 16 July 2010 15:50, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
So it boils down to disagreements about two things:
- mentioning a bug number when posting a patch
- turning spammy FIXMEs into oneshots
No, you're mistaking specific instances for the larger issue there.
What it boils down to is giving
How do frequent wine committers, and especially Alexandre, feel about
these two issues?
I'd say Alexandre's opinion is pretty clear, as always:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2010-February/081744.html.
That's doesn't settle this at all, Alexandre is almost certainly referring
to
Luke Benstead kaz...@gmail.com wrote:
Sent: Jul 16, 2010 7:18 AM
To: Henri Verbeet hverb...@gmail.com
Cc: wine-devel@winehq.org, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com
Subject: Re: Please remove / block user from bugzilla
How do frequent wine committers, and especially Alexandre, feel about
these two
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 7:08 AM, Henri Verbeet hverb...@gmail.com wrote:
No, you're mistaking specific instances for the larger issue there.
What it boils down to is giving bad advice from a perceived position
of authority. Please don't make me search through the archives to find
every single
On 16 July 2010 16:31, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
Without actual examples, I can't see what you're objecting to.
There are three specific examples in this thread, two of those were
provided by yourself, one was by me. If you read carefully you can
probably find them. I also explicitly
On 07/16/2010 03:50 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
So it boils down to disagreements about two things:
- mentioning a bug number when posting a patch
I think this is a misunderstanding. There are different ways of adding
the bug number when posting a patch:
Very BAD:
-
Changelog: This fixes
Am 16.07.2010 11:32, schrieb Michael Stefaniuc:
Hello Paul,
Paul Chitescu wrote:
I would want to implement a change in where the wine prefix is assumed by
default.
The current behavior of only considering WINEPREFIX is cumbersome and risky.
Slip a finger, forget a letter and you end
On 07/16/2010 04:58 PM, André Hentschel wrote:
Am 16.07.2010 11:32, schrieb Michael Stefaniuc:
Hello Paul,
Paul Chitescu wrote:
I would want to implement a change in where the wine prefix is assumed by
default.
The current behavior of only considering WINEPREFIX is cumbersome and risky.
Slip
Very BAD:
-
Changelog: This fixes bug #4711
BAD:
Changelog: Change the handling of flags X Y Z because this fixes bug #4711
OK:
---
Changelog: Change a corner case in the handling of flags X Y Z (with tests).
This resolve the issue from bug #4711.
The
Hi wine-devel
I have problems with tests I written last time.
The problem is connected with privileges levels under Windows.
The method I'm testing is IGameExplorer::AddGame,
which registers given game in Windows Game Explorer.
One of it's parameters (installScope) defines if game should
be
2010/7/16 Mariusz Pluciński vsha...@gmail.com:
Hi wine-devel
I have problems with tests I written last time.
The problem is connected with privileges levels under Windows.
The method I'm testing is IGameExplorer::AddGame,
which registers given game in Windows Game Explorer.
One of it's
Folks,
First I want to thank everybody for your great work of the past two
years. I'm very happy with what we have achieved with 1.2 (even if we
didn't manage to get the regression numbers down ;-) You should all go
out and have a drink to celebrate.
Code freeze is of course lifted now, so once
On 07/16/2010 05:50 PM, André Hentschel wrote:
+ppDer Quellcode ist jetzta
href=http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/wine/wine-1.2-rc7.tar.bz2;verfuuml;gbar/a.
Hi André,
You've listed the wrong download.
--
Cheers,
Paul.
W dniu 16.07.2010 19:59, Reece Dunn pisze:
Use broken() to denote the administrator case --
ok(hr == S_OK || broken(hr == E_ACCESSDENIED) /* non-Admin user
*/, IGameExplorer_AddGame(...));
This means that E_ACCESSDENIED is a valid case on Windows, but not on Wine.
- Reece
Yes, I
* On Thu, 15 Jul 2010, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
TRACE_ONCE probably could help in some cases too. There I see another
I fail to see how TRACE_ONCE could make any sense.
TRACE is used to trace the important parts of the code flow. Just
printing a TRACE once is
Dear All:
Congrats on 1.2!
I have begun sending my patches from my repository:
http://github.com/misha680/wine/commits/master
Specifically, I have sent the first 10 patches (of approx 70 currently).
I look forward to your comments/commits ;)
Also, if anyone knows how to make git format-patch
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Marvin test...@testbot.winehq.org wrote:
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3360
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3361
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3357
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3363
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3366
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3364
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3359
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3362
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3365
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3367
Your paranoid
Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
Austin English wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:30 PM, James McKenzie
jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net wrote:
Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:08:30 +0200
Gert van den Berg wine-de...@mohag.net wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 16:23,
On 07/16/2010 04:22 PM, Misha Koshelev wrote:
Also, if anyone knows how to make git format-patch only output the 10
_bottom-most_ patches
If you have 70 patches in your tree then:
git format-patch HEAD~70..HEAD~60
Vitaliy.
Misha Koshelev wrote:
Dear All:
Congrats on 1.2!
I have begun sending my patches from my repository:
http://github.com/misha680/wine/commits/master
Misha:
Might I make a tiny suggestion: Send in one set of patches and wait for
AJ's and others feedback. Make appropriate corrections and
On 17/07/10 10:22, Misha Koshelev wrote:
Also, if anyone knows how to make git format-patch only output the 10
_bottom-most_ patches, please let me know.
Partial solution:
use git format-patch without the --stdout, to generate all the patches
as files, then git send-email or imap-send some
Misha Koshelev wrote:
Dear All:
Congrats on 1.2!
I have begun sending my patches from my repository:
http://github.com/misha680/wine/commits/master
Specifically, I have sent the first 10 patches (of approx 70 currently).
I look forward to your comments/commits ;)
Also, if anyone knows how
57 matches
Mail list logo
