I have two suggestions -
- git clone has a --depth option which does a shallow clone (i.e. with some
history removed).
- you can use git-archive to export arbitrary commits out as a tar ball
dynamically; there is no need to have store a tar ball permanently.
That said, I am doubtful about
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15023
Your paranoid
Francois Gouget fgou...@free.fr writes:
@@ -72,10 +72,12 @@ static int ATTRIB_wprintf(const WCHAR *format, ...) {
}
va_start(parms, format);
-len = vsnprintfW(output_bufW, MAX_WRITECONSOLE_SIZE/sizeof(WCHAR),
format, parms);
+SetLastError(NO_ERROR);
+len =
On 10/19/2011 08:03 PM, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
The new question is:
What operating system does Wine run applications from?
Should be obvious for a human.
I will take suggestions on other questions that regular users can answer
easily, but would stump (for a bit anyway) a bot, or bot author.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:48, Jeremy Newman jnew...@codeweavers.com wrote:
I will take suggestions on other questions that regular users can answer
easily, but would stump (for a bit anyway) a bot, or bot author.
Why not the good and old random math questions inside an image? For
example 2 + 4
Hi Vitaliy,
could you check on win64? I had a test failure there with your patch.
- Dan
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:49 AM, build...@kegel.com wrote:
This is an experimental automated build and test service.
Please feel free to ignore this email while we work the kinks out.
For more info about
On 20/10/11 4:13 PM, Bruno Jesus wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:48, Jeremy Newmanjnew...@codeweavers.com wrote:
I will take suggestions on other questions that regular users can answer
easily, but would stump (for a bit anyway) a bot, or bot author.
Why not the good and old random math
Unless you want to implement a captcha system, any system is going to
annoy the users. Bots can be programmed to answer those fields pretty
easily; if a spammer wants to get around it, they will :)
JL
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Ken Sharp kennyb...@o2.co.uk wrote:
On 20/10/11 4:13 PM,
Isn't the system for creating new accounts only? If it's just to post
messages then anything will be annoying.
On 20/10/11 7:48 PM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
Unless you want to implement a captcha system, any system is going to
annoy the users. Bots can be programmed to answer those fields
I don't subscribe to websites that have annoying captchas either way;
and many people are like that. Bot authors have proved they can beat
any system; and captchas (recaptcha especially) has proved itself as
one of the most effective and unintrusive free captcha systems.
JL
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011
On Oct 20, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
I don't subscribe to websites that have annoying captchas either way;
and many people are like that. Bot authors have proved they can beat
any system; and captchas (recaptcha especially) has proved itself as
one of the most effective and
I think that's a great system, but you'll need volunteers :) I can
volunteer for that matter, but I won't exactly spend a lot of time on
it.
JL
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Josh Juran j...@iswifter.net wrote:
On Oct 20, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
I don't subscribe to
Here here
On 20/10/11 8:17 PM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
I think that's a great system, but you'll need volunteers :) I can
volunteer for that matter, but I won't exactly spend a lot of time on
it.
JL
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Josh Juranj...@iswifter.net wrote:
On Oct 20, 2011, at
On 2011-10-20 (October, Thursday) 19:17:56 Jerome Leclanche wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Josh Juran j...@iswifter.net wrote:
Quarantine new users' posts until approved by a human moderator. After a
few intelligent posts, grant the user unmoderated posting privilege.
The Boost
Fails to build here?
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:51 PM, build...@kegel.com wrote:
This is an experimental automated build and test service.
Please feel free to ignore this email while we work the kinks out.
For more info about this message, see http://wiki.winehq.org/BuildBot
The Buildbot
Fails to build here?
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:52 PM, build...@kegel.com wrote:
This is an experimental automated build and test service.
Please feel free to ignore this email while we work the kinks out.
For more info about this message, see http://wiki.winehq.org/BuildBot
The Buildbot
Could be because of definition problems. Here's what I get compiling wine64:
../../../../wine.git/dlls/dinput/tests/device.c:117:5: warning: comparison
is always false due to limited range of data type
../../../../wine.git/dlls/dinput/tests/device.c:120:5: warning: comparison
is always false
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Vitaliy Margolen
wine-de...@kievinfo.com wrote:
device.c:117: Test failed: GetDeviceData() should have failed: 80040207
device.c:120: Test failed: GetDeviceData() should have failed: 80040207
make: *** [device.ok] Error 8
Could be because of definition
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 02:13, Marvin test...@testbot.winehq.org wrote:
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be
On 10/20/2011 06:18 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Vitaliy Margolen
wine-de...@kievinfo.com wrote:
device.c:117: Test failed: GetDeviceData() should have failed: 80040207
device.c:120: Test failed: GetDeviceData() should have failed: 80040207
make: *** [device.ok] Error
On 10/20/2011 06:26 PM, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
On 10/20/2011 06:18 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Vitaliy Margolen
wine-de...@kievinfo.com wrote:
device.c:117: Test failed: GetDeviceData() should have failed: 80040207
device.c:120: Test failed: GetDeviceData() should
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=15042
Your paranoid
22 matches
Mail list logo
