Re: Would like to get some feedback on GSOC idea

2012-03-29 Thread Juan Lang
, and became very interested in Cryptography. After looking over the suggested ideas on SOC official wine wiki I was pleasantly surprised to see that there was already a crypt related idea suggested. I have a great understanding of c++ and java, and though I know c I have not worked

Re: Need suggestion to choose a GSoC idea

2012-03-27 Thread Qian Hong
, etc.). Thanks for reminder, I agree GUI testing is expensive, but I think manpower is more expensive :) However I've no idea how hard is it to get GUI testing right yet, maybe you are right, but from my view it is worth to try. I've since decided against GSoC for this year, but my idea

Re: Need suggestion to choose a GSoC idea

2012-03-27 Thread Aric Stewart
Hi, On 3/26/12 10:29 PM, Qian Hong wrote: - Improve Wine CJK font support The main idea is fix Bug 16325 [11], Aric and others have done a lot of work on it, and I'm glad to participating too. I think the main blocker for Wine CJK font support is Font Association now, is it suitable for a GSoC

Re: Need suggestion to choose a GSoC idea

2012-03-27 Thread Qian Hong
priority, maybe I'll investigate it in the future. Is it a good GSoC idea to improve font related testcase base on bitmap compares? Thank you! -- Regards, Qian Hong - Sent from Ubuntu http://www.ubuntu.com/

Would like to get some feedback on GSOC idea

2012-03-27 Thread M C
ideas on SOC official wine wiki I was pleasantly surprised to see that there was already a crypt related idea suggested. I have a great understanding of c++ and java, and though I know c I have not worked with it as much as the other languages. Implementing a DSS provider sounds like an awesome

Need suggestion to choose a GSoC idea

2012-03-26 Thread Qian Hong
with the 2012 GSoC and keep submitting patches to Wine after that. I have lots of ideas in my TODO list, unfortunately most of them might too hard to do as a GSoC project. Anyway, I'll post my ideas here, wait for feedbacks, choose one of them as my GSoC idea, and leave others as my job in the coming

Re: Need suggestion to choose a GSoC idea

2012-03-26 Thread HolyCause
Qian, - Improve Wine App install / App running testing This idea is similar with Austin's early work [18], my idea is using sikuli [19] instead of autohotkey, since sikuli is more powerful for complex work. Sikuli using tesseract as orc engine, so if we done this job we can prevent many font

Re: My Idea for GSOC

2012-03-25 Thread Daniel Oom
Hi again, so I've been messing around with this a bit and have some questions. However I'm not able to properly set up lighting/materials, I think I want a function like SetMaterial in d3d7 to activate a material with some emissive color. As for now I'm only able to get D3DVT_VERTEX and

Re: My Idea for GSOC

2012-03-25 Thread Henri Verbeet
On 25 March 2012 15:36, Daniel Oom daoo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi again, so I've been messing around with this a bit and have some questions. However I'm not able to properly set up lighting/materials, I think I want a function like SetMaterial in d3d7 to activate a material with some emissive

Re: My Idea for GSOC

2012-03-23 Thread Daniel Oom
I think I accidentally dropped wine-devel, I have re-added and hope it does not create any trouble. And thanks for the explanation, but I'm not sure I fully understand how the different versions of direct3d interact within wine's implementation. I will probably figure it out in time. Also I will

Re: My Idea for GSOC

2012-03-14 Thread Stefan Dösinger
Hi, Another idea came up in #winehackers: Implement the interesting bits of nvapi.dll, e.g. for http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id$928 . The main caveat and challenge is that we don't know much about this library. It is Nvidia-specific, and http://developer.nvidia.com/nvapi has some

Re: My Idea for GSOC

2012-03-14 Thread Henri Verbeet
On 14 March 2012 19:50, Stefan Dösinger stefandoesin...@gmail.com wrote: Another idea came up in #winehackers: Implement the interesting bits of nvapi.dll, e.g. for http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24928 . I don't think so, unless you can make a convincing argument.

Re: My Idea for GSOC

2012-03-10 Thread Stefan Dösinger
Am Samstag, 10. März 2012, 17:22:51 schrieb Daniel Oom: Hi, Writing tests, or implementing the command line tools seems like something I could do. I'm kinda leaning towards the command line tools, since it would offer a chance to thoroughly learn the shading languages. For learning purposes

Re: My Idea for GSOC

2012-03-09 Thread Stefan Dösinger
Am Donnerstag, 8. März 2012, 23:32:16 schrieb Pau Garcia i Quiles: If he is adventurous, here is another idea: A wish a day 14: Wine-based Application Virtualization http://www.elpauer.org/?p05 Wine doesn't help you too much in this(except for the cross-platform part), and the idea isn't

Re: My Idea for GSOC

2012-03-08 Thread Stefan Dösinger
Hi Daniel, Again, welcome to Wine :-) Finding good d3d-related gsoc projects has become harder each year, as the code is quite mature and we're out of easy things to fix. A few things that come to my mind are: *) Writing more tests. Especially ddraw.dll could use a lot more tests and fixes

Re: My Idea for GSOC

2012-03-08 Thread Pau Garcia i Quiles
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Vitaliy Margolen wine-de...@kievinfo.com wrote: You can find few ideas on what to do on GSOC Wiki page: http://wiki.winehq.org/SummerOfCode If he is adventurous, here is another idea: A wish a day 14: Wine-based Application Virtualization http

My Idea for GSOC

2012-03-07 Thread Daniel Oom
development and real time rendering, and have actually completed one simple game (written in Java/OpenGL). But I still have so much left to learn, and I believe I can learn a lot through working with wine in these areas. My idea, or rather how I would like to improve wine, is related to gaming. I've

Re: My Idea for GSOC

2012-03-07 Thread Vitaliy Margolen
On 03/07/2012 01:07 PM, Daniel Oom wrote: Hello, my name is Daniel Oom and I'm a computer science and engineering student at Chalmers in Gothenburg, Sweden. Welcome to Wine! Would, for example: fix Steam's in-game overlay feature be a good goal? Not really, as it's already working fine in

Re: Idea

2011-03-22 Thread Hin-Tak Leung
(Please keep the wine-devel CC:) Sanket Patel wrote: User File Location On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Hin-Tak Leung hintak_le...@yahoo.co.uk mailto:hintak_le...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Sanket Patel wrote: hi there, I talk about to make wine portable. How I am

Idea

2011-03-21 Thread Sanket Patel
hi there, I talk about to make wine portable. How I am Gonna Do That is , There is a files that are related to system and integrated in to system while install. We gonna change that system files places . How ? that is still question but we can do By community Support. If you talk about takiinng

Re: Idea

2011-03-21 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:40 AM, Sanket Patel sanketpatel@gmail.com wrote: hi there, I talk about to make wine portable. How I am Gonna Do That is , There is a files that are related to system and integrated in to system while install. We gonna change that system files places . How ?

Idea

2011-03-20 Thread Sanket Patel
I Have One Idea . Why Should not we make wine portable ? -- Live 2 Love and Love 2 Live

Re: Idea

2011-03-20 Thread Vitaliy Margolen
On 03/20/2011 12:12 PM, Sanket Patel wrote: I Have One Idea . Why Should not we make wine portable ? Elaborate in details please. How do you want to make something portable? This is not windows. Everything already can be packaged into a single binary. And if you talking about

Re: GSOC idea to implement the explorer

2011-02-24 Thread Andrew Green
Thank you for your support. I will probably make two proposals. One for theming and one for explorer. Of course my proposals will only be using c as the programming language. It looks like I have a lot of research to do before I can submit my application. On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:20 AM, Juan

Re: GSOC idea to implement the explorer

2011-02-22 Thread Juan Lang
Hi Andrew, Though I understand this is probably the lower priority on the wine developers list. As integrating into Linux desktop is probably the preferred and most used mode. I thought that sharing reactos explorer and working on making a complete explorer(including extensions) would be the

GSOC idea to implement the explorer

2011-02-20 Thread Andrew Green
running under windows I can add any extension such as Quick launch, language bar and so on. Here is a pic of my working copy(trunk doesn't have this theming yet. Though I should finish it soon) http://img156.imageshack.us/f/yaytheme.png/ This is just an idea. I know it's very incomplete. Though

Re: GSOC idea to implement the explorer

2011-02-20 Thread Roderick Colenbrander
.imageshack.us/f/yaytheme.png/ This is just an idea. I know it's very incomplete. Though it is showing promise. Here is a link to the  GSOC implement the explorer page I mentioned http://wiki.winehq.org/SummerOfCode#head-18241c95194e4e1c597bd2923cf296084fc3ba78 Any comments and ideas are much

Re: GSOC idea to implement the explorer

2011-02-20 Thread Andrew Green
I had assumed that the browser part of explorer simply hosted another control or collection of controls. Though explorer is more than a browser. It also acts like a desktop shell. Though I understand this is probably the lower priority on the wine developers list. As integrating into Linux desktop

Any idea how to solve that ?

2010-08-27 Thread GOUJON Alexandre
Hi, No one have replied for my [Spanish - Modern Sort_Spain.1252 locale on wine] mail. So I'm asking again if someone has an idea. If solved, msvcrt:locale test on wine will pass without any error. The situation is the following : setlocale(LC_ALL, esn); ok(!strcmp(ret, Spanish_Spain.1252

Re: Any idea how to solve that ?

2010-08-27 Thread GOUJON Alexandre
On 08/27/2010 09:53 AM, GOUJON Alexandre wrote: Hi, No one have replied for my [Spanish - Modern Sort_Spain.1252 locale on wine] mail. So I'm asking again if someone has an idea. If solved, msvcrt:locale test on wine will pass without any error. The situation is the following : setlocale

Re: Summer of code idea: make tiny game demos to expose problems in Wine

2010-02-23 Thread Francois Gouget
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010, Dan Kegel wrote: I've just added http://wiki.winehq.org/SummerOfCode#head-5cdc861e4369f94f0af19d09710d33d76b1f5c64 Current text: Big games are hard to debug. Small demo games show interesting problems in Wine (see e.g.

Re: Summer of code idea: make tiny game demos to expose problems in Wine

2010-02-23 Thread Roderick Colenbrander
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Francois Gouget fgou...@free.fr wrote: On Sun, 21 Feb 2010, Dan Kegel wrote: I've just added http://wiki.winehq.org/SummerOfCode#head-5cdc861e4369f94f0af19d09710d33d76b1f5c64 Current text: Big games are hard to debug. Small demo games show interesting

Re: Summer of code idea: make tiny game demos to expose problems in Wine

2010-02-23 Thread Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes
Tirsdag 23 februar 2010 14:51:09 skrev Roderick Colenbrander : On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Francois Gouget fgou...@free.fr wrote: On Sun, 21 Feb 2010, Dan Kegel wrote: I've just added http://wiki.winehq.org/SummerOfCode#head-5cdc861e4369f94f0af19d09710d33d 76b1f5c64 Current text:

Re: Summer of code idea: make tiny game demos to expose problems in Wine

2010-02-23 Thread Julius Schwartzenberg
Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes wrote: Maybe someone can work on implementing dxdiag.exe in Wine? We could add some extra tests compared to the Windows versions, and the small games could be a part of that. I'd say Wine's dxdiag should mainly run the existing DirectX tests and report any failure

Re: Summer of code idea: make tiny game demos to expose problems in Wine

2010-02-23 Thread Dan Kegel
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Francois Gouget fgou...@free.fr wrote: http://wiki.winehq.org/SummerOfCode#head-5cdc861e4369f94f0af19d09710d33d76b1f5c64 Current text: ... Let's try making the smallest possible demo games that show problems in Wine, and file bugs for what we find (along with

Re: Summer of code idea: make tiny game demos to expose problems in Wine

2010-02-23 Thread Dan Kegel
2010/2/23 Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes a...@thehandofagony.com: Maybe someone can work on implementing dxdiag.exe in Wine? We could add some extra tests compared to the Windows versions, and the small games could be a part of that. Yeah, I've updated my proposal to mention that possibility, and

Summer of code idea: make tiny game demos to expose problems in Wine

2010-02-21 Thread Dan Kegel
I've just added http://wiki.winehq.org/SummerOfCode#head-5cdc861e4369f94f0af19d09710d33d76b1f5c64 Current text: Big games are hard to debug. Small demo games show interesting problems in Wine (see e.g. http://bugs.winehq.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=3drad ) There are lots of tools (see

Re: idea: display drivers

2010-02-07 Thread Stefan Dösinger
The problem is that there can't be any Objective-C code in Wine. At all. Or C++. Or Fortran. Or Pascal. Or Ada. Or Java. Or C# or VB. Or any language other than pure, procedural C. Alexandre has said that you can put objective C code into wine, but only if this code is properly abstracted from

Re: idea: display drivers

2010-02-07 Thread James McKenzie
C.W. Betts wrote: Is is just because of the Objective-C code? Would it be safe to make C functions that would call Objective-C? Such as: cheader.h: typedef struct struct1 struct1; cfuncCreate(struct1 *s); cfunc1(); cfunc2(); cfuncDestroy (struct1 *s); cfile.m: @interface WHQFunc {

Re: idea: display drivers

2010-02-07 Thread James McKenzie
Charles Davis wrote: C.W. Betts wrote: Is is just because of the Objective-C code? Would it be safe to make C functions that would call Objective-C? Such as: cheader.h: typedef struct struct1 struct1; cfuncCreate(struct1 *s); cfunc1(); cfunc2(); cfuncDestroy (struct1 *s); cfile.m:

Re: idea: display drivers

2010-02-07 Thread James McKenzie
a Quartz driver is cleaning up the user32 driver interface. Objective C is a minor issue with a pretty straightforward solution. Currently nobody knows what a proper user32 driver interface would look like. It might be a good idea to look at the code used in other projects to get a good

Re: idea: display drivers

2010-02-07 Thread Roderick Colenbrander
Emmanuel's code is available from Sourceforge.  It is a good starting point for this.  If you want, send me what you have so far for testing purposes.  It would be great to have a native MacOSX windowing system. James McKenzie The design of the old quartz driver is not correct. I remember

Re: idea: display drivers

2010-02-07 Thread Reece Dunn
On 7 February 2010 15:02, Roderick Colenbrander thunderbir...@gmail.com wrote: Emmanuel's code is available from Sourceforge.  It is a good starting point for this.  If you want, send me what you have so far for testing purposes.  It would be great to have a native MacOSX windowing system.

Re: idea: display drivers

2010-02-07 Thread Roderick Colenbrander
x11 in the current design (adjusted a bit were possible) and one which follows the Win7-design using OpenGL. The idea would be to let Wine perform the majority of GDI calls in software (both the DIB stuff and a big part of the DDB calls). Like Win7 we would accelerate common GDI functions like

Re: idea: display drivers

2010-02-07 Thread James McKenzie
Roderick Colenbrander wrote: Emmanuel's code is available from Sourceforge. It is a good starting point for this. If you want, send me what you have so far for testing purposes. It would be great to have a native MacOSX windowing system. James McKenzie The design of the old quartz

Re: idea: display drivers

2010-02-07 Thread David Gerard
On 7 February 2010 15:40, Reece Dunn mscl...@googlemail.com wrote:  1/  Does this mean that OpenGL is required for all GDI calls, not just D3D? If so, it will exclude people who don't have OpenGL support (e.g. are using the vesa, nv, or nouveau drivers). As I understand it, current Xorg does

Re: idea: display drivers

2010-02-07 Thread Gert van den Berg
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 21:40, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote: On 7 February 2010 15:40, Reece Dunn mscl...@googlemail.com wrote:  1/  Does this mean that OpenGL is required for all GDI calls, not just D3D? If so, it will exclude people who don't have OpenGL support (e.g. are using the

Re: idea: display drivers

2010-02-07 Thread David Gerard
it. But what about other X servers, such as Xsun, Xvnc, remote Xming sessions, etc? No idea, sorry. Xsun is on extended (life-)support with Sun moving to Xorg (and Alan Coopersmith from Sun being one of the main Xorg developers). Xming is Xorg compiled for mingw. Xvnc, no idea. - d.

Re: idea: display drivers

2010-02-07 Thread Gert van den Berg
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 22:47, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote: No idea, sorry. Xsun is on extended (life-)support with Sun moving to Xorg (and Alan Coopersmith from Sun being one of the main Xorg developers). Xming is Xorg compiled for mingw Xming: An ancient version of Xorg (at least

Re: idea: display drivers

2010-02-06 Thread James McKenzie
C.W. Betts wrote: An idea that popped into my head when I was thinking about a Quartz (OS X) driver that perhaps there could be separate drivers for Quartz (OS X) and X11. Such drivers would include OpenGL and DirectX Drivers. This has been shot down time and time again by Alexandre

Re: idea: display drivers

2010-02-06 Thread Ben Klein
On 7 February 2010 01:45, James McKenzie jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net wrote: C.W. Betts wrote: An idea that popped into my head when I was thinking about a Quartz (OS X) driver that perhaps there could be separate drivers for Quartz (OS X) and X11.  Such drivers would include OpenGL

Re: idea: display drivers

2010-02-06 Thread C.W. Betts
] init]; } cfuncDestroy (struct1 *s) { [s-ObjC release]; free(s); } On Feb 6, 2010, at 7:45 AM, James McKenzie wrote: C.W. Betts wrote: An idea that popped into my head when I was thinking about a Quartz (OS X) driver that perhaps there could be separate drivers for Quartz (OS X

Re: idea: display drivers

2010-02-06 Thread Charles Davis
C.W. Betts wrote: Is is just because of the Objective-C code? Would it be safe to make C functions that would call Objective-C? Such as: cheader.h: typedef struct struct1 struct1; cfuncCreate(struct1 *s); cfunc1(); cfunc2(); cfuncDestroy (struct1 *s); cfile.m: @interface WHQFunc {

Wine fundraising idea

2009-05-01 Thread Austin English
Howdy, I was reading through a GSoC thread on how people are spending their coding money. Someone posted that they thought people should donate to miro, the internet HDTV player. They've got a pretty neat donation scheme, where people can 'adopt' a line of code, and get updates on it, etc. Pretty

Re: Wine fundraising idea

2009-05-01 Thread James Mckenzie
Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com Sent: May 1, 2009 12:39 PM To: Wine Devel wine-devel@winehq.org Subject: Wine fundraising idea Howdy, +1 James McKenzie

Re: Wine fundraising idea

2009-05-01 Thread Scott Ritchie
Austin English wrote: Howdy, I was reading through a GSoC thread on how people are spending their coding money. Someone posted that they thought people should donate to miro, the internet HDTV player. They've got a pretty neat donation scheme, where people can 'adopt' a line of code, and get

Re: [scons-dev] SOC Project Idea: Winelib-aware scons

2009-03-24 Thread Greg Noel
On Mar 22, 2009, at 4:47 AM, King InuYasha wrote: Does SCons support the project-within-a-project build style that is used in Visual Studio? ... SCons is amazingly policy-neutral, and we work to keep it that way. (It has occasionally been a bone of contention, when people have wanted us

Re: [scons-dev] SOC Project Idea: Winelib-aware scons

2009-03-24 Thread Greg Noel
On Mar 22, 2009, at 11:18 AM, Francois Gouget wrote: The Winelib tools (winebuild, winegcc, wrc, widl, etc) are actually used everyday [sic] and are under active development as they are used to build Wine itself. Ah, I didn't know that. I thought winelib was more like a replacement for

Re: SOC Project Idea: Winelib-aware scons

2009-03-24 Thread Chris Morgan
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Scott Ritchie sc...@open-vote.org wrote: For a while now I've been hoping someone would tackle a pet project of mine.  It occurred to me that it would be a great summer of code project. Basically, I want a magic script that can convert a visual studio project

Re: [scons-dev] SOC Project Idea: Winelib-aware scons

2009-03-22 Thread King InuYasha
of a planned 0.9 release in September 2005. That's more than three years of inactivity. Over the last few months it looks like you've been trying to revitalize the project, but I'm not seeing a lot of traction. If I were a student researching this idea, I'd be leery about proposing a project

Re: [scons-dev] SOC Project Idea: Winelib-aware scons

2009-03-22 Thread Francois Gouget
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009, Greg Noel wrote: [...] On the other hand, I'd wonder about viability. It doesn't look like the basic winelib information has been updated since January 2005, although there's mention of a planned 0.9 release in September 2005. That's more than three years of inactivity.

Re: SOC Project Idea: Winelib-aware scons

2009-03-21 Thread King InuYasha
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Chris Morgan chmor...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/3/21 Pau Garcia i Quiles pgqui...@elpauer.org: Hello, If you don't mind using CMake ( http://cmake.org ) instead of Scons, here is a

Re: SOC Project Idea: Winelib-aware scons

2009-03-21 Thread André Hentschel
King InuYasha schrieb: On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Chris Morgan chmor...@gmail.com mailto:chmor...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com mailto:shackl...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/3/21 Pau Garcia i Quiles pgqui...@elpauer.org

Re: [scons-dev] SOC Project Idea: Winelib-aware scons

2009-03-21 Thread Greg Noel
three years of inactivity. Over the last few months it looks like you've been trying to revitalize the project, but I'm not seeing a lot of traction. If I were a student researching this idea, I'd be leery about proposing a project for a tool that appeared moribund. That said, there's

SOC Project Idea: Winelib-aware scons

2009-03-20 Thread Scott Ritchie
For a while now I've been hoping someone would tackle a pet project of mine. It occurred to me that it would be a great summer of code project. Basically, I want a magic script that can convert a visual studio project file into a winelib-aware, scons-powered, linux-compatible build system.

Re: SOC Project Idea: Winelib-aware scons

2009-03-20 Thread Pau Garcia i Quiles
Hello, If you don't mind using CMake ( http://cmake.org ) instead of Scons, here is a starting point: http://dgwarp.hd.free.fr/vcproj2cmake.rb On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Scott Ritchie sc...@open-vote.org wrote: For a while now I've been hoping someone would tackle a pet project of

Re: SOC Project Idea: Winelib-aware scons

2009-03-20 Thread Ben Klein
2009/3/21 Pau Garcia i Quiles pgqui...@elpauer.org: Hello, If you don't mind using CMake ( http://cmake.org ) instead of Scons, here is a starting point: http://dgwarp.hd.free.fr/vcproj2cmake.rb On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Scott Ritchie sc...@open-vote.org wrote: For a while now

Re: SOC Project Idea: Winelib-aware scons

2009-03-20 Thread Chris Morgan
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/3/21 Pau Garcia i Quiles pgqui...@elpauer.org: Hello, If you don't mind using CMake ( http://cmake.org ) instead of Scons, here is a starting point: http://dgwarp.hd.free.fr/vcproj2cmake.rb On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at

Re: GSoC Idea: D3DXMesh

2009-03-18 Thread Andrew Fenn
Your email left me confused because you say implementing D3DXMesh is small however towards the end of your email say it is a large job. Surely having something small is good for SoC projects, no? On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Roderick Colenbrander thunderbir...@gmx.net wrote: Just an idea I

Re: GSoC Idea: D3DXMesh

2009-03-18 Thread Roderick Colenbrander
Your email left me confused because you say implementing D3DXMesh is small however towards the end of your email say it is a large job. Surely having something small is good for SoC projects, no? D3DX is huge and D3DXMesh is a small part of it but I meant that just implementing D3DXMesh

Re: GSoC Idea: D3DXMesh

2009-03-18 Thread Henri Verbeet
2009/3/18 Roderick Colenbrander thunderbir...@gmx.net: Your email left me confused because you say implementing D3DXMesh is small however towards the end of your email say it is a large job. Surely having something small is good for SoC projects, no? D3DX is huge and D3DXMesh is a small part

GSoC Idea: D3DXMesh

2009-03-17 Thread Andrew Fenn
Just an idea I came up with for Google's summer of code is perhaps implementing some of the D3DXMesh header files and functions so that we can get on with implementing functions such as D3DXCleanMesh which I believe Assassin's Creed needs. I have no intention of applying for GSoC however it's

Re: GSoC Idea: D3DXMesh

2009-03-17 Thread Roderick Colenbrander
Just an idea I came up with for Google's summer of code is perhaps implementing some of the D3DXMesh header files and functions so that we can get on with implementing functions such as D3DXCleanMesh which I believe Assassin's Creed needs. I have no intention of applying for GSoC however

An idea for the appdb

2009-02-11 Thread Luke Benstead
. Obviously this kind of functionality is not a job for Wine, but for the distro. Still, it got me thinking how this kind of functionality might be achieved. My idea is that the appdb should allow for people to associate a list of checksums with an application version. For example, WoW might have

Re: An idea for the appdb

2009-02-11 Thread Ben Klein
simply isn't reliable enough for this type of dependence. With any luck, that will change when the recently discussed redesign of test data submissions is set up, but it'd still take a long time for sensible data to become reasonably usable. My idea is that the appdb should allow for people

Re: An idea for the appdb

2009-02-11 Thread Luke Benstead
these lines recently. Unfortunately, AppDB simply isn't reliable enough for this type of dependence. With any luck, that will change when the recently discussed redesign of test data submissions is set up, but it'd still take a long time for sensible data to become reasonably usable. My idea

Re: An idea for the appdb

2009-02-11 Thread Ben Klein
2009/2/11 Luke Benstead kaz...@gmail.com: 2009/2/11 Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com: 2009/2/11 Luke Benstead kaz...@gmail.com: My idea is that the appdb should allow for people to associate a list of checksums with an application version. For example, WoW might have the checksum for the setup

Re: An idea for the appdb

2009-02-11 Thread Gert van den Berg
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Luke Benstead kaz...@gmail.com wrote: I can also see what you mean about spyware, but other apps retrieve stuff from the web if there is a connection (CDDB, and album covers are two examples). Wine transmitting every application I run to someone else would be

Re: An idea for the appdb

2009-02-11 Thread Tim Schwartz
23:57:48 +1100 From: Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com Subject: Re: An idea for the appdb To: Luke Benstead kaz...@gmail.com Cc: Wine Devel wine-devel@winehq.org Message-ID: d7e40be30902110457t3d84c396ibfd264aead12d...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2009/2/11

Re: An idea for the appdb

2009-02-11 Thread alex
Sorry .. forgot to reply all. On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:08:47 +0200, Gert van den Berg wine-de...@mohag.net wrote: On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Luke Benstead kaz...@gmail.com wrote: I can also see what you mean about spyware, but other apps retrieve stuff from the web if there is a connection

Re: An idea for the appdb

2009-02-11 Thread Austin English
This was discussed a couple months ago, nearly to death. It's a cool idea, sure, but a ton of work to do, and not really worth the effort. The data is quickly outdated with new wine versions. Some users may consider it spyware, developers would find it annoying, and overall, it would be a big mess

Re: An idea for the appdb

2009-02-11 Thread James Mckenzie
-Original Message- From: a...@centroidcafe.com Sent: Feb 11, 2009 10:59 AM To: wine-devel@winehq.org Subject: Re: An idea for the appdb Sorry .. forgot to reply all. Automatic submission of test data could be a very handy tool. Scenario: User A tries to run an application, it crashes

Re: An idea for the appdb

2009-02-11 Thread alex
, it seems like there is currently a movement to rework AppDB anyway, so why not consider this idea now, so it could be factored into those plans? -Alex

Re: An idea for the appdb

2009-02-11 Thread Matt 'Murph' Finnicum
. If that is the consensus, then I won't bother looking into this further. However, it seems like there is currently a movement to rework AppDB anyway, so why not consider this idea now, so it could be factored into those plans? -Alex Why not just write a external utility (perhaps with a bit of support

Re: An idea for the appdb

2009-02-11 Thread Luke Benstead
is not worth attempting at this point. If that is the consensus, then I won't bother looking into this further. However, it seems like there is currently a movement to rework AppDB anyway, so why not consider this idea now, so it could be factored into those plans? -Alex Why not just

Re: An idea for the appdb

2009-02-11 Thread John Klehm
Please correct me if I'm wrong but before we go about collecting all this information wouldn't it be better to have some compatibility framework in Wine that could actually make use of it? Otherwise we're collecting a lot of information that is of little immediate use. In other words we'd have

Re: An idea for the appdb

2009-02-11 Thread Ben Klein
2009/2/12 Gert van den Berg wine-de...@mohag.net: On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Luke Benstead kaz...@gmail.com wrote: I can also see what you mean about spyware, but other apps retrieve stuff from the web if there is a connection (CDDB, and album covers are two examples). Wine

Re: An idea for the appdb

2009-02-11 Thread Sparr
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/2/12 Gert van den Berg wine-de...@mohag.net: It should rather be opt-in. Such as Wine has detected that it is the first time you run this application, do you want to check AppDb for more information (Yes/No/Ask

Re: An idea for the appdb

2009-02-11 Thread Ben Klein
2009/2/12 Sparr spa...@gmail.com: On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Ben Klein shackl...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/2/12 Gert van den Berg wine-de...@mohag.net: It should rather be opt-in. Such as Wine has detected that it is the first time you run this application, do you want to check AppDb for

Re: Better user feedback and better user experience (idea)

2008-12-18 Thread Steve Brown
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Austin English wrote: In a few years when Wine is more developed and has most the API implemented, this may be useful, but there's still a lot to do, and we don't need more reports to tell us this. Keep in mind that the Windows API is a moving target. In a few years, the

Re: Better user feedback and better user experience (idea)

2008-12-18 Thread Austin English
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 8:07 AM, Steve Brown sbro...@umbc.edu wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Austin English wrote: In a few years when Wine is more developed and has most the API implemented, this may be useful, but there's still a lot to do, and we don't need more reports to tell us this.

Re: Better user feedback and better user experience (idea)

2008-12-18 Thread Sander Devrieze
. It sounds like a great idea, but Wine is still very much a developer's tool. It's not user-friendly, and it won't be for a very long time, if ever. Most end-users primarily don't report bugs because they don't want to spend time on this. winewatson sounds like a developer's debugging tool

Re: Better user feedback and better user experience (idea)

2008-12-18 Thread Scott Ritchie
Austin English wrote: On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 8:07 AM, Steve Brown sbro...@umbc.edu wrote: On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Austin English wrote: In a few years when Wine is more developed and has most the API implemented, this may be useful, but there's still a lot to do, and we don't need more reports

Re: Better user feedback and better user experience (idea)

2008-12-17 Thread Sander Devrieze
2008/12/17 Scott Ritchie sc...@open-vote.org: snip If it's that users blame the distro when it's a Wine problem, then we can present them with some sort of information before installing (or perhaps running) Wine. After that we should get out of the way and let them use Wine as normal. Wine

Re: Better user feedback and better user experience (idea)

2008-12-17 Thread Austin English
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Sander Devrieze s.devri...@linux.be wrote: 2008/12/17 Scott Ritchie sc...@open-vote.org: snip If it's that users blame the distro when it's a Wine problem, then we can present them with some sort of information before installing (or perhaps running) Wine.

Re: Better user feedback and better user experience (idea)

2008-12-17 Thread Sander Devrieze
2008/12/17 Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com: snip Writing an elaborate system to tell us about known problems isn't particularly helpful; It shouldn't be an elaborate system: it can be as easy as asking the user to click on a button to send a list of API calls, used DLLs, a hash of

Re: Better user feedback and better user experience (idea)

2008-12-17 Thread Reece Dunn
2008/12/17 Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com: On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Sander Devrieze s.devri...@linux.be wrote: 2008/12/17 Scott Ritchie sc...@open-vote.org: snip If it's that users blame the distro when it's a Wine problem, then we can present them with some sort of

Better user feedback and better user experience (idea)

2008-12-16 Thread Sander Devrieze
Hi, One of the reasons why Linux distributions do not want to include Wine by default is because compatibility issues may result a bad impression of the quality of the OS. Users think Linux sucks because their Windows application does not run (as good) under Wine as it does under Windows.

Re: Better user feedback and better user experience (idea)

2008-12-16 Thread Zachary Goldberg
2008/12/16 Sander Devrieze s.devri...@linux.be: Hi, One of the reasons why Linux distributions do not want to include Wine by default is because compatibility issues may result a bad impression of the quality of the OS. Users think Linux sucks because their Windows application does not run

Re: Better user feedback and better user experience (idea)

2008-12-16 Thread Scott Ritchie
Sander Devrieze wrote: Hi, One of the reasons why Linux distributions do not want to include Wine by default is because compatibility issues may result a bad impression of the quality of the OS. Users think Linux sucks because their Windows application does not run (as good) under Wine as

  1   2   3   4   >