You don't have Kerberos enabled (HAVE_KERBEROS).
By the way using an explicit --with-kerberos should throw a
configure error if Kerberos isn't found, so I don't know what is
going on there.
There's a warning I haven't realized when running configure:
---
$./configure --with-kerberos
Hi Guy,
Thanks for your answer! It seems that the header switch based on operation
mode switch is quite reasonable. I think I will make Npcap follow it.
And I still have some additional questions.
First there's a little background here: Npcap uses a build-time
configuration to choose whether
On 04/19/2016 05:17 AM, Graham Bloice wrote:
On 18 April 2016 at 22:48, Guy Harris > wrote:
On Apr 18, 2016, at 2:16 PM, Graham Bloice
>
wrote:
> What should we do
On 19-04-2016 20:53, João Valverde wrote:
On 19-04-2016 20:38, Uli Heilmeier wrote:
Hi list,
since commit 3c1f71e my build system has failed in compiling the
current master.
The error is:
CC packet-dcerpc-rep_proc.lo
packet-dcerpc-netlogon.c: In function
Or
#ifdef HAVE_KERBEROS
#define _U_IF_NO_KERBEROS_
#else
#define _U_IF_NO_KERBEROS_ _U_
#endif
...
static guint32 get_keytab_as_list(md4_pass **p_pass_list, const
char* ntlm_pass _U_IF_NO_KERBEROS_ )
or maybe
On 19-04-2016 21:02, Alexis La Goutte wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 9:53 PM, João Valverde
> wrote:
On 19-04-2016 20:38, Uli Heilmeier wrote:
Hi list,
since commit 3c1f71e my build system has
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 9:53 PM, João Valverde <
joao.valve...@tecnico.ulisboa.pt> wrote:
>
>
> On 19-04-2016 20:38, Uli Heilmeier wrote:
>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> since commit 3c1f71e my build system has failed in compiling the current
>> master.
>>
>> The error is:
>>
>>
>>CC
On 19-04-2016 20:38, Uli Heilmeier wrote:
Hi list,
since commit 3c1f71e my build system has failed in compiling the current master.
The error is:
CC packet-dcerpc-rep_proc.lo
packet-dcerpc-netlogon.c: In function 'get_keytab_as_list':
packet-dcerpc-netlogon.c:6561:71: error:
On Apr 19, 2016, at 7:07 AM, Yang Luo wrote:
> I want to know does this 3) option make any sense to anyone? How does Linux
> handle this? I want to keep the same behavior with Linux.
What Linux does for mac80211 drivers (which I think the majority of drivers
are) is
On Apr 19, 2016, at 7:09 AM, Yang Luo wrote:
> Someone told me that:
> • could you please automatically provide Ethernet pseudo-headers rather
> than Radiotap etc. when the WLAN NIC is switched to "managed" (STA) mode? The
> point is that Wireshark doesn't dissect
Hi,
The build fails for me on SUSE 11.3
/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.3/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld:
skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libc.a when searching for -lc
ui/gtk/libgtkui.a(gui_utils.o): In function `window_icon_realize_cb':
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 8:35 PM, Dario Lombardo wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Yang Luo wrote:
>
>>
>> I found I can push using https, but the reminds me it lacks change-id.
>>
>> I'm not sure I got your point, but you can get rid
Someone told me that:
- could you please automatically provide Ethernet pseudo-headers rather
than Radiotap etc. when the WLAN NIC is switched to "managed" (STA) mode?
The point is that Wireshark doesn't dissect frames whose 802.11 header
indicates some Data subtypes (probably
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Yang Luo wrote:
>
> I found I can push using https, but the reminds me it lacks change-id.
>
> I'm not sure I got your point, but you can get rid of all change-id issues
using the tools/pre-commit hook.
Read here
I used git-review too, it is provide by Python on Windows. All I need to do
is to commit via SmartGit and then type in "git-review".
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:52 PM, Graham Bloice
wrote:
> I find using the git-review (
>
I find using the git-review (
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Gerrit/git-review) tool simplifies a lot of
Gerrit\git interactions.
On 19 April 2016 at 12:44, Yang Luo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I found I can push using https, but the reminds me it lacks change-id.
> I fnished
Hi all,
I found I can push using https, but the reminds me it lacks change-id.
I fnished cloning via https and got this done:)
My patch is:
https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/15003/
Thanks for your help!
Cheers,
Yang
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Dario Lombardo
To push using ssh (that is one of the two methods supported) you have to
upload your public key to gerrit using the web interface. Next to the http
section, you can find the ssh one. Use it to upload the key.
You can push using http and its password. Simply replace the ssh url with
the https one.
Hi Dario,
I got this error.
J:\github_repos\wireshark>git push ssh://
yang...@code.wireshark.org:29418/wireshark
HEAD:refs/for/master/dot11-support-on-windows
Permission denied (publickey).
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
Please make sure you have the correct access rights
and the
Hi Alexis,
Cloning using https seems to be faster than ssh, nearly 90KB/s. I have
generated the HTTP password. Let' see if it can finish..
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Alexis La Goutte wrote:
> Hi Yang,
>
> Do you have try to clone via https ? (using Gerrit) :
Hi Yang
You can clone from github, then add whatever git remote you want. But you
don't need to do that, since the command to push a change to gerrit can be
issued to point directly to wireshark repo. As stated here
https://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsdg_html_chunked/ChSrcContribute.html you
can push
On 18 April 2016 at 22:48, Guy Harris wrote:
> On Apr 18, 2016, at 2:16 PM, Graham Bloice
> wrote:
>
> > What should we do about the lex files? Guy's last comment on this issue
> was
> >
> > Some "generated" code is "generated" by copying it from
Hi Yang,
Do you have try to clone via https ? (using Gerrit) : git clone
https://yang...@code.wireshark.org/review/wireshark (may be you need to
generated a HTTP password on Gerrit Option)
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Yang Luo wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I want to submit a
Hi list,
I want to submit a patch to Wireshark. I'm using SmartGit on Win10. My
location is Beijing. I followed the guide here:
https://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/SubmittingPatches
And I always fails this step:
git clone ssh://yang...@code.wireshark.org:29418/wireshark
Because the speed is
Hi Jakub,
We are always interesting by code contribution
to get review of core/dev, the better is to push your code on Gerrit, you
can add WIP (work in progress) flag on commit message if the code is
"experimental".
Cheers
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Jakub Mazur
Hi Alan,
Often the code is freeze to end of May for next major release.
it will be a announce in -dev mailing when the planning will be finish.
Cheers
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Alan Partis
wrote:
> I noted the comments yesterday that v2.2 will likely be
26 matches
Mail list logo