RE: [WinPcap-users] setfilter

2004-11-22 Thread Loris Degioanni
Hi, Hi. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: giovedi 11 novembre 2004 21.18 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [WinPcap-users] setfilter Hello... Can I set a new filter on an ongoing capture without missing a packet?

RE: [WinPcap-users] setfilter

2004-11-13 Thread Fulvio Risso
Hi. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: giovedi 11 novembre 2004 21.18 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [WinPcap-users] setfilter Hello... Can I set a new filter on an ongoing capture without missing a packet? Discription: I set a 'port

Re: [WinPcap-users] setfilter

2004-11-13 Thread Guy Harris
Fulvio Risso wrote: This beaviour is needed, otherwise you may receive packets satifying the old filter after setting the new one. Absolutely. The same is done in the BPF code in BSD. It's not done in the Linux socket filter code - but people complained about that, because they set a filter