/index.php?title=VirusDB
*/
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
Fun times:
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34556
Fun times:
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34556
Damian wrote:
1) ATI or nVidia for new GPU? Does SLI/Crossfire work with wine?
Don't know. I just use nvidia cards I find in the trash :-) But then
I don't actually play games, so I don't care about 3d performance.
2) FX 8320 or intel same price class CPU? As the AMD has far inferior
single
I don't seem to have saved the (crappy) script.
There is something similar at
https://code.google.com/p/winezeug/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2Fappdb-mashup
and it wouldn't be too hard to whip something up again for somebody
who is motivated. Please do throttle the scraping script to avoid
Minor problem:
+static void test_strncpy(void)
+{
+size_t len = 10;
+char *ret;
+char dst[len + 1];
Hmm. That last line is a VLA, and might not compile in all C
compilers because it's not allowed in C89.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/448844/variable-sized-arrays-in-c
Wine seems
I need to port fairly large WinAPI-heavy application to Linux. After some
googling it becomes clear that there's nothing except for Wine/Winelib
which is *huge*. However for at least most basic WinAPI functions it looks
fairly easy to just re-implement it via Boost/STL/libc/Linux syscalls. Why
Or run
https://winezeug.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/install-addons.sh
Watch http://source.winehq.org/patches/
for your patch's status (see legend at bottom).
It might be rejected since it doesn't actually fix any behavioral
problem in Wine.
IIRC trivial cleanups in code are frowned upon, especially if
they cross many modules. Better to pick some small
real problem
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22280 just got another dup.
How awful would it be to make SetThreadPriorityBoost just
return success, as in the patch attached to
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22280#c1
Thanks. I saw the 'doesn't apply' status at
source.winehq.org/patches, so was going to take another look tonight.
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:40 PM, James Eder jimpor...@gmail.com wrote:
Dan, the patch doesn't build for 64-bit Wine. On the #else side you have
an unwanted semicolon.
--
Jim
Hi Gaurab!
Glad to hear you're interested in wine, and in cmd.
You might start by reading previous discussion on the topic, e.g. the
full thread following
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2009-December/080643.html
and
http://kegel.com/wine/sweng/2010/
Two tips that might help smooth
Hi Anulesh,
improving wine's support of cygwin is a toughie.
( I gave http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15679 the old college
try, but failed. )
You should probably be more specific about what you have in mind.
- Dan
I suspect this is a real fix, and there is no gcc bug.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Qian Hong fract...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dan,
Thanks for working on it! It is really an annoying bug, however, is
adding DECLSPEC_NOINLINE a workaround or a real fix? If it is only a
workaround, would that
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
Hooking is a fragile business. Somebody somewhere is probably
making assumptions about how hooking works (like, how many stack
frames are pushed), and inlining call_hook_proc probably violates one
of those assumptions
OK, thanks.
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:45 AM, André Hentschel n...@dawncrow.de wrote:
Hi Dan,
i just removed your gsoc idea and i want to let you know why. There was a
quite short discussion on IRC:
Andre_H_laptop: austin_laptop: Dan added a quite controversal gsoc idea...
afaik ken needed
I had a look at a couple warnings, e.g.
file:///home/dank/Downloads/scan-build-2012-12-18-1/report-z07lcL.html#EndPath
file:///home/dank/Downloads/scan-build-2012-12-18-1/report-9D2p5I.html#EndPath
They're hard to follow, but mostly look like garbage :-( Too bad
there's no web interface for
Henri wrote:
+/* Recent (304.64, possibly earlier) versions of the nvidia driver only
+ * report a DFP's native mode through RandR 1.2 / 1.3. Standard DMT modes
+ * are only listed through RandR 1.0 / 1.1. This is completely useless,
+ * but NVIDIA considers this a feature, so it's
$ git clone https://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git newwine-git
Cloning into 'newwine-git'...
error: server certificate verification failed. CAfile:
/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt CRLfile: none while accessing
https://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/info/refs
Maybe that's related to the big fat
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
$ git clone https://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git newwine-git
Cloning into 'newwine-git'...
error: server certificate verification failed. CAfile:
/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt CRLfile: none while accessing
https
After gstreamer, gcrypt is also dropping support for alternative
thread libraries.
Good thing secur32/schannel_gnutls.c doesn't use it. (Right?)
- Dan
-- Forwarded message --
From: Werner Koch w...@gnupg.org
Date: Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 1:31 AM
Subject: Re: Bug#566351: libgcrypt11:
Francois wrote:
(*) A particularly interesting one to me is testing untrusted code on
real hardware (with possible approaches being direct access to a
graphics card from within a VM
I had some fun googling your wishlist. Presumably you've seen some of
these links already:
Which game were you testing?
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 3:26 AM, joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com wrote:
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
+void WINAPIV _vcomp_fork(BOOL ifval, int nargs, void *wrapper, ...)
+__ms_va_list valist;
it's ugly to use varargs only as a hack to get a pointer to the first
argument.
Would taking the
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org wrote:
What I'm actually saying is that you should stop playing games with the
compiler and implement this in assembler...
Thanks for the cleartext.
Christian Costa wrote:
...
--- a/programs/services/rpc.c
+++ b/programs/services/rpc.c
...
@@ -952,7 +952,7 @@ BOOL service_send_command( struct service_entry
*service, HANDLE pipe,
}
r = GetOverlappedResult( pipe, overlapped, count, FALSE );
}
-if (!r || count != sizeof
Jason wrote:
It's clearly time to start splitting WCMD_for into several helper functions.
I completely agree, and it was definitely on my radar to do... its really
ugly code in there (I take responsibility for a lot of that!) as it has
been a slow incremental increase in what we actually
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Max TenEyck Woodbury
m...@mtew.isa-geek.net wrote:
... There are criteria beyond the two you mentioned,
but it is rare to see them come into play. Few people know enough to
even recognize such problems. While far from an expert on such matters,
I have enough
In general, patches to wine should have some
demonstrated benefit, either by increasing the
number of passing conformance tests, or by
making some app work better, or both.
Your current patch doesn't seem to do either of these things.
Getting into a pissing match with AJ about patent
and
New draft at
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=22035
(the testbot seems stuck... Maarten, does it need a kick?)
Thanks to Maarten for getting me to try C varargs again;
the first assembly function is now gone.
I've also added comments that explain the vcomp execution
model, I hope
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 7:27 AM, joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com wrote:
I found your message very unclear.
The patch adds support for OpenMP programs like this:
And then you start talking about vcomp_fork without telling us where
it comes from and what it should do.
Good point - it's unfair
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Kyle Auble randomidma...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'm just wondering is assembly definitely needed?
This is just based on some googling and skimming
through StackOverflow, but it sounds like you can
still use va_list on amd64. It just takes some
tweaking:
As you might know from watching too many of my patches
scroll by, I've been working on adding support
for OpenMP to wine. (A handful of games, and a lot
of serious apps, seem to use that api.) After getting
it nicely organized and cleaned up to the point where it
passed all the tests I could
Chris wrote:
1. I discovered later that I don't think this is the root of my
original bug - and in fact doesn't seem to affect behavior of my
program. Is it still worth submitting?
Generally, fixes are more likely to get committed when they
don't break anything (did you run all the
As I mentioned earlier, the testbot can't handle vcomp.dll tests
until a fix for http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31609
is deployed.
It can handle vcomp100.dll tests, though (no manifest). I guess I can submit
the series again with the vcomp100 forwarding and tests
in a sixth patch, that
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
As I mentioned earlier, the testbot can't handle vcomp.dll tests
until a fix for http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31609
is deployed.
It can handle vcomp100.dll tests, though (no manifest). I guess I can submit
the series
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Francois Gouget fgou...@codeweavers.com wrote:
(But as it turns out, the code I needed to fix was in buildbot,
not winetest.)
Maybe the WineTestBot code needs a similar fix?
In testbot/src/TestLauncher/TestLauncher.c?
Yeah, um, ^buildbot^testbot
I have a patch
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
Testing vcomp100 does work, but I shouldn't need to
do that until there's some vcomp100-specific code.
msvcr90/tests just adds a manifest, and that works.
Heh
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Vincent Povirk madewokh...@gmail.com wrote:
As I understand it, you need to set up a mingw build as in
http://wiki.winehq.org/CompilingDLLsUsingMingw
Sort of. You don't need a
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
Testing vcomp100 does work, but I shouldn't need to
do that until there's some vcomp100-specific code.
msvcr90/tests just adds a manifest, and that works.
Heh. It does add a manifest, but I don't think it works.
See http
Hi folks,
how does one build the native version of winetest.exe?
I looked around a bit, and didn't see any obvious instructions.
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2011-July/091144.html
touches on it, but doesn't say much.
I ask because I'm interested in tracking down why testbot
doesn't
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Explicit ok() calls are better than hiding them inside a macro.
Uh-oh. Want me to get rid of this macro
+#define CHECK_RET_ERRNO(ret, ex) \
+do { \
+ok(ret == ex, ret is %d, expected %d\n, ret, ex); \
+ok(errno == ex, errno is %d, expected %d\n,
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org wrote:
But msvcr100's wmemmove_s/wmemcpy_s are different; they
do not change errno. Tests in my patch confirm this.
They do set errno, the tests are broken.
Aw, foo. Thanks, resent with fixes.
I asked Alexandre what
http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/88732
needed before it could be reviewed. He said it needed to adapt
to the recent parameter checking changes. I see that
when he took my patch
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/attachments/20120728/bea2581d/attachment.obj
Using varargs like Andre tried doesn't work because pushing a va_list
isn't the same as pushing a list of arguments.
So I think we need assembly. The assembly I gave earlier is wrong
because it cleans up the stack, which it's not allowed to do.
I've attached an updated patch to
Yeah, it might be as simple as
_vcomp_vfork proc
add sp,4 ; skip parallel flag and arg count
ret ; jump to helper function, leaving its args on stack
or something like that.
Yes indeed, this works:
extern void WINAPIV VCOMP__vcomp_fork(DWORD parallel, int ncount, void
(__cdecl *helper)(__ms_va_list), ...);
__ASM_GLOBAL_FUNC( VCOMP__vcomp_fork,
pop %eax\n\t /* save return address */
add $8,%esp\n\t/* skip
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
Yes indeed, this works:
extern void WINAPIV VCOMP__vcomp_fork(DWORD parallel, int ncount, void
(__cdecl *helper)(__ms_va_list), ...);
__ASM_GLOBAL_FUNC( VCOMP__vcomp_fork,
pop %eax\n\t /* save
Testing vcomp100 does work, but I shouldn't need to
do that until there's some vcomp100-specific code.
msvcr90/tests just adds a manifest, and that works.
Andre wrote:
i'd something like in my attachment
Sorry, I should have linked to
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=20684
where I verified that testing vcomp100 did indeed work around the problem.
I guess that's where I'll put the tests until somebody hits me with a cluestick.
Having fun trying to figure out what's in the black box of _vcomp_fork(),
the helper function that spawns threads in Visual C's OpenMP
support library.
The C source code
#include stdio.h
#include omp.h
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
double d;
double e;
int i;
printf(d is %p, e
I'm trying to test a better set of stubs for vcomp.dll and its ilk,
but those dlls don't seem to be installed on testbot.
Is vcomp{,90,100}.dll not installed by default on Windows?
If not, should we install it on a few of the VMs?
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
Is vcomp{,90,100}.dll not installed by default on Windows?
If not, should we install it on a few of the VMs?
Nevermind for the moment, I probably have a manifest problem.
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
Is vcomp{,90,100}.dll not installed by default on Windows?
If not, should we install it on a few of the VMs?
Nevermind for the moment, I probably have a manifest
I just ran into a CAD app whose 64 bit version runs better than its 32
bit version on Wine
(the 32 bit version hangs with http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31358
but the 64 bit version gets past that and seems to actually do something).
Not very important, but kind of cool.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Pau Garcia i Quiles
pgqui...@elpauer.org wrote:
In that regard, let me say: this year I am coorganizing the
CrossDesktop DevRoom at FOSDEM and I am truly disappointed we have not
received a single talk proposal about Wine, even though I sent the
call for talks
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Pau Garcia i Quiles
pgqui...@elpauer.org wrote:
D'oh! Looks like I was fooled by a long-delayed message delivery. The
message I replied to is from *six months* ago. I've gotten several
of those
I'm running into a similar problem,
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23058
If you're using a different activex control,
please file a new bug, with a way
for others to reproduce the problem.
Any chance you could add an HTML5 mode?
http://praegnanz.de/html5video/
shows a bunch of HTML5 video
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Piotr Caban piotr.ca...@gmail.com wrote:
The calling convention is correct. The class name is _Container_base0 (not
_Container_base).
I can't say anything about the implementation. I don't know what this class
is supposed to do.
Can you have a look at
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org wrote:
You shouldn't need to put that in msvcrt.
OK, I'll put it in msvcr90.
Also please check the parameters correctly like every other _s function does.
The wmemmove_s/wmemcpy_s I posted are exact copies of the existing
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org wrote:
You shouldn't need to put that in msvcrt.
OK, I'll put it in msvcr90.
It's not supposed to be there either.
Maybe I was grepping without the w prefix by accident, sorry.
I see now it's only in msvcr100.
- Dan
Groveling around, I found a few possibilities:
backtraces broken on gcc 4.7
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26791
ICE when compiling:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641056
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640864
Initial checkin of afxapi, a class library aiming to provide
source-level compatibility with MFC.
http://www.openwatcom.org:4000/@md=dcd=//depot/openwatcom/bld/afxapi/include/cdf=//depot/openwatcom/bld/afxapi/include/afxcmn4.mnlra=src=sc=3Z1@/36051?ac=10
Wonder how that's going.
Piotr, can you review this, please? I've only tested this with two
apps on 32 bits,
I have not tested at all on 64 bits, and am only guessing on the
calling convention stuff.
Seems to fix http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27698 for
Harvest and one other app (I can't reproduce the problem
Daniel Lehman wrote:
@@ -1949,7 +1949,7 @@ basic_string_char* __thiscall
basic_string_char_replace_cstr_len(basic_string_ch
-if(off+len this-size)
+if(off+len off || off+len this-size)
len = this-size-off;
Wouldn't this be more elegant:
if(num this-size-pos)
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 2:03 AM, GOUJON Alexandre ale.gou...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone know how to keep the Save File dialog box from
listing My Computer in the LookIn pulldown?
Have you read
Is it worth for working on patches for these issues, or is this
completely impossible with the current architecture?
Do you know yet why no symlink is made
in dosdevices for /media/-?
I haven't heard any rumblings about the current architecture
being hopelessly broken.
I'm creating a page of tips at
http://wiki.winehq.org/DisplayingUnixFilenames
for vendors shipping Windows apps on Linux with Wine
who want their apps to use Windows paths throughout
internally, but display Linux paths in the GUI
This is something I've been meaning to do ever since I helped port
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Hans Leidekker h...@codeweavers.com wrote:
That file does seem to be on disc, but somewhere else:
c:/windows/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v4.0.30319/System.EnterpriseServices.Wrapper.dll
Not sure how serious it is that that's misplaced. Have other folks seen
No objection here. Seems like an obvious thing to do. I'll do it
later today if nobody objects.
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Andrea Canciani ranm...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you think you could write a test that (semi-)reliably
causes the deadlock you're fixing?
Yes, I guess it should be possible.
Could you point me to a test which triggers a deadlock (in particular,
how should the
With current git, when I try
rm -rf .wine
sh winetricks -q dotnet40
sh winetricks -q dotnet_verifier
wine netfx_setupverifier.exe
the verifier reports failure:
...
[07/04/12,21:45:13] ERROR File
.
On an administrivial note, you should send one patch per
email to wine-patches.
Do you think you could write a test that (semi-)reliably
causes the deadlock you're fixing?
The patches have been tested by Dan Kegel (in CC) and are currently
being used by many MacOSX and Linux users to run LoL.
Our
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 2:51 AM, Piotr Caban piotr.ca...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch looks correct. It's also good to fix other functions with similar
bug.
Great, I'll have a bigger patchset for review in a few days.
Thanks,
Dan
Hi Piotr,
could you review the patch in http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31085 ?
If you like it, I'll submit it to wine-patches. It passes winetestbot and
gets pulsen and stepmania past the splash screen abort.
Why are there no tests for msvcp60?
If you think it's appropriate, I can add
Henri wrote:
-hr = wined3d_device_get_display_mode(ddraw-wined3d_device, 0, mode);
-if (FAILED(hr))
+if (FAILED(hr = wined3d_get_adapter_display_mode(ddraw-wined3d,
WINED3DADAPTER_DEFAULT, mode)))
Seems like a step back in readability to combine setting and testing hr.
- Dan
AJ sometimes kindly fixes problems in patches
while committing them (I guess it's easier than
rejecting the patch for small issues).
I wonder if these silent improvements would
be worth collecting as a sort of style-guide-by-example.
Anyone remember any good examples?
I've started a list at
Nozomi wrote:
+for (i = 0; i order * order; i++)
I might have written
int n = order * order;
for (i=0; i n; i++)
to avoid repeating the multiplication every time around the loop,
even though multiplication is cheap nowadays, and -O1 will optimize
it out anyway. Staying in the
In at least one app, the hotkey control doesn't draw itself.
Invalidating its own window during HOTKEY_Paint gets the
control to draw properly, and makes the app happy.
Fixes http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30486
(Unlike the patch attached to that bug, this one doesn't
also ask the
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Dmitry Timoshkov dmi...@baikal.ru wrote:
+ /* In some apps, the hotkey doesn't draw unless we invalidate it here
*/
+ InvalidateRect(infoPtr-hwndSelf, NULL, FALSE);
It doesn't make sense to invalidate before painting in the paint
handler.
Looking
-#elif defined(HAVE_SYS_SYSCTL_H) defined(IPCTL_STATS)
(HAVE_STRUCT_IPSTAT_IPS_TOTAL || HAVE_STRUCT_IP_STATS_IPS_TOTAL)
+#elif defined(HAVE_SYS_SYSCTL_H) defined(IPCTL_STATS)
(defined(HAVE_STRUCT_IPSTAT_IPS_TOTAL) ||
defined(HAVE_STRUCT_IP_STATS_IPS_TOTAL))
Isn't this a no-op? I thought that
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Francois Gouget fgou...@free.fr wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, Dan Kegel wrote:
Isn't this a no-op? I thought that an undefined symbol was
treated as false by the preprocessor.
Actually you may be right. But then this is the only place in Wine where
we rely
Alexandre wrote:
It's common practice to avoid it, to make things like -Wundef more useful.
Good point.
Reading http://ozlabs.org/~rusty/index.cgi/tech/2008-01-04.html makes
me sad. -Wundef would be a lot more useful if autoconf defined symbols
to zero instead of undefining them; then we could
John asked
[ How do I launch Windows apps from Unix apps and pass filenames to them?]
execl (the_path_to_wine, wine, path_to_the_windows_program,
command_line_parameter_for_windows_app, NULL);
Relative unix paths will often work with Windows apps, but
in general, you will have to translate
John wrote:
from what Hin-Tak said earlier, it sounds like Wine itself will translate any
paths that I pass as a command line parameter (or did I misunderstand that?)
Example:
wine notepad /home/dank/foo.txt
This fails because notepad treats / as the beginning of an
option (see
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Frédéric Delanoy
frederic.dela...@gmail.com wrote:
Wouldn't it be better (and more acceptable for people
disliking/wanting to avoid mono) to
- keep install-gecko.sh as is
- create install-mono.sh
- create wine-install-addons.sh calling the former
?
The
I stopped doing
make test on my machine some time ago
Bad developer, no donut :-)
, when I found out that some
tests do consistently fail on my machine (clean prefix or not), and
others consistently hang, thus preventing make test -k.
I had the same problem, and wrote a little script to
I see the Humble Indie Bundle includes a game ported via wine,
http://zcint.co.uk/article/limbo-on-linux-incites-humble-bundle-petition
That's pretty cool, but not everyone agrees, and somebody has started
circulating an anti-wine petition.
So I put together a pro-wine petition:
Berillions wrote:
the other petition does have a point about Wine not doing as well with
sound as it should.
Yes, there are some issues.
For the record, here are a couple links to people talking about their
problems with the game:
http://askubuntu.com/questions/144915/limbo-game-has-no-sound
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote:
This comes up in one form or the other very often, though, doesn't it?
Company x releases software y with a Wine wrapper advertising native linux
support and users get upset. Personally, I'm glad they're thinking about
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
wget
http://download.microsoft.com/download/3/2/2/3224B87F-CFA0-4E70-BDA3-3DE650EFEBA5/vcredist_x64.exe
wine vcredist_x64
installs fine... but only puts anything in c:\windows\syswow64,
And the things it puts there are 64 bit
16.05.2012 17:34, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
If the user didn't have to manually do anything, it should be rated
platinum.
Agreed.
appdb ratings are from the point of view of someone who simply
uses their linux distro to install wine, and then tries to install a
game. If no fiddling is required,
Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
-Application works flawlessly with some DLL overrides, other settings
or third party software.
+Application works flawlessly with some DLL overrides, some patches
applied, other settings or third party software.
Really? IMHO they should still be silver. Patches are very
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Alexey Loukianov mooro...@mail.ru wrote:
Really? IMHO they should still be silver. Patches are very hard for the
average user to deploy without a third party front end like POL, and appdb
is not about POL. - Dan
I thinks that using silver won't be correct
I'd like to try a real 64 bit app, so on a 64 bit Ubuntu 12.04, I tried
sudo apt-get install wine
rm -rf ~/.wine
export WINEARCH=win64
wget
http://download.microsoft.com/download/3/2/2/3224B87F-CFA0-4E70-BDA3-3DE650EFEBA5/vcredist_x64.exe
wine vcredist_x64
and that installs fine... but
I suspect most people don't use IDEs with wine.
Someone recently posted how to use eclipse during debugging, though:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2012-April/095162.html
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 9:26 PM, wy...@volny.cz wrote:
winetricks settings alldlls=builtin
further checking revealed, that winetricks(20120308) has several no
longer available dll override compared to winecfg and some are
missing, thus application uses them as native.
So i add/del dlls from
What's the standard procedure for building both 32 and 64
bit wine together on Ubuntu 12.10?
Sadly, it seems you can't install both 32 and 64 bit development
files at the same time.
And trying to use a 32 bit chroot is awkward because wine's build
system tries to use the 64 bit makedep from
I'm bringing a new intern up to speed, and while I was
showing him how to diagnose one particular wine bug,
I recorded the session on a web page,
http://kegel.com/wine/bug30486.html
It occurred to me that recorded sessions like that
might be useful to other beginners (above and
beyond the more
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Lucas Zawacki lfzawa...@gmail.com wrote:
When I first started to learn about wine development I stumbled across
some examples exactly like these in the wine wiki. A quick search
reveals them (the first 3)
http://wiki.winehq.org/ARM says commands like
$ qemu-i386 /usr/local/qemu-i386/wine/bin/wine
/usr/local/qemu-i386/wine/c/Program\ Files/putty.exe
used to work, but doesn't anymore.
I gave it a shot anyway, just trying to run x86 apps inside wine inside qemu:
wget
1 - 100 of 2823 matches
Mail list logo
