Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6210
Your paranoid
On 10/15/10 8:44 PM, Yaron Shahrabani wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Yaron Shahrabani sh.ya...@gmail.com
mailto:sh.ya...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 4:39 PM, James McKenzie
jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net mailto:jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net
wrote:
On
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6213
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6212
Your paranoid
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6211
Your paranoid
On 10/15/2010 18:25, Adam Martinson wrote:
Needed to associate an internal ref count, etc with a xmlDoc
outside of domdoc.c, without creating the whole domdoc struct.
---
dlls/msxml3/domdoc.c|6 ++
dlls/msxml3/msxml_private.h |1 +
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0
On 10/15/2010 18:25, Adam Martinson wrote:
Implemented on top of libxml's hash table.
---
dlls/msxml3/schema.c | 376
+++---
1 files changed, 326 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
+static LONG cache_entry_release(cache_entry* entry)
{
-
You will need this patch to compile Wine at Ubuntu 10.10,
because of the new Xorg Server 1.9.
If you still get a compilation error in dlls/winex11.drv you
will need to add the flag -lXxf86vm.
With kind regards,
Gerold Jens Wucherpfennnig
--- dlls/winex11.drv/xvidmode.c_org 2010-10-15
Gerold Jens Wucherpfennig gjwucherpfen...@gmx.net writes:
You will need this patch to compile Wine at Ubuntu 10.10,
because of the new Xorg Server 1.9.
If you still get a compilation error in dlls/winex11.drv you
will need to add the flag -lXxf86vm.
We can't do that. What did they change
Hi and welcome to wine development,
your patch is wrapped. see the gdi part of it at
http://source.winehq.org/patches/.
so you should check your mailclient.
Further you might want to split it per module (gdi and mscms, one patch each)
--
Best Regards, André Hentschel
Hi Tomasz,
This patch is wrapped, unlike your first attempt were you attached the
patch.
dlls/gdi32/icm.c |8 ++--
dlls/mscms/transform.c |2 ++
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/gdi32/icm.c b/dlls/gdi32/icm.c
index 0e346ee..d75c528
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 9:22 AM, James McKenzie
jjmckenzi...@earthlink.netwrote:
On 10/15/10 8:44 PM, Yaron Shahrabani wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Yaron Shahrabani sh.ya...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 4:39 PM, James McKenzie
jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net wrote:
On 10/16/10 5:38 AM, André Hentschel wrote:
Hi and welcome to wine development,
your patch is wrapped. see the gdi part of it at
http://source.winehq.org/patches/.
so you should check your mailclient.
Further you might want to split it per module (gdi and mscms, one patch each)
Andre:
The
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org wrote:
Gerold Jens Wucherpfennig gjwucherpfen...@gmx.net writes:
You will need this patch to compile Wine at Ubuntu 10.10,
because of the new Xorg Server 1.9.
If you still get a compilation error in dlls/winex11.drv you
On Sa, 2010-10-16 at 13:29 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Gerold Jens Wucherpfennig gjwucherpfen...@gmx.net writes:
You will need this patch to compile Wine at Ubuntu 10.10,
because of the new Xorg Server 1.9.
If you still get a compilation error in dlls/winex11.drv you
will need to
On Sa, 2010-10-16 at 10:02 +0200, Gerold Jens Wucherpfennig wrote:
You will need this patch to compile Wine at Ubuntu 10.10,
because of the new Xorg Server 1.9.
You can't do that.
Your patch will break the build on many systems.
Are you missing libxxf86vm1 or libxxf86vm-dev?
If you still get
Hi Tomasz.
Welcome to Wine.
You already fixed your missing real name in your first patch.
That is good, but there are more suggestions.
For applications which uses EnumICMProfiles to detect monitor icc profile,
there should be a copy of monitor profile in
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Erich Hoover ehoo...@mines.edu wrote:
If you guys would mind looking over this revised patchset I would
greatly appreciate it, I believe I've appropriately included your
corrections. Please note that mswsock.h and ws2ipdef.h will be
submitted as separate
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6225
Your paranoid
Hi Wine packing Team.
Cups has a compatibility package for the BSD style printing system
(lpr, lpq, lprm, lpc and related files).
The package is named cups-bsd on ubuntu and cupsys-bsd on debian.
This compatibility package is no longer needed since Wine-1.3.5,
when cups is installed:
+1
+if (!prc)
+{
+UINT width, height;
+hr = IWICBitmapSource_GetSize(This-source, width, height);
+if (FAILED(hr)) return hr;
+rc.X = 0;
+rc.Y = 0;
+rc.Width = width;
+rc.Height = height;
+
On 10/16/10 3:30 PM, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
Hi Wine packing Team.
Cups has a compatibility package for the BSD style printing system
(lpr, lpq, lprm, lpc and related files).
The package is named cups-bsd on ubuntu and cupsys-bsd on debian.
This compatibility package is no longer needed
22 matches
Mail list logo
