Hi,
Sorry dude, since it's not yet picked up and we want no 'big' changes now
I vote against it. The reason why it was not picked up? I don't know, but
I would have to rework the code considerable before committing it, as I
would want to get rid of the 10 level deep conditionals, the use of
Hi again,
no problem. I have already started to move a good amount of the
literals into the h-file and I will try to move all I can into
value_string arrays.
But this won't be possible for everything, as MIDI itself has
some specialities already within the coding and RTP-MIDI takes
this even
Tobias Erichsen wrote:
Hi again,
no problem. I have already started to move a good amount of the
literals into the h-file and I will try to move all I can into
value_string arrays.
But this won't be possible for everything, as MIDI itself has
some specialities already within the coding
Hi,
Good to see the dissector is improving. A couple of _add_text() calls is
oke, but the more they can be avoided the better. Problem is twofold, one
being unable to filter on them, the other that the presentation of the
overall look and feel is implemented by the core itself. Changes in that
Hi All,
find attached a patch for the Radius dissector to add statistics in
the Service Response Time menu and the tshark stats.
Regards
Alejandro
Index: config.nmake
===
--- config.nmake(revision 19652)
+++
Hi List!
Is this intentional? ;-)
Regards, ULFL
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
Here is a patch to make a few small fixes to packet-wlccp.c:
* Null terminate one of the value strings that was missing it
* Change a comment from LCC to LLC
* Change the version variable from guint to guint8 to match the packet
[it is already using tvb_get_guint8()]
Thanks,
Steve
Hi ,
I have added a plugin for a protocol which runs on top
of SUA layer. But we do not have the environment to test the plugin.
The client may provide us with a capture file but we cannot
test all the scenarios ( all the messages and packet formats) with that.
Please let me know the
Hi,
Checked in.
Thanx,
Jaap
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006, Stephen Fisher wrote:
Here is a patch to make a few small fixes to packet-wlccp.c:
* Null terminate one of the value strings that was missing it
* Change a comment from LCC to LLC
* Change the version variable from guint to guint8 to
