Am Montag 09 August 2010, 21:41:18 schrieb Oldřich Jedlička:
ok(hr==DD_OK || broken(hr != DD_OK SUCCEEDED(hr)),
text...)
I think as long as no native app is found that depends on DD_OK it's ok just
use ok(SUCCEEDED(hr)) for the sake of readability.
2010/8/8 Oldřich Jedlička oldium@seznam.cz:
Hi W,
On Sunday 08 August 2010 11:21:35 wy...@volny.cz wrote:
Hi,
i
just noticed some new and subtle failure in ddraw:dsurface
tests. I don't
know how closely you watch and study tests
results, so i thought it might
be a good idea bring it
2010/8/9 Roderick Colenbrander thunderbir...@gmail.com:
2010/8/8 Oldřich Jedlička oldium@seznam.cz:
Hi W,
On Sunday 08 August 2010 11:21:35 wy...@volny.cz wrote:
Hi,
i
just noticed some new and subtle failure in ddraw:dsurface
tests. I don't
know how closely you watch and study tests
Hi,
Do you mean this problem?
ddraw:dsurface start ...
Nope and nothing about 64bit (there was no change). I was initially
talking about changed result from last Friday. To be precise this
new information showed up under WinXP 32bit on nvidia 8600GT:
dsurface.c:3511: Test failed:
Hi W,
On Monday 09 August 2010 12:31:45 wy...@volny.cz wrote:
Hi,
Do you mean this problem?
ddraw:dsurface start ...
Nope and nothing
about 64bit (there was no change). I was initially
talking about changed
result from last Friday. To be precise this
new information showed up
under
Hi,
i just noticed some new and subtle failure in ddraw:dsurface
tests. I don't know how closely you watch and study tests
results, so i thought it might be a good idea bring it the
the light. Sorry if not ;-)
Compared WinXP 277040d92454 vs 8b2a403a7dc3 (latest vs last
Friday).
Interestingly
Hi W,
On Sunday 08 August 2010 11:21:35 wy...@volny.cz wrote:
Hi,
i
just noticed some new and subtle failure in ddraw:dsurface
tests. I don't
know how closely you watch and study tests
results, so i thought it might
be a good idea bring it the
the light. Sorry if not ;-)
Compared
WinXP
