Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Season of Docs] Congratulations on successfully completing your project

2021-03-31 Thread RAGE
Thanks, Peter <3 we had a release at work, so I was focusing there.. will continue helping with the docs as I already told you. Will check out info about Wireshark fest as well. luvluv Alex On Wed, Mar 31, 2021, 23:29 Peter Wu wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Thank you for your contributions to the

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Season of Docs] Congratulations on successfully completing your project

2021-03-31 Thread Graham Bloice
I would really like to see more of Alex's art at SharkFest, maybe on T-shirts or mugs, I think attendees would love it. On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 at 22:29, Peter Wu wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Thank you for your contributions to the documentation! Some components > have been undocumented for a while. You

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Failed pipeline for nvmeof_getlog_page | wireshark | 3a8e09ef

2021-03-31 Thread João Valverde via Wireshark-dev
gitlab.com/constg2021/wireshark On 31/03/21 21:00, Gerald Combs wrote: Hi Constantine, You receivied the failure notice because: - You pushed a commit to gitlab.com/constg2021/wireshark. Was this for a merge request for wireshark/wireshark? From GitLab's perspective it dosen't matter.

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Season of Docs] Congratulations on successfully completing your project

2021-03-31 Thread Peter Wu
Hi Alex, Thank you for your contributions to the documentation! Some components have been undocumented for a while. You did a good job trying to track down relevant subject matter experts and doing some research on your own, despite not being familiar in the area. The results are visible on

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Failed pipeline for nvmeof_getlog_page | wireshark | 3a8e09ef

2021-03-31 Thread Gerald Combs
Hi Constantine, You receivied the failure notice because: - You pushed a commit to gitlab.com/constg2021/wireshark. Was this for a merge request for wireshark/wireshark? From GitLab's perspective it dosen't matter. constg2021/wireshark is a separate project. - CI/CD is enabled in

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Qt link errors (Q_INIT_RESOURCE)

2021-03-31 Thread Gerald Combs
I was able to replicate this using an opensuse/leap:42.3 docker image with a default build environment, which includes CMake 3.5.2 and Qt 5.6.2. I also installed various CMake versions and got the following results: CMake 3.5.2: CMake succeeded, ninja failed CMake 3.8.2: CMake succeeded, ninja

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Failed pipeline for nvmeof_getlog_page | wireshark | 3a8e09ef

2021-03-31 Thread Constantine Gavrilov
Ronnie: Thank you for taking your time to reply. I think you entirely missed my point. The question was not regarding how to fix but about significance of this build test. I saw my previous merge requests approved and even merged when this test failed. I then saw it post factum, and

[Wireshark-dev] overzealous tcpros_tcp detection

2021-03-31 Thread Marek 'MMx' Ludha
Hi, Yesterday I've spent some time figuring out why the http2_tcp heuristic dissector wasn't working on my particular pcap. Turns out the reason is that tcpros_tcp was claiming the data before http_tcp could get a turn (http2_tcp is registered under http despite the _tcp in the name). In

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Qt link errors (Q_INIT_RESOURCE)

2021-03-31 Thread Martin Mathieson via Wireshark-dev
cmake --version cmake version 3.5.2 qmake-qt5 --version QMake version 3.0 Using Qt version 5.6.2 in /usr/lib64 This is an old VM that will be retired in around a month when a new machine arrives. At the very end of running cmake I was getting this: - Configuring done Warning: Source file

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Failed pipeline for nvmeof_getlog_page | wireshark | 3a8e09ef

2021-03-31 Thread ronnie sahlberg
It seems like you already know what is wrong and how to solve this. Why not just change your patch so it does not trigger this compiler error/warning? Maybe the compiler is overly sensitive here? Who knows. Why is this a problem for wireshark developers? Do this: * fix your code so it does not

[Wireshark-dev] Failed pipeline for nvmeof_getlog_page | wireshark | 3a8e09ef

2021-03-31 Thread Constantine Gavrilov
I have a question regarding for a special form of automatic builds that I do not understand. Occasionally, I get an email for additional pipeline build that is different from default pipeline linked to the ticket. It is a wider set of compilers and distributions. Several questions: What is