Re: wintrust: Only return ERROR_SUCCESS in WinVerifyTrust

2006-08-07 Thread Paul Vriens
On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 11:43 +0200, Molle Bestefich wrote: Dan Kegel wrote: Not to be harsh, but: Hehe ;-). I know, I was just poking, hoping to get an explanation for why James' particular app might be more beneficial than Process Explorer. (yes, I like Process Explorer, I use it for

Re: wintrust: Only return ERROR_SUCCESS in WinVerifyTrust

2006-08-06 Thread Molle Bestefich
Dan Kegel wrote: Not to be harsh, but: Hehe ;-). I know, I was just poking, hoping to get an explanation for why James' particular app might be more beneficial than Process Explorer. (yes, I like Process Explorer, I use it for debugging from time to time.) The optimal thing of course would

Re: wintrust: Only return ERROR_SUCCESS in WinVerifyTrust

2006-08-05 Thread Molle Bestefich
James Hawkins wrote: I'd rather have 5 more apps installing, than one app working (and it's Process Explorer of all things). Who are you to say which apps are important and which aren't?... Andreas Mohr wrote: Indeed, but I'm not sure it's a good idea to kill all comment annotations in the

Re: wintrust: Only return ERROR_SUCCESS in WinVerifyTrust

2006-08-05 Thread Dan Kegel
On 8/5/06, Molle Bestefich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: James Hawkins wrote: I'd rather have 5 more apps installing, than one app working (and it's Process Explorer of all things). Who are you to say which apps are important and which aren't?... Not to be harsh, but:

Re: wintrust: Only return ERROR_SUCCESS in WinVerifyTrust

2006-08-02 Thread Andreas Mohr
Hi, On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 01:21:57PM -0700, James Hawkins wrote: My reasoning for reverting the change is that I'd rather have 5 more apps installing, than one app working (and it's Process Explorer of all things). Indeed, but I'm not sure it's a good idea to kill all comment annotations in