Owen Rudge wrote:
I was stopped at security for carrying 'a wine bottle' through
security. Upon a brief inspection it was revealed that my
super-awesome crossover t-shirts had tripped the machine due to their
lusciously exquisite compressed shape. Whoops.
I'll be sure to put mine in
Arthur Taylor wrote:
Also, in the patch, configure checks for pulseaudio = 0.9.7. I have
since noticed that it uses parts of the api from 0.9.11 and compilation
will fail against previous versions.
Thanks
As an aside, 0.9.11 is newer than most users have (Ubuntu 8.04 has
0.9.10, for
2008/9/29 Scott Ritchie [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Arthur Taylor wrote:
Also, in the patch, configure checks for pulseaudio = 0.9.7. I have
since noticed that it uses parts of the api from 0.9.11 and compilation
will fail against previous versions.
Thanks
As an aside, 0.9.11 is newer than most
Hi.
I'm wondering about doing a quick-n-dirty Win32s re-implementation for
ReactOS, following an email [last-year-this-year] discussion on the ReactOS
dev list. Based on Wine, of course, and operating as Windows-on-Windows in
the Microsoft OS of the same name.
Does anyone know where to get
I completely forgot to write to the broader list to let you know
that we successfully added 1 more machine - Stefans - to the list of computers
that run make test successfully. (We also got James Hawkins Windows box
down to 1 failure, and eliminated an enormous number of other test failures).
I
Does anyone know where to get copies of the Win32s documentation, such as
it
is?
I don't know where to find a copy as such (perhaps tucked away in the old
Microsoft FTP server, or linked to from a KB article?), but I do have a
couple of versions here, shipped with various old compilers.
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Vitaliy Margolen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeremy White wrote:
We discussed bugzilla versions at Wineconf, re:
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12728
There were several points of consensus. First, it would be helpful
if we could reduce the number of
Ignore this; patchwatcher probably got confused by the word
difference at the beginning of a line. This is a known and
very lame bug...
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Patchwatcher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi! This is the experimental automated wine patchwatcher thingy.
The latest git
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 7:32 PM, Dan Kegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.soft32.com/download/63-129953-1/Adobe_Contribute_4_Win.exe
fails with
err:module:import_dll Library MSVCP71.dll (which is needed by
LC:\\Program Files\\Adobe\\Contribute 4\\CoreTypes.dll) not found
Wine has a nice
Hi Dylan,
@@ -402,6 +401,10 @@ static void test_EM_SCROLLCARET(void)
ff\n
gg\n
hh\n;
+ HWND hwndRichEdit = CreateWindow(RICHEDIT_CLASS, NULL,
+
ES_MULTILINE|WS_POPUP|WS_HSCROLL|WS_VSCROLL|WS_VISIBLE,
+ 0, 0, 200, 80, NULL, NULL,
What's the best way for an application to detect that it's running under Wine?
As part of the installation process, under Windows our program does a
full-disk search of all local hard drives, but ignoring network drives
and removable media. Under Wine, this doesn't work too well, as
there's not
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Mark Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the best way for an application to detect that it's running under Wine?
As part of the installation process, under Windows our program does a
full-disk search of all local hard drives, but ignoring network drives
and
Rob Shearman robertshearman at gmail.com writes:
Hi Rob, i think i got the test ready now, i'll send it when the defenitions are
in place in ctxtcall.idl. Now still strugling how to fix the bug.
I fixed up the patch below, also by looking how things are done in similar
places in wine-code.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 6:52 AM, Austin English [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Mark Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the best way for an application to detect that it's running under
Wine?
As part of the installation process, under Windows our program does a
What's the best way for an application to detect that it's running under Wine?
Some people have given suggestions, but please note that we discourage
doing this. It's better to fix Wine than to work around its bugs, and
working around bugs removes incentive to fix them. So please, log a
bug
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Jeff Zaroyko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Easier still would be checking for wine_get_version in ntdll...
#include windows.h
#include stdio.h
int main(void)
{
static const char * (CDECL *pwine_get_version)(void);
HMODULE hntdll = GetModuleHandle(ntdll.dll);
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Juan Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the best way for an application to detect that it's running under
Wine?
Some people have given suggestions, but please note that we discourage
doing this. It's better to fix Wine than to work around its bugs, and
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 14:41, Juan Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the best way for an application to detect that it's running under
Wine?
Some people have given suggestions, but please note that we discourage
doing this. It's better to fix Wine than to work around its bugs, and
Did you read the second paragraph of my original email? I'm not
working around a bug in Wine, unless it's a bug that a user can map
/ to C: and call it a fixed disk.
Yes, I read it. And scanning / shouldn't be a problem, unless
you've also mapped network drives there. That seems to be the
I'de like to nominate this bit of code (if approved as an 'acceptable
practice') for the wiki. It seems Wine-devel gets this question at
least once a month. Thoughts?
Not acceptable practice. See e.g. the old faq entry:
http://www.winehq.org/site/docs/wine-faq/index#HOW-CAN-I-DETECT-WINE
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Mark Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 14:41, Juan Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the best way for an application to detect that it's running under
Wine?
Some people have given suggestions, but please note that we discourage
doing
Yes, that's the root of the problem. I can't prevent the end-user
from mounting network drives -- in fact, in the expected installation
environment, the average user will have several very large network
drives mounted.
I believe you.
Under Windows, installation takes about five minutes,
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 14:55, Juan Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you read the second paragraph of my original email? I'm not
working around a bug in Wine, unless it's a bug that a user can map
/ to C: and call it a fixed disk.
Yes, I read it. And scanning / shouldn't be a problem,
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 15:15, Guillaume VanderEst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Based on the current information, wouldn't it be smartest to ask the users
which drive(s) they would like included in the search, or is it actually
required that all disks be scanned?
The average non-Wine user of this
Thanks.
I'll get onto it right away.
Wesley Parish
Quoting Owen Rudge [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Does anyone know where to get copies of the Win32s documentation, such
as
it
is?
I don't know where to find a copy as such (perhaps tucked away in the
old
Microsoft FTP server, or linked to
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 5:58 PM, Juan Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not acceptable practice. See e.g. the old faq entry:
http://www.winehq.org/site/docs/wine-faq/index#HOW-CAN-I-DETECT-WINE
I don't understand why this should still be the case. We have a stable
Wine now and Alexadre exported
26 matches
Mail list logo
