Re: [Wireshark-dev] SNMPv3 auth/priv password length

All, I checked with Version 1.0.6 and there the SNMPv3 auth/priv password length check is still active. I would appreciate removing the check as it eases the test of SNMPv3 capable devices which use auth/priv passwords 8 chars. Such devices definitely exist on the market. Thanks Markus

Re: [Wireshark-dev] SNMPv3 auth/priv password length

On Mar 17, 2009, at 12:33 AM, markus.freudenber...@t-systems.com wrote: I checked with Version 1.0.6 and there the SNMPv3 auth/priv password length check is still active. That's because revision 25043 wasn't backported to any 1.0.x releases; it's only in the main SVN branch. I've added

[Wireshark-dev] convert ASCII files to Pcap files whithout using Text2pcap

Hi everybody I want to convert an ASCII file to Pcap file, without using Text2pcap, for example using Perl or another tool. I am open to any proposal Best regards -Message d'origine- De : wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] De la part de

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Hello to the list and a nested dissector

Hi, Look at GSM MAP how it can be done. You have an OID for your protocol, right? Just register that OID with a callback and you'll be handed a tvb with the data. Regards Anders -Original Message- From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 27748: /trunk/plugins/profinet/ /trunk/plugins/profinet/: Makefile.common crc16.c crc16.h moduleinfo.h moduleinfo.nmake packet-dcerpc-pn-io.c packet-pn-rt.c

2009. 03. 17, kedd keltezéssel 00.29-kor Ulf Lamping ezt írta: Joerg Mayer schrieb: On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 09:40:03PM +, u...@wireshark.org wrote: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=27748 crc16 algorithm copied from Linux sources (GPL V2 only!) So

Re: [Wireshark-dev] question related to create a statistics

Hi, Le lundi 16 mars 2009 à 13:39 +0100, Toralf Förster a écrit : Hello, for the attached dissector (https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/200902/msg00197.html) I'm wondering why the statistics doesn't work as expected. The attached tcp packet contains 2 sametime messages. The

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Win64 build support

Thanks Gerald Guy, Since http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/waterfall shows green yellow on wireshark win32 I've been downloading the latest svn compiled wireshark win32 once or twice a day for a few days now and they all seem really stable so far and even seems to be stable on my Windows

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Win64 build support

Hi Brian, As stated here (http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsdg_html_chunked/ChSetupWin32.html), you need to install cygwin and python to be able to compile Wireshark on your box. If you follow the guide, it will work flawlessly :) Regards, Pascal. 2009/3/17 Brian Daniel

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Win64 build support

Brian Daniel wrote: Thanks Gerald Guy, Since http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/waterfall shows green yellow on wireshark win32 I've been downloading the latest svn compiled wireshark win32 once or twice a day for a few days now and they all seem really stable so far and even seems to

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Win64 build support

OK, this is the part I was getting confused on... Don't use Cygwin's gcc! yet it tells me to 2.2.2. Install Cygwin Download http://www.cygwin.com/setup.exe the cygwin installer and start it. Trying it... On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Brian Daniel daniel_br...@colstate.eduwrote: Thanks

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Win64 build support

Brian Daniel wrote: OK, this is the part I was getting confused on... Don't use Cygwin's gcc! yet it tells me to 2.2.2. Install Cygwin Download http://www.cygwin.com/setup.exe the cygwin installer and start it. Trying it... Because although Cygwin is required to manage other

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Hello to the list and a nested dissector

Hi, I think I don't have such an identifier (x.y.z.a). I checked the ASN.1 definition and couldn't find any. Is there any way to create a local one just to link the tcap to this protocol? Then, as far as I understand, I should call register_ber_oid_dissector_handle passing the OID as

Re: [Wireshark-dev] WireShark filters

Hi Yonatan, You can use a display filter: (frame.time = Mar 17, 2008 14:00:00) (frame.time = Mar 17, 2008 15:00:00) If you want to see the tcp packets and not the http packets: !http tcp (frame.time = Mar 17, 2008 14:00:00) (frame.time = Mar 17, 2008 15:00:00) Regards Joan On Tue, 17 Mar

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-Win64

The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-XP-Win64 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-XP-Win64/builds/86 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: windows-xp-win64 Build

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Win64 build support

On Mar 17, 2009, at 9:25 AM, Brian Daniel wrote: CPU=IA64 So you have an Itanium machine on which you'll be running Wireshark? I don't think we have any Itanium builds of any of the libraries, just x86-64 builds. ___

Re: [Wireshark-dev] continuous packet capture

Jon, Is your goal to output directly from wireshark into a MySQL database instead of a .cap file? Then be able to generate .cap files out of the database based on date, time range, and other standard filters. Keep us posted on your progress. For now, I have to capture 40 .cap files each at 512

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Hello to the list and a nested dissector

Hi, How does the TCAP portion of your packet look? Example: Transaction Capabilities Application Part begin Source Transaction ID Transaction Id: 2DB901 oid: 0.0.17.773.1.1.1 (dialogue-as-id) dialogueRequest application-context-name: 0.4.0.0.1.0.25.2 (shortMsgMT-RelayContext-v2) : In this case the

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-x86

The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-x86 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-x86/builds/1957 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-x86 Build Reason:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Win64 build support

CPU=i386 failed also CPU=AMD64 Systems available to me: Intel E6550, 4Gig RAM, XP Pro 32-bit (wireshark win32 worked) Intel Q6600, 4Gig RAM, Windows Vista 64-bit Home Prem Intel T7500, 3Gig RAM, XP Pro 32-bit + Windows 7 beta 64-bit offline 6 pending for Windows-XP-Win64

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-ppc

The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-ppc on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-ppc/builds/722 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-ppc Build Reason:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Win64 build support

Brian Daniel wrote: CPU=i386 failed also CPU=AMD64 Systems available to me: Intel E6550, 4Gig RAM, XP Pro 32-bit (wireshark win32 worked) Intel Q6600, 4Gig RAM, Windows Vista 64-bit Home Prem Intel T7500, 3Gig RAM, XP Pro 32-bit + Windows 7 beta 64-bit offline 6 pending for

[Wireshark-dev] Decoding of GSM (G)MM-INFORMATION containing DST IE no longer works in SVN rev 27719

As can be seen from the attached .pcap file (Decode User 0 (DLT=147) as gsm_a_dtap) decoding of GSM (G)MM-INFORMATION messages containing a Daylight Saving Time IE which works in Wireshark 1.0.6 no longer works in SVN rev 27719. This seems to be caused by the introduction of the two octet length

Re: [Wireshark-dev] one possible way to speed up filtering

Hi, Le mardi 17 mars 2009 à 22:14 +0800, yami a écrit : Hi dev, I have implemented a prototype to speed up interactive filtering. The key idea is to reuse previous display information. (Is there anyone interested in this idea?) Sure, can you open a wiki page?

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Hello to the list and a nested dissector

Hi, my TCAP looks somewhat simpler: Transaction Capabilities Application Part begin Source Transaction ID Transaction Id: 4304 Components: 1 item Item: invoke (1) Data (276 bytes) so I have neither oid field nor the ACN. Do you think there is an alternative?