Re: Bug #6439: requesting explanation of GDI_CheckNotLock in order to fix

2006-10-19 Thread Fabian Cenedese
At 19:09 18.10.2006 -0600, you wrote: Alex Villací­s Lasso wrote: I would like to draw attention to bug #6439 Why that bug in particular? Can we pick any other? You seems to really like to copy list of all of your bugs. Hell that's turn this list into another Bugzilla! You know, I wanted to look

Re: Bug #6439: requesting explanation of GDI_CheckNotLock in order to fix

2006-10-19 Thread Alex Villací­s Lasso
Vitaliy Margolen escribió: Alex Villací­s Lasso wrote: I would like to draw attention to bug #6439 Why that bug in particular? Can we pick any other? Yes, you can:

Re: Bug #6439: requesting explanation of GDI_CheckNotLock in order to fix

2006-10-19 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Alex Villací­s Lasso [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So, when metafiles are involved, this sequence of calls triggers the debug assertion in CreateCompatibleDC(). Since I don't really see the point of having the assertion in CreateCompatibleDC(), I was planning to send a patch to simply remove the

Re: Bug #6439: requesting explanation of GDI_CheckNotLock in order to fix

2006-10-18 Thread Vitaliy Margolen
Alex Villací­s Lasso wrote: I would like to draw attention to bug #6439 Why that bug in particular? Can we pick any other? You seems to really like to copy list of all of your bugs. Hell that's turn this list into another Bugzilla! You know, I wanted to look at this bug when I get home. And now