[Wireshark-dev] Embedding external program into wireshark menu

2016-07-13 Thread Raj
Hello friends, We have a packet capturing application product. we have developed a tool in which we first get the captured packet data ( pcap file based on metadata information provided in query) and provided a button on the GUI of the tool to open the retrieved packet data (pcap file) in

[Wireshark-dev] checksum standardization

2016-07-13 Thread Michael Mann
There has been discussion over the years about standardizing the way checksums are handled in Wireshark. A lot of the discussion has been captured in bug 8859 [1], and I started writing a patch that would address it [2]. In developing the patch, I came across the following types of checksum

Re: [Wireshark-dev] build warnings

2016-07-13 Thread João Valverde
On 07/14/2016 02:44 AM, Michael Mann wrote: I've done some investigation into the build warnings generated by the Ubuntu and Windows buildbots. I thought I'd highlight some of the "big offenders" so that if anyone has good ideas on how to fix them, it may lead to thinning the forest out

[Wireshark-dev] build warnings

2016-07-13 Thread Michael Mann
I've done some investigation into the build warnings generated by the Ubuntu and Windows buildbots. I thought I'd highlight some of the "big offenders" so that if anyone has good ideas on how to fix them, it may lead to thinning the forest out enough that we can see trees (and the raw number

Re: [Wireshark-dev] LUA Comparative Times

2016-07-13 Thread Jeff Morriss
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Paul Offord wrote: > Hi, > > > > I recently measured some load and filter times with and without a LUA > postdissector plugin called TRANSUM. I tried three different scenarios: > > > > ·No LUA - without any plugins other than

[Wireshark-dev] LUA Comparative Times

2016-07-13 Thread Paul Offord
Hi, I recently measured some load and filter times with and without a LUA postdissector plugin called TRANSUM. I tried three different scenarios: *No LUA - without any plugins other than those shipped as standard *Bypassed LUA - with TRANSUM but a preference set so that on

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Parsing partial IPv6 prefix - newbie question

2016-07-13 Thread Alexis La Goutte
Hi Tomek, On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Tomek Mrugalski < tomasz.mrugal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi! > > Long time user, first time trying to extend the code and would like to > ask for a bit of guidance. I'm trying to extend DHCPv6 (packet-dhcpv6.c) > dissector to support RFC7598. Couple

[Wireshark-dev] Parsing partial IPv6 prefix - newbie question

2016-07-13 Thread Tomek Mrugalski
Hi! Long time user, first time trying to extend the code and would like to ask for a bit of guidance. I'm trying to extend DHCPv6 (packet-dhcpv6.c) dissector to support RFC7598. Couple options in that RFC uses new option format that stores IPv6 prefix as two fields: 1. prefix-len (1 octet,