Re: [Wireshark-dev] RRC filters

2012-09-26 Thread Lucio Di Giovannantonio
Hi pascal, thank you for your resply, maybe container could be better? Regards Lucio Il 25/09/2012 16:34, Pascal Quantin ha scritto: Hi Lucio, 2012/9/25 Lucio Di Giovannantonio lucio.digiovannanto...@gmail.com mailto:lucio.digiovannanto...@gmail.com Hello to everybody, I've found

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RRC filters

2012-09-26 Thread Pascal Quantin
2012/9/25 Lucio Di Giovannantonio lucio.digiovannanto...@gmail.com Hi pascal, thank you for your resply, maybe container could be better? Regards Lucio Hi Lucio, thanks for your suggestion, I like it. I will wait a few days to see if someone suggests a better wording (or a better approach

Re: [Wireshark-dev] RRC filters

2012-09-26 Thread Anders Broman
Pascal Quantin skrev 2012-09-26 19:41: 2012/9/25 Lucio Di Giovannantonio lucio.digiovannanto...@gmail.com mailto:lucio.digiovannanto...@gmail.com Hi pascal, thank you for your resply, maybe container could be better? Regards Lucio Hi Lucio, thanks for your suggestion, I

[Wireshark-dev] packet-ieee80211.c

2012-09-26 Thread mmann78
While trying to remove calls, I came across some curious code in packet-ieee80211.c ___ Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev

Re: [Wireshark-dev] packet-ieee80211.c

2012-09-26 Thread mmann78
(sorry about the previous email; trigger happy enter key) While trying to remove decode_numeric_bitfield() calls, I came across some curious code in packet-ieee80211.c. hf_ieee80211_block_ack_control_multi_tid_info and hf_ieee80211_block_ack_control_compressed_tid_info both use