On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 09:37:12PM -0500, Austin English wrote:
It serves no purpose, after all, 'FIXME's are not bugs'.
Done.
Jan
Thanks to Jeff Zaroyko, who went through the bounce mail, I just
disabled sending bug mail to a few bugzilla accounts.
Anyone who is affected by this and has fixed his mail reception
can ask an bugzilla admin to enable it again (e.g. by mailing me
directly).
Jan
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 05:39:53PM +0100, Kai Blin wrote:
On Sunday 22 March 2009 17:29:33 Igor Tarasov wrote:
Maybe add openid support and let users connect existing accouts to one
openid?
We decided to go for a secure system, if at all. OpenID was discussed and
quickly dropped at the
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 09:46:20AM +0100, Kai Blin wrote:
since SSL support sort of works, we're getting a large amount of SSL-related
bugs. As I don't deal with the SSL-implementation at all, could some Bugzilla
admin remove me as defauly assignee for secur32 bugs again?
done.
It wasn't easy to fish out the Information in this one *hint* :)
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:07:42AM -0600, Austin English wrote:
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmi...@codeweavers.com
2009-01-13 08:40:35 ---
REMIND is not an appropriate resolution in Wine bugzilla.
--- Comment #6 from
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 01:01:02PM -0700, Erich Hoover wrote:
Done, I don't know who maintains http://www.winehq.org/sending_patches
but that might be worth mentioning there - I always pull out that
guide since I do not submit very often.
It's in another git repo (see
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 07:39:33PM +0100, Francois Gouget wrote:
grumpy ex-reader
And as far as I know, in the 10 years since LWN started, there has been
exactly one LWN article about Wine. For the 1.0 release, in the
Development section.
Sure they carry the Wine announcements, and
The git repository contains version 3.0.4 but bugs.winehq.org
still shows 3.0.2 . Can anyone who has access to it look after
that?
Thanks.
Jan
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 12:58:44AM -0700, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
2008/4/22 Vitaliy Margolen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well that will affect closed bugs - which is not good. However I don't have
a strong objection here - whatever works. It would be even better if we can
add the version
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 02:28:15PM -0500, James Hawkins wrote:
On behalf of the regular bugzilla moderators (of which there are very
few), I'll go over the policy we have in place to keep, or strive to
attain, a manageable bugzilla database. There are only a few
conditions that warrant
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 12:49:55PM -0400, Susan Cragin wrote:
Back to the initial question:
Given what we have existing, right now, is there any set of instructions or
workarounds that makes WINE apps work best?
even
killall pulseaudio ??
Yes, stopping PA and using alsa directly probably
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 05:23:50PM -0400, Bryan Haskins wrote:
Sorry for the double post. But further on that point, at the sound system
neutral level, naming eahc app individually as a sound item would rock. In
such a way that each app perhaps talks to ALSA directly, which results in
self
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 01:46:18AM +0200, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 2. April 2008 17:08:06 schrieb Bryan Haskins:
I'm more interested in a direct pulseaudio gateway for Wine... since by
application sound control is the biggest thing here for most people
wine is treated as one
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 11:02:54AM -0400, Susan Cragin wrote:
ALSA lib pcm.c:2106:(snd_pcm_open_conf) Cannot open shared library
/usr/lib/alsa-lib/libasound_module_pcm_pulse.so
ALSA lib pcm.c:2106:(snd_pcm_open_conf) Cannot open shared library
/usr/lib/alsa-lib/libasound_module_pcm_pulse.so
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 02:39:07PM +0100, Ben Hodgetts wrote:
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Please do not use Reply-To: header when posting wine-devel.
I'm sorry, but why not? Isn't that the bext way to indicate
that I would prefer to have replies sent to the list
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 05:41:05PM +0200, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
Am Sonntag, 6. April 2008 12:27:51 schrieb Jan Zerebecki:
Yes, more precicely it's about how the alsa-pulse plugin tries to
identify different applications. It gets the real process name (the
loader), not the one wine changed
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 12:49:53PM -0500, John Klehm wrote:
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Jan Zerebecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It results in the behaviour that the user would expect. E.g. that one
game you start retains the same settings everytime it creates a primary
buffer (thus
All our Bugzilla administrators can give that permission to others.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 07:51:25AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 1:44 AM, Austin English [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought Dan also had quite a few
bugzilla privs. If not,
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 02:45:47PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
[Somebody is already working on reg.exe.]
Does that mean the project is no longer free for grabs?
It depends. The SoC staff frown on joint projects, but
it's possible.
It seem that Andrew Riedi, the author of the reg.exe stub
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 10:45:43AM -0700, Lei Zhang wrote:
Would it be helpful for the wine executable to have a --show-config
option? It can show information such as:
* what options are not compiled in
* the version of gcc, fontforge used
* whether gecko is installed
* what dlls are set
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:13:42AM +1100, Alistair Leslie-Hughes wrote:
Can I please get Privs on Bugzilla to help with the msxml work I am doing?
done.
Jan
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 04:23:46PM +0100, Christoph Frick wrote:
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 03:35:11PM +0100, Kai Blin wrote:
No argument on the US part. I'm still convinced that by EU laws,
you're allowed to crack an app you bought in order to make it run on
your software. As this hasn't
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 12:05:46PM +0100, Tomas Carnecky wrote:
All wine apps are identified as 'ALSA plug-in [wine-preloader]' in the
PA daemon, so you can't set per-app volume and sinks since all wine apps
show up under the same name. That is a technical limitation of the alsa
plugin and
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 01:50:09AM +0100, Tomas Carnecky wrote:
nifty features, like per-app volume, transparent sink switching
etc, some of which are impossible to emulate through the alsa
pulse plugin.
Which features can't be used through the alsa-pulse plugin? And
is there any technical
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:55:26AM -0600, Austin English wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:32 AM, TheBlunderbuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
marco wrote:
I can make a separate package of gecko
This sounds good to me, but lets not compartmentalize wine too much,
like Debian.
Who wants
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 11:52:56PM -0600, James Hawkins wrote:
On Jan 28, 2008 1:12 PM, Austin English [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just finished moving over the last of the obsolete components.
_obsolete_binary, _obsolete_directx, and _obsolete_gui can all be
removed now.
Done.
rename:
Because it was asked:
We have to move all (including closed) bugs from a component into
others to remove that component. If an component is not empty
when it's removed all it's bugs also get removed.
But there is also the possibility to just leave obsolete
components around forever.
Jan
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 11:42:19AM -0700, James Hawkins wrote:
On Jan 6, 2008 9:55 AM, Jan Zerebecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Changes which IMHO should not be done:
wine-help - hhctrl - Help viewer implementation
help is currently not for the various help APIs but for user
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:53:39AM +, Luke Bratch wrote:
Whilst on the subject of Bugzilla email settings, is
it possible to add a message to Bugzilla emails asking
users not to reply, but to post in Bugzilla?
Yes, the templates for the emails are in git with the rest of
bugzilla. We just
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 02:33:48PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
On Jan 9, 2008 2:28 PM, Maarten Lankhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I recall correctly, it was changed to globalwatcher because wine-bugs
wouldn't receive a copy of bug changes any more if the bug wasn't
assigned to him and you
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 04:32:20PM -0700, James McKenzie wrote:
Jan Zerebecki wrote:
It might make sense to rename Abandoned? to needmoreinfo, so
that one can key a bug as needmoreinfo and after x month with
that keyword and no response resolve it abandoned.
Though we probably don't
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:55:12PM -0700, James Hawkins wrote:
On Jan 5, 2008 6:36 PM, Jan Zerebecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 03:32:10PM -0700, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
Jan Zerebecki wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 09:11:17AM -0700, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
Where
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:59:52PM -0700, James Hawkins wrote:
On Jan 5, 2008 7:02 PM, Jan Zerebecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 01:19:35AM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
Maybe add a resolution of NEEDMOREINFO?
There is no need to add one more reason for a bug
I'm done with one step of the changes.
See the following URLs for how things currently look:
http://bugs.winehq.org/describekeywords.cgi
http://bugs.winehq.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Wine
Improvement suggestions are welcome.
Does anyone know how the CVS/GIT version is marked so that it
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 07:48:42AM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
Is it to make it show up first in the list?
Yes.
Jan
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 03:32:10PM -0700, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
Jan Zerebecki wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 09:11:17AM -0700, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
Where did our buzilla admins go? 3 weeks and nothing is changing!
If we have only one bugzilla admin and we can not get any response
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 01:19:35AM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
Maybe add a resolution of NEEDMOREINFO?
There is no need to add one more reason for a bug resolution IMHO,
INVALID with appropriate comment does the job.
INVALID seems harsh, it may scare away novice reporters.
Yes if it's used
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 05:49:14PM -0700, James McKenzie wrote:
Austin English wrote:
On Dec 31, 2007 6:10 PM, Maarten Lankhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The situation isn't improved by the fact that bugs are reopened by those
persons after minimal additions. Perhaps we should have a bug
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 09:11:17AM -0700, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
Where did our buzilla admins go? 3 weeks and nothing is changing!
I'd assume you mean the category changes to bugzilla (I just sent
a mail regarding that), otherwise please help me out on what I
missed.
Jan
For me with this renaming is important that at least from the
description it should then be absolutely clear what goes into a
component and what not (for a developer).
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 09:27:52PM -0700, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
What's happened to the proposal to remove the wine- prefix
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 09:09:14PM +, L. Rahyen wrote:
On Tuesday November 6 2007 19:45, Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
Bugzilla admin, please disallow people to add/remove e-mail addresses
to/from bugs unless they've been given that right. Or at least have rights
to modify any aspect of the
I now tested wine (and mplayer) with pulseaudio through the alsa
plugin and it worked just fine. I'm positively impressed by
pulseaudio. The bug with alsa where it played random noise at the
start because the buffer was not correctly cleared also doesn't
appear with this setup. The winmm wave test
This comes up from time to time, the solution is always compile a
winelib app with winegcc then use sockets or something to communicate.
In your server app you can use windows and linux code mixed together.
If you don't need to use linux APIs in your windows application
you can also make a
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 01:36:01AM -0500, Steven Edwards wrote:
I used to just be able to
search as follows
wine-patches Steven Edwards
and see every patch I ever submitted to wine.
For searching mailinglists I found http://search.gmane.org/ (e.g.
use gmane.comp.emulators.wine.patches as
I didn't test pulseaudio nor looked at your .asoundrc , but there
are some non-obvious pitfalls when configuring such stuff in
.asoundrc . But the fault may also be that the pulseaudio alsa
plugin doesn't fully behave like normal alsa does. Wine is pretty
sensitive to such things (even to e.g.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 11:34:33AM -0400, Tom Wickline wrote:
My goal is to provide a forum to bring Wine users together into a
single meeting place to discuss anything relevant to the daily
happenings surrounding Wine.
Does that mean you will make it synchronise with the user mailinglist?
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 02:53:19PM +0200, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
This is how your mail arrived at the mailing list archive as far as I can see:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-October/045287.html
It seems that is a problem with pipermail. It displays fine with
mutt (from local
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 01:29:03PM +0200, Jan Zerebecki wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 02:53:19PM +0200, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
This is how your mail arrived at the mailing list archive as far as I can
see:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-October/045287.html
It seems
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 12:22:35AM +0200, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes wrote:
On Sunday 21 October 2007 21:11:53 Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
Jan Zerebecki wrote:
No. Let me rephrase what vitamin already said: I accepted a
request he made but the only effect was that it was removed from
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 12:12:27PM +0200, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes wrote:
On Saturday 20 October 2007 19:40:48 Tony Lambregts wrote:
I know that maintainer requests have gone through and are working but
apparently there has to be something wrong with this, since you are not the
only one
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 01:32:32PM -0500, Alex Waite wrote:
Awhile ago I sent a few patches in to cleanup some HTML and CSS on
WineHQ. I didn't continue with writing more patches since it seemed
like we didn't have a clear idea of what direction we wanted to pursue.
I am more than happy to
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 11:09:53AM -0500, James Hawkins wrote:
On 10/12/07, Francois Gouget [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Steven Edwards wrote:
One more issue to raise: is the reason why we have 'wine-' as the prefix
to avoid conflicts between different products? That is,
I agree the wine- prefix should be removed.
Currently we have quite some categories where I don't really know
how they are defined, so the description should be enhanced so
there is no confusion over what goes in them.
Currently we have some categories that exactly fit to one dll and
some
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 03:52:36PM -0500, James Hawkins wrote:
On 10/10/07, Louis Lenders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
E.g. there is wine-quartz (one dll dlls/quartz/ ) and
wine-directx-dshow (includes dlls/{quartz,msdmo,qcap}/ ).
Well, the common (newbie) user probably won't know
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 06:22:19PM -0500, King InuYasha wrote:
While PulseAudio can work through ALSA, it makes you lose the finer grains
of control over audio when it is sent through ALSA to PulseAudio.
Then it seems that is a limitation of the alsa plugin pulseaudio
provides. Fixing that
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 01:10:43AM -0700, Scott Ritchie wrote:
Sometimes we have bugs directly related to our packaging. It would be
nice to have a bugzilla component for them, and perhaps automatically
subscribe the package maintainers.
We could add a new product Wine packages and add a
I agree that wineoss needs to remain.
I don't remember anymore if there was still some reason for
keeping wineesd.
Both jack and pulseaudio can provide alsa support for
applications. So in principle there is no reason for direct
support in wine for either of them.
We might be able to get trough
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 12:02:18AM -0500, Clarence Risher wrote:
PS: I too have been the victim of heavy handed channel administration
in #winehq.
If anyone is interested in making #winehq a place that is more
pleasant, I would urge them to try to accomplish what I suggest
in the last paragraph
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 02:07:02PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
Should we modify our Bugzilla to hide email addresses at least a little?
I'd like that myself, and users request it occasionally.
Just now, somebody asked that he be removed from
bugzilla because it doesn't do this.
Afaik this is not
as the participants
make it.
On Thursday 16 August 2007 20:27:04 Jonathan Challinger wrote:
Jan Zerebecki, I'd be happy to help, but how? I could develop some
guidelines and rules for admins to follow,
Though formulating proper communication guidelines is some work
(one can borrow text and wisdom from
[16T07:04:50] Pie-rate any admins of #winehq in here other than
vitamin? i'd like to report abuse of admin privileges. here is
the conversation, judge it however you like:
http://pastebin.ca/659216
[16T07:09:29] Amorphous Pie-rate, we currently have no rules in
place for channel admins or for
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 12:02:17PM -0700, Juan Lang wrote:
What do you think of my most recent suggestion, that the Root store
should not read from the registry, but should read from certs
installed locally, where the path to them is set in the registry?
I guess that is a good and felxible
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 01:10:58PM +0200, Roderick Colenbrander wrote:
On Saturday 11 August 2007 13:07, Dan Kegel wrote:
Why are all our new bugs cc'd to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I suspect that's a default that needs to be removed...
In the #winehackers channel there's now a bot which notifies
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 02:12:13AM -0400, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
Is it possible to put it on sourceforge like the gecko engine?
And download it whenever necessary.
The problem with that is that what we want to download here are
certificates. So for them to be of good use one needs to obtain
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 07:00:11AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
Stories like this
http://blahblahblahblag.blogspot.com/2007/07/good-reason-to-have-antivirus-on-your.html
make me think we really need to get that integrated.
It might also be useful to have a guide on how to use SELinux to
confine a
The usual disclaimer, IANAL, yadda yadda.
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 10:55:38PM +0200, Stefan Dösinger wrote:
Hypothetial:
Assumed ddraw.dll was signed by Microsoft. Now we have an app that checks for
this signature, and refuses to run otherwise. This app is not part of wine,
and it is not
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 06:00:37PM -0700, Austin English wrote:
I too, lack the permissions to triage bugs. But I'll leave that
for the devs to decide.
I don't know you so I'll wait a bit more...
I just have quite a bit of spare time to debug, along with a
few machines to do the testing.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 10:47:02AM +0200, Kai Blin wrote:
On Wednesday 27 June 2007 05:16:02 Jan Zerebecki wrote:
Btw. the idea is to upgrade the server to Sarge shortly before
the Bugzilla upgrade.
Don't you rather mean Etch? Debian stables get old enough as is, no need to
use
I hereby announce that with the upgrade of Bugzilla we will use
Git for what the bugzilla cvs module is currently used (if
nothing unforeseen prevents this).
This can be seen as a test for also moving our other remaining
CVS modules.
Anyone who has a problem with this should speak up now.
Btw.
The web page is a bit sparse, so does calysto offer anything
special e.g. anything that distinguishes it from coverity? Is it
free software?
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 03:05:33PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
Domagoj wrote:
http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~babic/index_calysto_community.htm
2) if the conditions
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 01:36:09PM +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Evan Stade [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
+static const INT drawline_bmp1[192] =
+{0x,0x,0x,0x,0x,0x,0x,
I don't think we want to do that sort of thing. We can't guarantee
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 09:47:31PM +0200, RusH wrote:
So in summary, could someone please add a simple _svn update git
replacement_ to the wiki?
git fetch origin
git reset --hard origin
Notice that you will loose all changes (contrary to svn update), even the ones
you commited.
Not that we
I'm not sure there is a agreement what some things here mean. The
following is my understanding of things, please correct me or
state differing understanding:
triage bugs: Make sure the bug is properly filed, has enough
information and possibly uncover the cause (e.g. regression
testing, finding
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 10:58:51PM +0400, Kirill K. Smirnov wrote:
I do not receive mail from wine-patches mail list. Thus, to get the patch
sent with MIME text/plain I use select/copy/paste/save technique. If patch is
not text/plain, I just use save link target option in browser.
You
Please do _only_ address replies to this email to
wine-devel@winehq.org ! Remove all other recipients from To and
Cc !
Work is currently underway to restore the state of the Appdb to
the backup of May 22 07:00 CST.
This morning ( TZ +0200 ) someone used the account Molle
Bestefich to vandalize
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 09:01:17AM -0500, Tom Spear wrote:
On 5/22/07, Jan Zerebecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would consider neither of hang, stuck, 100% cpu usage, freeze
to be a crash.
Out of curiosity, why not?
It's probably the narrow definition from the POV of someone who
thinks
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 06:13:25PM -0500, EA Durbin wrote:
does fraps not work in wine?
http://appdb.winehq.org/appview.php?iVersionId=5065
Last I tested it crashed on startup:
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5601 .
Jan
I'll ask what the progress is with our Bugzilla upgrade when
the one who offered this comes online again.
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 03:25:40PM -0500, Tom Spear wrote:
On 5/22/07, Robert Shearman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Searching for Unhandled exception is too hard?
Not all bugs have a proper
The guy (nick mkanat) who admins buggbot on freenode (see
##bugzilla-world ) said he would upgrade our bugzilla for us,
paid by his company in exchange for a link in the footer or
front page, just mentioning that we did the upgrade.
I'm not sure how much a link on the bugzilla page footer/menu is
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 10:11:36AM -0500, Aric Stewart wrote:
All the delays and such are all behind winetest_debug checks so when run
in an programmatic way they will not be triggered allowing the test to
run without supervision.
Wine tests should be automatic unless winetest_interactive. I
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 08:10:37PM +, Louis Lenders wrote:
BTW, could someone please add these categories like dbghelp, urlmon, quartz
etc
to bugzilla? has been requested a few times but no response yet :(
I would say dbghelp is part of wine-debug and quartz is part of
wine-directx-dshow.
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 12:43:57PM +1000, Jeff L wrote:
James Hawkins wrote:
I don't know which is better, a lot of files appearing in my home or a
new directory. Lots of apps create directories to organise files and we
take it on the chin.
I don't like either, so after a wineprefixcreate
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 09:33:41PM -0400, Dimi Paun wrote:
On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 15:52 -0700, Scott Ritchie wrote:
I've pasted the content from the FAQ onto the wiki here:
I really don't think this is a good idea:
* it's going to be less usable on the Wiki AFAIK
* we'll lose the other
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 02:56:33AM -0700, Scott Ritchie wrote:
How come I
can't set winecfg to make a virtual desktop for just this application,
Did you try with explorer as described at
http://wiki.winehq.org/DesktopWindow ?
Jan
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 10:06:19PM +1200, Wesley Parish wrote:
I was wondering, there is Wine, there is CrossOver, and there is Cedega.
CrossOver I know contribute their source back, I don't know about Cedega
Since wine 0.9 someone with transgaming in the author field got
3 patches into wine.
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 09:09:18AM +0200, Roderick Colenbrander wrote:
While the functionality you mentioned might be broken at the moment the
following might also be useful: http://wiki.winehq.org/Debug_trace_toggle_key
The patch adds a key using which you can enable/disable debugmessages.
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 02:38:42PM +0200, Frank Russo wrote:
This
way I can donate $5 per month, have it go directly to WINE development
efforts (not beer, parties, conferences, etc), and have it pulled
directly from an account that I hold (since I do not use Paypal for
numerous reasons).
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 12:59:21AM -0500, Marty Schmidt wrote:
I can not open the attachment on this message
It looks fine from skimming it:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.wine.patches/35452
Or look at the raw message and copypaste attached diff:
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 04:37:54AM +0300, Oleh R. Nykyforchyn wrote:
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The main question is this - is anyone today already working on this?
I do it for three years with almost zero responce from Wine team. See, e.g.,
my post to wine-devel, Mon, 13 Nov
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 03:17:35PM -0700, Sasan Iman wrote:
I don't know how much effort it would take to get Office
working on Wine but if getting it to work out-of-the-box means putting
it on many more systems (leading to more people getting interested, more
mileage leading to more bug
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 02:26:58PM +0200, Frank Richter wrote:
On 29.03.2007 09:41, Tom Wickline wrote:
http://wiki.winehq.org/DirectX-Caps
It would be nice if the visual hint could
reflect that - this way a red background would be a clear signal that
this needs work.
I just highlighted the
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 10:38:26AM -0500, Mike Schaadt wrote:
Is there any interest in adding OpenAL to Wine? I would imagine it's
relatively simple to implement the OpenAL dll that would be a simple
wrap around the Linux OpenAL library assuming they have the same
functionality(from what I
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 07:05:02PM +0200, Paul Vriens wrote:
I think it will be good to have one or two more main contacts. So anyone
volunteering? There will hardly be any work involved (I hope). Mainly
dealing with approving new accounts and communicating things back to the
Wine
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 07:39:01AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
Alexandre wrote:
[removed list of many features wanted for 1.0]
Not that it matters, but it doesn't seem important to me what
features go into a 1.0 release. But something like a stable
branch could be something realy usefull for many
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 08:29:03AM -0500, Tom Spear wrote:
hmm. I looked in the shell32 source (0.9.33), and I don't see it in
the function that creates the Desktop and My Documents and co folders,
and its not getting created when I run wineprefixcreate. Should I
open a bug?
At some point
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 09:32:54AM -0500, Tom Spear wrote:
On 3/22/07, Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Winecfg should probably not allow moving the C drive; if you really
want that, you have to know what you are doing, and do it by hand. Why
do you want to move it at all?
Yes,
I Cc-ed Karl Lattimer from Wine-Doors to also ask him if the
provisions detailed here are also compatible with his views of
Wine-Doors.
Something like Winebot could possibly save me much time while
testing and developing. I reinstalled certain applications or
workarounds countless times,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 10:03:46PM -0600, James Hawkins wrote:
If developers working on projects such as Wine-Doors
contributed to Wine, then the bugs would be fixed even faster.
I think that this is not necessarily (always) true, probably not
even most of the time.
Does a developer of e.g.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:24:23PM -0500, Tom Spear wrote:
Well, Im just wanting to have winecfg run wineprefixcreate after the
ok and apply buttons are pressed, so that the files and folders
created by wineprefixcreate are created in the location of the fake c
drive (in the event a user moved
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
