Hi pascal, thank you for your resply, maybe container could be better?
Regards
Lucio
Il 25/09/2012 16:34, Pascal Quantin ha scritto:
Hi Lucio,
2012/9/25 Lucio Di Giovannantonio lucio.digiovannanto...@gmail.com
mailto:lucio.digiovannanto...@gmail.com
Hello to everybody, I've found
2012/9/25 Lucio Di Giovannantonio lucio.digiovannanto...@gmail.com
Hi pascal, thank you for your resply, maybe container could be better?
Regards
Lucio
Hi Lucio,
thanks for your suggestion, I like it. I will wait a few days to see if
someone suggests a better wording (or a better approach
Pascal Quantin skrev 2012-09-26 19:41:
2012/9/25 Lucio Di Giovannantonio lucio.digiovannanto...@gmail.com
mailto:lucio.digiovannanto...@gmail.com
Hi pascal, thank you for your resply, maybe container could be
better?
Regards
Lucio
Hi Lucio,
thanks for your suggestion, I
While trying to remove calls, I came across some curious code in
packet-ieee80211.c
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
(sorry about the previous email; trigger happy enter key)
While trying to remove decode_numeric_bitfield() calls, I came across some
curious code in packet-ieee80211.c.
hf_ieee80211_block_ack_control_multi_tid_info and
hf_ieee80211_block_ack_control_compressed_tid_info both use