Hi,
I'm trying to regenerate packet-lppe.c from asn1/lppe using command:
../../tools/asn2wrs.py -p lppe -c ./lppe.cnf -s ./packet-lppe-template -D .
-O ../../epan/dissectors LPPe.asn
Regenerated version doesn't compiles:
../../asn1/lppe/packet-lppe-fn.c:868:77: error: use of undeclared
2012/9/10 Jakub Zawadzki darkjames...@darkjames.pl
Hi,
I'm trying to regenerate packet-lppe.c from asn1/lppe using command:
../../tools/asn2wrs.py -p lppe -c ./lppe.cnf -s ./packet-lppe-template
-D . -O ../../epan/dissectors LPPe.asn
Regenerated version doesn't compiles:
2012/9/10 Pascal Quantin pascal.quan...@gmail.com
2012/9/10 Jakub Zawadzki darkjames...@darkjames.pl
Hi,
I'm trying to regenerate packet-lppe.c from asn1/lppe using command:
../../tools/asn2wrs.py -p lppe -c ./lppe.cnf -s ./packet-lppe-template
-D . -O ../../epan/dissectors LPPe.asn
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 11:19:09AM +0200, Jakub Zawadzki wrote:
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 06:00:06PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
On Sep 3, 2012, at 4:35 PM, Jakub Zawadzki wrote:
I plan to replace:
typedef void (*dissector_t)(tvbuff_t *, packet_info *, proto_tree *);
typedef int
In working on bug 3534, one of the review comments was that a tree != NULL
check placed near the start of the dissector should be removed as it prevented
some of the COL_INFO/expert info data from being populated if tree was NULL.
While I agree the tree != NULL check should probably be
On Sep 10, 2012, at 7:37 PM, mman...@netscape.net wrote:
I guess I've always used the rule that simple [1] dissectors (no matter how
large) should all have the tree != NULL check before any dissection really
takes place.
Simple would also have to include no subdissectors so that you don't
