Hi!
I still need help on this case, any advice is appreciated.
2009/4/25 Igor Tarasov tarasov.i...@gmail.com:
Hi!
I've found few visual glitches in comctl32/toolbar, and now try to
write this all down as conformance tests, but I have some problems. I
see that there is bug, when I test it
Igor Tarasov wrote:
Hi!
I've found few visual glitches in comctl32/toolbar, and now try to
write this all down as conformance tests, but I have some problems. I
see that there is bug, when I test it with control spy. But when I
repeat it in testcase, it won't work. Here is how you can
Hi Igor
I've found few visual glitches in comctl32/toolbar, and now try to
write this all down as conformance tests,
Thanks for your work on comctl32
TB_SETBITMAPSIZE 20,20
TB_SETBUTTONSIZE 30,30
TB_SETBITMAPSIZE 10,10
Now, if you do TB_SETBUTTONSIZE, you'll see the difference. builtin
2009/4/25 Detlef Riekenberg wine@web.de:
Now, if you do TB_SETBUTTONSIZE, you'll see the difference. builtin
comctl will return 17,16. Native - 30,16.
Did you mean TB_GETBUTTONSIZE?
Yes, of course. That was a typo.
Native comctl32 in Wine or native on Windows?
Both. They both behave the
Hi!
I've found few visual glitches in comctl32/toolbar, and now try to
write this all down as conformance tests, but I have some problems. I
see that there is bug, when I test it with control spy. But when I
repeat it in testcase, it won't work. Here is how you can reproduce
it:
TB_SETBITMAPSIZE