On 2013-07-01 06:13+0100 Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
[...]In terms of relative importance, consider that mingw (both native and cross) GNU toolchain works well,
the toolchain part of cygwin is hardly a priority.
Once again you are implying the MinGW GNU toolchain is better than the
Cygwin GNU
--- On Mon, 1/7/13, Alan W. Irwin ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca wrote:
... I hope your negative
attitude
toward the Cygwin toolchain is not typical of such
developers. After
all, even though the Windows GNU toolchain code bases have
diverged
between the two groups of developers, there is still
On 2013-07-01 19:58+0100 Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
--- On Mon, 1/7/13, Alan W. Irwin ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca wrote:
... I hope your negative
attitude
toward the Cygwin toolchain is not typical of such
developers. After
all, even though the Windows GNU toolchain code bases have
diverged
between
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Alan W. Irwin ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca wrote:
On 2013-07-01 19:58+0100 Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
--- On Mon, 1/7/13, Alan W. Irwin ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca wrote:
... I hope your negative
attitude
toward the Cygwin toolchain is not typical of such
developers.
