It would be amazing if one time our government could get spectrum policy
right. Up until now they have not got it right even once regarding
access to spectrum in my opinion. Unlicensed is closer to right than
licensed because it at least allows other entrants into the space other
than just the
I favor substantial use rules and also agree in rejecting squatters rights.
A method of issuing licenses I like is the following:
1. licenses are broken up into regional and local.
2. the government sets the price in advance
3. competing parties submit proposals
4. the proposals are evaluated on
I do get it, but at a different view point. I'll agree that the USF should
still be available, but let's widen the tax base and lower the percentage.
This also is a good time to look again at structural separation of the
Bell's
from the CO and form a regulated utility.
It is time that the FCC
Dreaming... hope you have a Plan B, Ethan Hunt.
Frank Muto wrote:
I do get it, but at a different view point. I'll agree that the USF
should
still be available, but let's widen the tax base and lower the
percentage.
This also is a good time to look again at structural separation of the
Hi Matt,
You are only limited to 1.5 Mbps service due to the fact that it is almost
impossible to achieve anything about a 10 dB SNR
In 900 Mhz -- say you had a 25+ dB SNR (e.g., how life works in licensed
bands) -- you could deliver 10-15 Mb on a 5 MHz channel
-Charles
