Vijay Kiran Kamuju [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In your Last suggestion if i initialize the length variable in the
tests, the native simply gives garbage, thats inorder to make the test
pass.
I too dont know much about how use the wininet apis, i just wrote a
simple test prog to get test
About uninitalizing the length variable, if the tests bomb in windows,
dont ask me.
well i will put them in anew patch once this gets accepted. i have
still some more tests and implementation to go.
This is just the beggining.
Thanks,
Vijay
PS:
-
Why this always happens to me :( .
On
Vijay Kiran Kamuju [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as previous implementation had some bugs use this version
+case INTERNET_OPTION_VERSION:
{
-if (*lpdwBufferLength sizeof(HTTP_VERSION_INFO))
-INTERNET_SetLastError(ERROR_INSUFFICIENT_BUFFER);
+
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 12:07:57AM +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Vijay Kiran Kamuju [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ char useragent[] = {'W','i','n','i','n','e','t',' ','T','e','s','t',0 };
char useragent[] = Wininet Test;
works just fine.
Maybe it works, but not fine ;)
static const
Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
+case INTERNET_OPTION_ASYNC:
+case INTERNET_OPTION_ASYNC_ID:
+case INTERNET_OPTION_ASYNC_PRIORITY:
+case INTERNET_OPTION_CALLBACK_FILTER:
+case INTERNET_OPTION_CODEPAGE:
+case INTERNET_OPTION_CONNECT_BACKOFF:
+
Hi,
I have made changes, sending them soon.
Dimitry:
In your first suggestion, i think using a new variable is not a good
idea. It has been done like that for all options and previously for
the same options. next time i will think of something valid.
In your third suggestion, you asked me not to
On 11/9/05, Vijay Kiran Kamuju [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In your third suggestion, you asked me not to set to 0, if set to
0xdeadbeef, that means i have to check for 0xdeadbeef. :(. when does
API set its error to 0, what might be the cases generally.
You have to set the last error to a crazy
I tried in test program initilizing the length varaible like
DWORD len=0;
Then its giving me garbage, didnt try other possibilities.
Thanks,
Vijay
On 11/9/05, James Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/9/05, Vijay Kiran Kamuju [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In your third suggestion, you asked me
Vijay Kiran Kamuju [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have made changes, sending them soon.
Dimitry:
In your first suggestion, i think using a new variable is not a good
idea. It has been done like that for all options and previously for
the same options. next time i will think of something valid.
On 11/9/05, Dmitry Timoshkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vijay Kiran Kamuju [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have made changes, sending them soon.
Dimitry:
In your first suggestion, i think using a new variable is not a good
idea. It has been done like that for all options and previously for
10 matches
Mail list logo
