Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12111
Your paranoid
2011/6/30 Charles Welton charles...@gmail.com:
---
+memcpy(buffer_mem, vertices, size);
There is no need to allocate and write into your own buffer then copy
the content, you can directly write into the vertex buffer.
A more important issue: MSDN says The ID3DXLine interface
I've implemented ConvertPointRepsToAdjacency, but would like some help
to make it's worst case performance bearable.
In init_edge_face_map I initialize an array of edge_face structs, and
in find_adjacent_face I do a linear search through that array. I would
like to replace the array with a hash
On 30 June 2011 14:49, Michael Mc Donnell mich...@mcdonnell.dk wrote:
In init_edge_face_map I initialize an array of edge_face structs, and
in find_adjacent_face I do a linear search through that array. I would
like to replace the array with a hash table, so that the search time
becomes
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 02:56:08AM -0300, Lucas Zawacki wrote:
Hey guys, how are you doing? I've got some patches for you.
The first is a refactoring of the BuildActionMap implementations for
keyboard and mouse. I think with 'semantic_to_obj_id' the mapping is
pretty much correct for
Ok, try with a modified header:
OK no problem, i will try later today. But i don't think it's a bug
in applicability of those patches. I began with wine testing 2 years
ago and did many regression tests, reverse reg.testing, found faulty
commit even though it was covered by several other
On 06/30/2011 05:31 PM, wy...@volny.cz wrote:
Ok, try with a modified header:
OK no problem, i will try later today. But i don't think it's a bug
in applicability of those patches. I began with wine testing 2 years
ago and did many regression tests, reverse reg.testing, found faulty
commit
2011/6/30 wy...@volny.cz:
Ok, try with a modified header:
OK no problem, i will try later today. But i don't think it's a bug
in applicability of those patches. I began with wine testing 2 years
ago and did many regression tests, reverse reg.testing, found faulty
commit even though it was
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/6/30 wy...@volny.cz:
Ok, try with a modified header:
OK no problem, i will try later today. But i don't think it's a bug
in applicability of those patches. I began with wine testing 2 years
ago and did many
On 06/30/2011 05:57 PM, wy...@volny.cz wrote:
$ cd wine-git
$ wget http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6901628/raw.patch
$ patch -p1 raw.patch
$ ./tools/make_requests
$ ./configure
$ make
works here:
Thanks Austin for testing, but this raw.patch is already modified
and works for me too. I would
On 06/30/2011 06:07 PM, Vincas Miliūnas wrote:
On 06/30/2011 05:57 PM, wy...@volny.cz wrote:
$ cd wine-git
$ wget http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6901628/raw.patch
$ patch -p1 raw.patch
$ ./tools/make_requests
$ ./configure
$ make
works here:
Thanks Austin for testing, but this raw.patch is
On 30 June 2011 17:34, Jacek Caban ja...@codeweavers.com wrote:
+cpp_quote(#define DXGI_MWA_NO_WINDOW_CHANGES 0x1)
+cpp_quote(#define DXGI_MWA_NO_ALT_ENTER 0x2)
+cpp_quote(#define DXGI_MWA_NO_PRINT_SCREEN0x4)
+cpp_quote(#define DXGI_MWA_VALID 0x7)
Aren't those usually
Ouch, that is a leftover from an older try at this code. So much for
double checking the patches...
2011/6/30 Marcus Meissner meiss...@suse.de:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 02:56:08AM -0300, Lucas Zawacki wrote:
Hey guys, how are you doing? I've got some patches for you.
The first is a refactoring
On 06/30/11 17:44, Henri Verbeet wrote:
On 30 June 2011 17:34, Jacek Caban ja...@codeweavers.com wrote:
+cpp_quote(#define DXGI_MWA_NO_WINDOW_CHANGES 0x1)
+cpp_quote(#define DXGI_MWA_NO_ALT_ENTER 0x2)
+cpp_quote(#define DXGI_MWA_NO_PRINT_SCREEN0x4)
+cpp_quote(#define DXGI_MWA_VALID
Hi Jay,
+HRESULT TRASH_RestoreItem(LPCITEMIDLIST pidl){
Nit: the brace should be on its own line.
+HRESULT TRASH_RestoreItem(LPCITEMIDLIST pidl) DECLSPEC_HIDDEN;
+HRESULT TRASH_EraseItem(LPCITEMIDLIST pidl) DECLSPEC_HIDDEN;
These two functions are never called in this patch, so you're
David is right, the address is not stored as a pointer but as a DWORD in
place of the chars. Like this:
gethostbyname(winehq.org):
wrong: (DWORD) host-h_addr_list[i] = 0x00cbd1c8 = 200.209.203.0
right: *(DWORD*) host-h_addr_list[i] = 0x86192ed1 = 209.46.25.134
Patch welcome ;)
--Juan
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Henri Verbeet hverb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 June 2011 14:49, Michael Mc Donnell mich...@mcdonnell.dk wrote:
In init_edge_face_map I initialize an array of edge_face structs, and
in find_adjacent_face I do a linear search through that array. I would
like to
On Mo, 2011-06-27 at 11:59 +0200, Jacek Caban wrote:
How can we force tests to use VT_UI4?
It's not JScript builtin type, you need to extend tests host object for
that.
Sorry, no clue.
Which host object?
+/* 0x7fff is 2147483647 is INT_MAX */
+tmp = 2147483647*-1;
0x... is
On 06/28/11 15:47, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
On Mo, 2011-06-27 at 11:59 +0200, Jacek Caban wrote:
How can we force tests to use VT_UI4?
It's not JScript builtin type, you need to extend tests host object for
that.
Sorry, no clue.
Which host object
Global host object for tests. See how
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 07:57, wy...@volny.cz wrote:
$ cd wine-git
$ wget http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6901628/raw.patch
$ patch -p1 raw.patch
$ ./tools/make_requests
$ ./configure
$ make
works here:
Thanks Austin for testing, but this raw.patch is already modified
and works for me too.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Michael Mc Donnell
mich...@mcdonnell.dk wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Henri Verbeet hverb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 June 2011 14:49, Michael Mc Donnell mich...@mcdonnell.dk wrote:
In init_edge_face_map I initialize an array of edge_face structs, and
Otherwise WINE compilation with 32bit gcc gets broken (not yet
100%
confirmed, see the discussion with Wylda on wine-devel mailing
list).
Small patch to test for the issue -
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6901628/bug_test.patch
Now i can confirm for sure, that simple testcase bug_test.patch
On Thursday 30 June 2011 21:50:45 Michael Mc Donnell wrote:
I have another question about my test. I've basically copied all the
test data from my ConvertAdjacencyToPointReps test, and then just
inverted the conditions. Should I merge the two tests, put the test
data in a separate function, or
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Michael Mc Donnell
mich...@mcdonnell.dk wrote:
I've implemented the look-up scheme that you described.
+if (!point_reps) /* Indentity point reps */
+{
+memset(adjacency, -1, 3 * num_faces * sizeof(*adjacency));
+return D3D_OK;
+}
24 matches
Mail list logo
