Nikolay Sivov bungleh...@gmail.com writes:
Paul Vriens wrote:
Not sure for the reason. But one thing I don't like is that this
comctl32/msg.c (with no actual tests itself) is also shown on
test.winehq.org.
Could we get rid of .c file here and move messaging test helpers to
header only? It's
2009/8/10 Owen Rudge oru...@codeweavers.com:
This is the first of a series of patches to implement the IImageList
interface into comctl32, introduced in comctl32 v6.
This first patch splits the routines for loading v6 of comctl32
(requiring a side-by-side manifest) out of the listview tests
Henri Verbeet wrote:
2009/8/10 Owen Rudge oru...@codeweavers.com:
This is the first of a series of patches to implement the IImageList
interface into comctl32, introduced in comctl32 v6.
This first patch splits the routines for loading v6 of comctl32
(requiring a side-by-side manifest) out
2009/8/11 Nikolay Sivov bungleh...@gmail.com:
Henri Verbeet wrote:
I don't know if there's any reason these tests should be an exception,
but the general rule is that tests are supposed to be contained within
their own file, to allow for easy compilation.
He didn't move any tests but only
Henri Verbeet wrote:
2009/8/11 Nikolay Sivov bungleh...@gmail.com:
Henri Verbeet wrote:
I don't know if there's any reason these tests should be an exception,
but the general rule is that tests are supposed to be contained within
their own file, to allow for easy compilation.
He didn't move
2009/8/11 Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com:
FWIW, these comctl32 tests also already rely on msg.c for all the message
related tests.
It's probably not much of an issue here then.
2009/8/11 Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com:
Henri Verbeet wrote:
2009/8/11 Nikolay Sivov bungleh...@gmail.com:
Henri Verbeet wrote:
I don't know if there's any reason these tests should be an exception,
but the general rule is that tests are supposed to be contained within
their own
Reece Dunn wrote:
2009/8/11 Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com:
Henri Verbeet wrote:
2009/8/11 Nikolay Sivov bungleh...@gmail.com:
Henri Verbeet wrote:
I don't know if there's any reason these tests should be an exception,
but the general rule is that tests are supposed to be contained
Paul Vriens wrote:
Reece Dunn wrote:
2009/8/11 Paul Vriens paul.vriens.w...@gmail.com:
Henri Verbeet wrote:
2009/8/11 Nikolay Sivov bungleh...@gmail.com:
Henri Verbeet wrote:
I don't know if there's any reason these tests should be an
exception,
but the general rule is that tests are
Not sure for the reason. But one thing I don't like is that this
comctl32/msg.c (with no actual tests itself) is also shown on
test.winehq.org.
That is something that unfortunately does happen with v6util, too
(v6util shows itself as another test in the test list). However, I
thought it
10 matches
Mail list logo
