On 04/19/2010 01:23 AM, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
On Fr, 2010-04-16 at 08:57 +0200, Paul Vriens wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to just check for one (or all) and bail out with
a (only one) win_skip()? I guess if one is not present, none are?
The checks are in different test files and some tests
On Fr, 2010-04-16 at 08:57 +0200, Paul Vriens wrote:
Wouldn't it be better to just check for one (or all) and bail out with
a (only one) win_skip()? I guess if one is not present, none are?
The checks are in different test files and some tests work on W95B
(IE 4)
I prefer to have a complete
On 04/16/2010 12:20 AM, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
---
dlls/urlmon/tests/sec_mgr.c | 29 +
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Hi Detlef,
After this patch none of the tests are actually run on W95B and we have
loads of win_skip's.
Wouldn't it
