Re: Fix for bug 640 - moving thin frames leaves mess

2003-09-29 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Alexandre Julliard wrote: Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Patch for cmdlgtst.c to produce those pictures is attached. before.png was taken with current Wine. after.png is with the fix that removes the special procession of R2_XORPEN. I would not say that

Re: Fix for bug 640 - moving thin frames leaves mess

2003-09-29 Thread Sylvain Petreolle
What Paintbrush are you using ? Im using winme's and got no such problem when saving images (no natives are used except mfc42and mfc42loc) But I have another big problem : if anything is modified, the whole image becomes a black square when saved. Paintbrush won't exit without saving.

Re: Fix for bug 640 - moving thin frames leaves mess

2003-09-28 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Alexandre Julliard wrote: 3) Black pen, white background, pattern, opaque mode. The background would still be changing the image. If we consider the pen white, the pattern would be lost. I actually didn't test it, but I expect it to be broken. I don't see how a

Re: Fix for bug 640 - moving thin frames leaves mess

2003-09-28 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Patch for cmdlgtst.c to produce those pictures is attached. before.png was taken with current Wine. after.png is with the fix that removes the special procession of R2_XORPEN. I would not say that nobody will use this effect. Anyway, the whole thing

Re: Fix for bug 640 - moving thin frames leaves mess

2003-09-27 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Alexandre Julliard wrote: Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I also included a patch that removes special treatment for R2_XORPEN with black pen. I don't see such behavior in Windows 2000. I also tested Paintbrush from Windows 3.11 and it has no graphical

Re: Fix for bug 640 - moving thin frames leaves mess

2003-09-27 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've retested paintbrush on the 8-but display and I see no difference. The reasons are: 1) I invested time into testing XOR operations on Windows 2000 and found no magic interpretation for the black pen. It's invisible in Windows. Well yes, that's

Re: Fix for bug 640 - moving thin frames leaves mess

2003-09-26 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I also included a patch that removes special treatment for R2_XORPEN with black pen. I don't see such behavior in Windows 2000. I also tested Paintbrush from Windows 3.11 and it has no graphical problems except Pick-Tilt, which is unaffected by this

Re: Fix for bug 640 - moving thin frames leaves mess

2003-09-25 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On September 25, 2003 02:54 pm, Pavel Roskin wrote: We probably need another program to test GDI functions. Ideally, screenshots from Wine an Windows should match to the pixel. That will be a lot of wasted time for no good reason. I don't think we need, or that is advisable to have

Re: Fix for bug 640 - moving thin frames leaves mess

2003-09-25 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Alexandre Julliard wrote: Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: OK, drop that part of the patch for now. I think that xoring anything with COLOR_WINDOWTEXT is incorrect, but I need to test possible other solutions. After all, the bug is about the white mess from