Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
Why do we need the static?
Had I pasted more source code, you would have known why.
LONG ALSA_WaveInit(void)
{
snd_pcm_t* h = NULL;
snd_pcm_info_t *info;
snd_pcm_hw_params_t * hw_params;
WINE_WAVEOUT* wwo;
Index: dlls/winmm/winealsa/audio.c
===
RCS file: /home/wine/wine/dlls/winmm/winealsa/audio.c,v
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -r1.20 audio.c
--- dlls/winmm/winealsa/audio.c22 Sep 2003 21:13:33 - 1.20
+++
Was something like this already applied to CVS ?
This could explain why I got garbage into winealsa for the device
names.
+chardevice[] = hw;
I think it should be
static char device[] = hw;
Why is that? In fact, I think it shouldn't, if it
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On October 11, 2003 03:42 am, Jerry Jenkins wrote:
+chardevice[] = hw;
I think it should be
static char device[] = hw;
Why is that? In fact, I think it shouldn't, if it
gets modified during the call, we'll end up passing
On October 12, 2003 01:00 am, Jerry Jenkins wrote:
If we keep device[], we need the static
keyword to make winealsa work.
Why do we need the static?
--
Dimi.
