Re: privileged instruction in 32-bit code

2005-11-11 Thread Marcus Meissner
(gdb) disassemble bar Dump of assembler code for function bar: 0x080495a0 bar+0: movaps %xmm0,(%ecx) 0x080495a3 bar+3: shufps $0xa,%xmm3,%xmm2 0x080495a7 bar+7: add$0x90,%eax 0x080495ac bar+12:decl 0x4c(%esp) 0x080495b0 bar+16:movaps %xmm1,0x10(%ecx) 0x080495b4

Re: privileged instruction in 32-bit code

2005-11-11 Thread Andreas Mohr
Hi, On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 10:36:24AM +0100, Marcus Meissner wrote: (gdb) disassemble bar Dump of assembler code for function bar: 0x080495a0 bar+0: movaps %xmm0,(%ecx) 0x080495a3 bar+3: shufps $0xa,%xmm3,%xmm2 0x080495a7 bar+7: add$0x90,%eax 0x080495ac bar+12:

Re: privileged instruction in 32-bit code

2005-11-11 Thread Ivan Leo Puoti
Hi, seems another Copy Protected Game. can you try Ivan Leo Puoti patches (related to ntoskrnl/safedisc) ? Raphael Unless the game is protected by safedisc they won't help much. Chances are some anti debugger checks are failing, so the game intentionally screws itself up. Ivan.

Re: privileged instruction in 32-bit code

2005-11-11 Thread Tyler Nielsen
Andreas Mohr wrote: Hi, On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 10:36:24AM +0100, Marcus Meissner wrote: (gdb) disassemble bar Dump of assembler code for function bar: 0x080495a0 bar+0: movaps %xmm0,(%ecx) 0x080495a3 bar+3: shufps $0xa,%xmm3,%xmm2 0x080495a7 bar+7: add$0x90,%eax 0x080495ac

Re: privileged instruction in 32-bit code

2005-11-11 Thread Tyler Nielsen
Ivan Leo Puoti wrote: Hi, seems another Copy Protected Game. can you try Ivan Leo Puoti patches (related to ntoskrnl/safedisc) ? Raphael Unless the game is protected by safedisc they won't help much. Chances are some anti debugger checks are failing, so the game intentionally screws

Re: privileged instruction in 32-bit code

2005-11-11 Thread Peter Beutner
Tyler Nielsen schrieb: Ivan Leo Puoti wrote: Yeah, the safedisc patch didn't seem to help the issue at all. I really hope this isn't debugger checks failing, but I still wonder why a seemingly valid command (movaps) is returning a privileged instruction exception. google says: movaps will

Re: privileged instruction in 32-bit code

2005-11-11 Thread Tyler Nielsen
Peter Beutner wrote: Tyler Nielsen schrieb: Ivan Leo Puoti wrote: Yeah, the safedisc patch didn't seem to help the issue at all. I really hope this isn't debugger checks failing, but I still wonder why a seemingly valid command (movaps) is returning a privileged instruction exception.

Re: privileged instruction in 32-bit code

2005-11-11 Thread Uwe Bonnes
Peter == Peter Beutner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Peter Tyler Nielsen schrieb: Ivan Leo Puoti wrote: Yeah, the safedisc patch didn't seem to help the issue at all. I really hope this isn't debugger checks failing, but I still wonder why a seemingly valid command (movaps) is

Re: privileged instruction in 32-bit code

2005-11-10 Thread Raphael
on pid 0x8 Unhandled exception: privileged instruction in 32-bit code (0x00872230). In 32 bit mode. fixme:dbghelp:sffip_cb NIY on 'D:\test\eq2\output\User_Optimized\Client\EverQuest2.pdb' Register dump: CS:0073 SS:007b DS:007b ES:007b FS:003b GS:0033 EIP:00872230 ESP:7fbfee40 EBP:7fbfef64

Re: privileged instruction in 32-bit code

2005-11-10 Thread Tyler Nielsen
up I get: WineDbg starting on pid 0x8 Unhandled exception: privileged instruction in 32-bit code (0x00872230). In 32 bit mode. fixme:dbghelp:sffip_cb NIY on 'D:\test\eq2\output\User_Optimized\Client\EverQuest2.pdb' Register dump: CS:0073 SS:007b DS:007b ES:007b FS:003b GS:0033 EIP:00872230 ESP

privileged instruction in 32-bit code

2005-11-09 Thread Tyler Nielsen
in 32-bit code (0x00872230). In 32 bit mode. fixme:dbghelp:sffip_cb NIY on 'D:\test\eq2\output\User_Optimized\Client\EverQuest2.pdb' Register dump: CS:0073 SS:007b DS:007b ES:007b FS:003b GS:0033 EIP:00872230 ESP:7fbfee40 EBP:7fbfef64 EFLAGS:00210202( - 00 - -RI1) EAX:75065bec EBX:00f77bc0 ECX