On Monday October 8 2007 23:01, TheBlunderbuss wrote:
L. Rahyen wrote:
Please test with your uniprocessor and get back to us on it. Not all of us
can have the top-of-the-line system. To all: stay away from Celerons! 128KB
L2 isn't enough!
Sorry for a big delay in reply. In practice
L. Rahyen wrote:
Now 2.6.23 is stable so everyone can easily try and test it. All major
distribution should provide precompiled 2.6.23 kernels in near future.
Thanks for your test!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
King InuYasha schreef:
I would like to suggest that eventually Wine would support PulseAudio as
a sound output natively. I am already aware of Wine supporting ESD,
which PulseAudio can use, but supporting PulseAudio natively I think
would be much
On Thursday 11 October 2007 04:02:22 Jan Zerebecki wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 06:22:19PM -0500, King InuYasha wrote:
That way, there isn't a conflict between audio
streams to send to audio output.
Any mixing resolves this conflict, the only thing that does not
support this is bare oss.
I
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 11:44:03AM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On Thursday 11 October 2007 04:02:22 Jan Zerebecki wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 06:22:19PM -0500, King InuYasha wrote:
That way, there isn't a conflict between audio
streams to send to audio output.
Any mixing resolves
Hello Dave,
Dave Phillips schreef:
I'm not a Wine devel, but I am closely allied with the Linux audio
community (yes, there is such a thing) and I use Wine frequently for
running Windows ASIO-based music and sound apps. I use Robert Reif's
wineasio driver, which basically does what Maarten
While PulseAudio can work through ALSA, it makes you lose the finer grains
of control over audio when it is sent through ALSA to PulseAudio. It is also
redundant in most cases, since PulseAudio generally will be connected to
localhost to ALSA on localhost, so it is not very smart to rely on
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 06:22:19PM -0500, King InuYasha wrote:
While PulseAudio can work through ALSA, it makes you lose the finer grains
of control over audio when it is sent through ALSA to PulseAudio.
Then it seems that is a limitation of the alsa plugin pulseaudio
provides. Fixing that
I agree that wineoss needs to remain.
I don't remember anymore if there was still some reason for
keeping wineesd.
Both jack and pulseaudio can provide alsa support for
applications. So in principle there is no reason for direct
support in wine for either of them.
We might be able to get trough
On 10/7/07, Michael Stefaniuc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
King InuYasha wrote:
I would like to suggest that eventually Wine would support PulseAudio as
a sound output natively. I am already aware of Wine supporting ESD,
which PulseAudio can use, but supporting PulseAudio natively I
Damjan Jovanovic schreef:
Pulseaudio isn't yet another sound server, it's a full-blown
replacement for all other sound servers. It mixes sound better than
alsa's dmix, it's a drop-in replacement for ESD, and it works even for
OSS applications using oss2pulse. Some of its interesting features
On Monday October 8 2007 10:48, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Damjan Jovanovic schreef:
Pulseaudio isn't yet another sound server, it's a full-blown
replacement for all other sound servers. It mixes sound better than
alsa's dmix, it's a drop-in replacement for ESD, and it works even for
OSS
On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 23:07 +0200, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
Hello!
King InuYasha wrote:
I would like to suggest that eventually Wine would support PulseAudio as
a sound output natively. I am already aware of Wine supporting ESD,
which PulseAudio can use, but supporting PulseAudio
Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Damjan Jovanovic schreef:
Pulseaudio isn't yet another sound server, it's a full-blown
replacement for all other sound servers. It mixes sound better than
alsa's dmix, it's a drop-in replacement for ESD, and it works even for
OSS applications using oss2pulse. Some of
On Monday 08 October 2007 14:43:30 Dave Phillips wrote:
Well, first I'd suggest simply supporting ALSA as thoroughly as
necessary or possible. It is the default kernel sound system, Wine
may as well incorporate it as well as it can. Supporting the
deprecated OSS API might be a good idea too,
On 10/8/07, King InuYasha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wine must not let go of the OSS support since OSS was recently made GPL'd
and CDDL'd for use in FOSS kernels by its maker (4Front) and OSS is the
POSIX audio system of choice for nearly every time except Linux. Linux does
not use OSS anymore
L. Rahyen wrote:
You probably should try new linux kernel. There is
high chances that it will
fix these problems for you. Personally I use 2.6.23-rc8. You find that with
new kernel performance is very good even under heavy load
...But when I have purchased 3 GHz quad-core system with
Wine must not let go of the OSS support since OSS was recently made GPL'd
and CDDL'd for use in FOSS kernels by its maker (4Front) and OSS is the
POSIX audio system of choice for nearly every time except Linux. Linux does
not use OSS anymore and uses ALSA. Since Linux is the primary target of
On Monday October 8 2007 23:01, TheBlunderbuss wrote:
L. Rahyen wrote:
I didn't tested yet my one-core system with new 2.6.23 kernel so
I'm not sure how well it will behave with uniprocessor system but I guess
it should work as expected.
Please test with your uniprocessor and get
I would like to suggest that eventually Wine would support PulseAudio as a
sound output natively. I am already aware of Wine supporting ESD, which
PulseAudio can use, but supporting PulseAudio natively I think would be much
better.
I would like to suggest that eventually Wine would support PulseAudio as a
sound output natively. I am already aware of Wine supporting ESD, which
PulseAudio can use, but supporting PulseAudio natively I think would be
much
better.
Audio in wine is still a problematic area. The situation
Hello!
King InuYasha wrote:
I would like to suggest that eventually Wine would support PulseAudio as
a sound output natively. I am already aware of Wine supporting ESD,
which PulseAudio can use, but supporting PulseAudio natively I think
would be much better.
There are already a couple too
22 matches
Mail list logo
