Re: too much dynamic loading?

2010-05-23 Thread James McKenzie
Marcus Meissner wrote: On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 01:03:09PM -0400, Steven Edwards wrote: On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Marcus Meissner mar...@jet.franken.de wrote: As libjpeg and libpng bumped their major versions in the last months I had to adjust some of my library requires in my

Re: too much dynamic loading?

2010-05-23 Thread Austin English
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 4:13 PM, James McKenzie jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net wrote: Marcus Meissner wrote: On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 01:03:09PM -0400, Steven Edwards wrote: On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Marcus Meissner mar...@jet.franken.de wrote: As libjpeg and libpng bumped their major

Re: too much dynamic loading?

2010-05-23 Thread James McKenzie
ryan woodsmall wrote: I'm not convinced direct linking will work better on Mac OS X, unless you ship libpng and libjpeg with Wine. And libgnutls (plus prereqs libgpg-error libgcrypt). And libgphoto2, libexif, libtiff, libgsm, libjbig... - there's a laundry list of libraries that are

Re: too much dynamic loading?

2010-05-23 Thread James McKenzie
Austin English wrote: On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 4:13 PM, James McKenzie jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net wrote: Marcus Meissner wrote: On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 01:03:09PM -0400, Steven Edwards wrote: On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Marcus Meissner mar...@jet.franken.de wrote:

Re: too much dynamic loading?

2010-05-23 Thread Steven Edwards
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 5:20 PM, James McKenzie jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net wrote: I'm referring to the 'little' things, like openssl.  MacOSXs version is not the same as Linux.  Also, the level of library support varies greatly between versions of MacOSX. See my reply to Ryan for more on

Re: too much dynamic loading?

2010-05-22 Thread Francois Gouget
On Fri, 21 May 2010, Steven Edwards wrote: On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Marcus Meissner mar...@jet.franken.dewrote: No static linking either, its the nightmare of security maintainers ;) Good point. Direct Linking then. I am just in favor of changing it to something other than the

Re: too much dynamic loading?

2010-05-22 Thread ryan woodsmall
I'm not convinced direct linking will work better on Mac OS X, unless you ship libpng and libjpeg with Wine. And libgnutls (plus prereqs libgpg-error libgcrypt). And libgphoto2, libexif, libtiff, libgsm, libjbig... - there's a laundry list of libraries that are required for a full-featured

too much dynamic loading?

2010-05-21 Thread Marcus Meissner
Hi, As libjpeg and libpng bumped their major versions in the last months I had to adjust some of my library requires in my wine.spec file. This caused me thinking if it is really necessary to dynamically load nearly every library. Can we make some of those direct linking? libjpeg and libpng and

Re: too much dynamic loading?

2010-05-21 Thread Steven Edwards
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Marcus Meissner mar...@jet.franken.de wrote: As libjpeg and libpng bumped their major versions in the last months I had to adjust some of my library requires in my wine.spec file. This caused me thinking if it is really necessary to dynamically load nearly

Re: too much dynamic loading?

2010-05-21 Thread Marcus Meissner
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 01:03:09PM -0400, Steven Edwards wrote: On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Marcus Meissner mar...@jet.franken.de wrote: As libjpeg and libpng bumped their major versions in the last months I had to adjust some of my library requires in my wine.spec file. This

Re: too much dynamic loading?

2010-05-21 Thread Steven Edwards
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Marcus Meissner mar...@jet.franken.dewrote: No static linking either, its the nightmare of security maintainers ;) Good point. Direct Linking then. I am just in favor of changing it to something other than the status quo because all of this dynamic loading