RE: [WinPcap-users] setfilter

2004-11-13 Thread Fulvio Risso
Hi. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: giovedi 11 novembre 2004 21.18 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [WinPcap-users] setfilter Hello... Can I set a new filter on an ongoing capture without missing a packet? Discription: I set a 'port

Re: [WinPcap-users] Comparing packet lengths and data transfer

2004-11-13 Thread {Pedro Lucas-Suporte Netcount}
1) FCS (CRC) has 4 bytes, it is included in the Ethernet protocol, which means it is actually going over the wire, but the applications won't see it. Winpcap included. This explains the 4 bytes diff. 2) The 4764 is padding, again, over the wire, the minimum frame size for Ethernet is 60+4 Bytes,

Re: [WinPcap-users] setfilter

2004-11-13 Thread Guy Harris
Fulvio Risso wrote: This beaviour is needed, otherwise you may receive packets satifying the old filter after setting the new one. Absolutely. The same is done in the BPF code in BSD. It's not done in the Linux socket filter code - but people complained about that, because they set a filter