Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark-dev Digest, Vol 30, Issue 52

--- On Mon, 24/11/08, wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org wrote: From: wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org Subject: Wireshark-dev Digest, Vol 30, Issue 52 To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Date: Monday, 24 November, 2008,

[Wireshark-dev] range_string does not work?

Hi, I am based on Wireshark 1.0.0 on RHEL5 and Windows. Now I am suspecting the range_string does not work when it is put to hf_register_info[]. Here is my experience. I declared a range_string atttype_vals and hf_att_type. I want to add hf_att_type to tree with proto_tree_add_item().

Re: [Wireshark-dev] range_string does not work?

Hi, Is this the same as bug 2893? Stig, was this to be ported to stable? Thanx, Jaap On 7 jan 2009, at 13:41, Zhang, Long \(Roger\) zha...@alcatel-lucent.com wrote: Hi, I am based on Wireshark 1.0.0 on RHEL5 and Windows. Now I am suspecting the range_string does not work when it is

Re: [Wireshark-dev] range_string does not work?

Hi, I don't think mask (0x7) works(is implemented) for rangestrings. Regards Anders From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org on behalf of Jaap Keuter Sent: Wed 1/7/2009 2:40 PM To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] range_string

[Wireshark-dev] Help on understanding Application context in TCAP to be used by GSM MAP

Hi List, Good Evening. I have a problem with  GSM MAP Decoding.So according to the  implimentaion map rel version should be determined dynamically based on application context. I undesrstand it this way.Application conext is used if its recieved by traffic. if its recived and the call alreday

[Wireshark-dev] bug within documentation ?

Hello, trying to follow the dev guide there seems to be a mistake within wsdg_html_chunked/ChDissectAdd.html : Instead void dissect_foo(tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo, proto_tree *tree); it should be: static void dissect_foo(tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo,

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Package issue under Windows XP

Hi, I submitted a patch to Gerald allowing to build 1.0.X branch with VS2008 and VS2008EE. Wait for its delivery or switch to trunk in the meantime. Regards, Pascal. 2009/1/7 Sean yun...@yahoo.com: After modifying from VS2008 PE to EE, the installer still doesn't work. Can anyone help me on

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Package issue under Windows XP

Checked in in r27186. Sean, you'll have to get the sources from SVN or download wireshark-1.0.6pre1-27186.tar.gz or later when it shows up at http://www.wireshark.org/download/prerelease/ in the next hour or so. Pascal Quantin wrote: Hi, I submitted a patch to Gerald allowing to build 1.0.X

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (release) on Windows-XP-x86

The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-XP-x86 on Wireshark (release). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/release/builders/Windows-XP-x86/builds/2 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/release/ Buildslave for this Build: windows-xp-x86 Build Reason:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] range_string does not work?

Thanks! I tried with mask 0x0. It works. But not for 0x7. Roger From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Anders Broman Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 10:07 PM To: Developer support list for

Re: [Wireshark-dev] bug within documentation ?

On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 11:17:29AM +0100, Toralf F?rster wrote: trying to follow the dev guide there seems to be a mistake within wsdg_html_chunked/ChDissectAdd.html : Instead void dissect_foo(tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo, proto_tree *tree); it should be: static

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Package issue under Windows XP

Thanks, What's the difference in this patch? does this patch only modify several files? If so, I'd like to add patch to my 1.0.4 one, could you give me some information for the modification? Thanks again. Sean --- On Thu, 1/8/09, Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org wrote: From: Gerald Combs

[Wireshark-dev] AirPCap

Hi all, I am in a need of capturing IEEE 802.11 control packets in wireshark. I think i have no option than buying AirpCap adaptor. Has anyone tried multi-channel packet capturing with AirPCap? Further, has anyone tried Wireshark on anyother wireless technology than Wi-Fi on windows XP? Thanks in

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Package issue under Windows XP

Hi, You can review the changes here: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=27186 Thanx, Jaap Sean wrote: Thanks, What's the difference in this patch? does this patch only modify several files? If so, I'd like to add patch to my 1.0.4 one, could you give me some information

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark-dev Digest, Vol 32, Issue 9

8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3 -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url : http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/attachments/20090107/ff98bd15