Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment

2012-01-16 Thread Graham Bloice
-Original Message- From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:wireshark-dev- boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Andriy Beregovenko Sent: 13 January 2012 23:14 To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build environment Hi Graham, Oh, this is

[Wireshark-dev] Cannot open wireshark

2012-01-16 Thread Bruce S.
I am running OSX 10.6.8 (Snow Leopard). I recently downloaded Wireshark 1.6.5 (Intel 64-bit) from the wireshark.org site. I am getting the following error when I attempt to start the application. bruce-schucks-computer:~ bschuck$ wireshark -v 2012-01-15 18:44:59.530 defaults[261:903] The

[Wireshark-dev] Registering a bug with Wireshark

2012-01-16 Thread Nitin Kalra
Hi Wireshark, I have found an issue with a packet which I am capturing through Wireshark, for this I'm trying to register a bug. But failing to do so I get username/password is not registered for Bugzilla. Please let me know how to register a case of raise a case with Wireshark development

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Registering a bug with Wireshark

2012-01-16 Thread Tony Trinh
Create an account by following the directions at https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/createaccount.cgi. On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Nitin Kalra nitin.ka...@corp.eastlink.cawrote: Hi Wireshark, I have found an issue with a packet which I am capturing through Wireshark, for this I’m

[Wireshark-dev] Dates for FOSDEM 2012: 4 5 February

2012-01-16 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 05:43:22PM +0100, Martin Kaiser wrote: Thus wrote Gerald Combs (ger...@wireshark.org): On 1/5/12 3:19 AM, Sake Blok wrote: Gerald, Are plans to meet around FOSDEM finalized? For me it would be possible to meet up during the day on Friday 3rd (after which we

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Cannot open wireshark

2012-01-16 Thread Guy Harris
On Jan 15, 2012, at 6:49 PM, Bruce S. wrote: I am running OSX 10.6.8 (Snow Leopard). I recently downloaded Wireshark 1.6.5 (Intel 64-bit) from the wireshark.org site. I am getting the following error when I attempt to start the application. ...

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 40549: /trunk/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-lpp.c packet-lte-rrc.c /trunk/epan/: CMakeLists.txt /trunk/asn1/lpp/: lpp.cnf /trunk/asn1/lte-rrc/: EUTRA-Int

2012-01-16 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 09:25:22PM +, etx...@wireshark.org wrote: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=40549 User: etxrab Date: 2012/01/16 01:25 PM Log: From Pascal Quantin: Upgrade LTE RRC dissector to v10.4.0

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 40549: /trunk/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-lpp.c packet-lte-rrc.c /trunk/epan/: CMakeLists.txt /trunk/asn1/lpp/: lpp.cnf /trunk/asn1/lte-rrc/: EUTRA-Int

2012-01-16 Thread Guy Harris
On Jan 16, 2012, at 1:36 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote: ../../asn1/lte-rrc/packet-lte-rrc-template.c:42:24: error: packet-lpp.h: No such file or directory Same thing in the buildbot. Probably a new file that didn't get checked in (it also needs to get added to epan/dissectors/Makefile.common's

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 40549: /trunk/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-lpp.c packet-lte-rrc.c /trunk/epan/: CMakeLists.txt /trunk/asn1/lpp/: lpp.cnf /trunk/asn1/lte-rrc/: EUTRA-Int

2012-01-16 Thread Pascal Quantin
Hi, Le 16/01/2012 22:36, Joerg Mayer a écrit : On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 09:25:22PM +, etx...@wireshark.org wrote: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=40549 User: etxrab Date: 2012/01/16 01:25 PM Log: From Pascal Quantin: Upgrade LTE RRC dissector to

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark ABI stability 1.6.4 - 1.6.5

2012-01-16 Thread Andrey Ponomarenko
There is also a page for the Wireshark library in the Linux upstream tracker: http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/wireshark.html It uses the latest 1.96.4 version of the abi-compliance-checker tool. I highly recommend you to update to the latest version. The file tools/git-compare-abis.sh