Hi dev,
I can not figure out why marking all packets is a useful functionality.
Could anyone kindly give some use cases?
Asking such a question is because marking all packets is really slow even if
the capture size is not that big.
If it is not that useful, or not widely used, perhaps we can
Another way to greatly speed up filtering would be to pick up and clomplete
the work to make it possible to use ep_* memory
for all field types when dissecting a packet.
When wireshark dissects a packet it performs a massive amount of
malloc()/free().
This was partially addressed when I added
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 03:08:05PM +0800, yami wrote:
I can not figure out why marking all packets is a useful
functionality. Could anyone kindly give some use cases?
You can mark all packets, then unmark certain ones before saving.
Steve
I see. Thanks!
Of course we can mark the excluded ones and save 'unmarked packets' for this
scenario, however I feel 'saving unmarked' is not intuitive for end users.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Stephen Fisher st...@stephen-fisher.comwrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 03:08:05PM +0800, yami
Hi list,
I followed the developers guide to build wireshark from trunk rev 27814 on
WinXP.
complie is running long time, so the basics should setup correctly, but then
it
fails during make of *tshark-tap-register.c*
environment:
WinXP SP3 32bit
Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 Express Edition
Python
1) is proto_x2d well initialized ?
2) why use static for your variables ?
3) take the AMIN example and modify it step by step, you will find the
problem
4) I have no idea
Olivier
Dix, Steven E a écrit :
I've been trying to get dissector plugin that I'm coding to display
subtree information
When you have filtered frames using a display filter, Mark All will mark all
the displayed items. You can then use a different diplay filter to match some
other packets, mark them and so on. Then you can save all the marked frames
without having to use a super-complex display filter to match
Mark all packets doesn't necessarily mark all packets in the capture
file. It only marks all currently displayed packets, which could be any
subset depending on the display filter applied.
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of
Andreas Heise wrote:
Hi list,
I followed the developers guide to build wireshark from trunk rev 27814
on WinXP.
complie is running long time, so the basics should setup correctly, but
then it
fails during make of *tshark-tap-register.c*
environment:
WinXP SP3 32bit
Microsoft
Hi Bill,
thanks for your reply, if I called directly from cygwin bash it's OK...
ahe...@83888ab05d01485 /cygdrive/c/wireshark
$ bash -o igncr
ahe...@83888ab05d01485 /cygdrive/c/wireshark
$ grep '^register_tap_listener_[a-z_0-9A-Z]* *(' \tap-rtp.c 2/dev/null | \
grep -v ';' | \
sed -e
yes, I always used make distclean before make all
regards,
Andreas
2009/3/22 Anders Broman a.bro...@telia.com
Did you try distclean before building, if you downloaded a tar ball?
Regards
Anders
--
*Från:* wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 08:06:55PM +0100, Jakub Zawadzki wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:12:03AM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
Warning: g_snprintf()'s function signature has an annoying botch in it
- the size argument is a gulong, not a gsize.
Not a problem in the UN*X and Windows ILP32
1) I think it is. Within my proto_register_x2d routine, I call as follows to
register:
if (-1 == proto_x2d)
{
proto_x2d = proto_register_protocol (X2D Protocol, X2D,
x2d);
}
Variable proto_x2d is a static int, initialized to -1. After the
Hi,
Le dimanche 22 mars 2009 à 02:13 +0800, yami a écrit :
Hi Didier,
Thank you for trying the patch :) and all the good comments given.
I've attached a new patch to the wiki. Please see my detailed reply
below.
- If compiled without NDEBUG defined I get a failed
Andreas Heise wrote:
Hi Bill,
thanks for your reply, if I called directly from cygwin bash it's OK...
$ bash -o igncr
$ grep '^register_tap_listener_[a-z_0-9A-Z]* *(' \tap-rtp.c 2/dev/null | \
grep -v ';' | \
sed -e 's/(.*//'
register_tap_listener_rtp_streams
$
any other
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 06:48:30PM -0400, Bill Meier wrote:
thanks for your reply, if I called directly from cygwin bash it's OK...
...
any other idea? Seems to be a problem of variables $... ?!
I'm not sure what you mean by a problem of variables $... .
I didn't follow this thread (as
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:24 AM, didier dgauthe...@magic.fr wrote:
I'll try to merge it with
http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Optimization , this version is
already able to find 2000 DNS packets inside 7 millions packets in 1
second.
Amazing!
It looks that you've done several big
17 matches
Mail list logo
