Re: [Wireshark-dev] seeking advice on how to reconcile two packet captures

2023-08-28 Thread Josh Clark
Sure, I can take a look. On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 14:07 Brian Reichert wrote: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 08:54:39AM -0700, Josh Clark wrote: > > Personally, as long as there are no firewalls, proxies, or NATs in the > way, > > I would hash together source IP, destination IP, source port,

Re: [Wireshark-dev] SCTP statistics

2023-08-28 Thread John Thacker
The statistics mentioned here? https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/issues/16367 The comments there suggest that the Enable Association Indexing preference has to be on for the SCTP stats to work. John On Mon, Aug 28, 2023, 10:19 AM Jaap Keuter wrote: > Hi, > > Who knows what the current

Re: [Wireshark-dev] seeking advice on how to reconcile two packet captures

2023-08-28 Thread Brian Reichert
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 08:54:39AM -0700, Josh Clark wrote: > Personally, as long as there are no firewalls, proxies, or NATs in the way, > I would hash together source IP, destination IP, source port, destination > port, and IP ID. As I feared, ip.id doesn't work in my case. My two captures are

Re: [Wireshark-dev] seeking advice on how to reconcile two packet captures

2023-08-28 Thread Brian Reichert
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 11:57:54AM -0500, chuck c wrote: > https://github.com/corelight/community-id-spec > "When processing flow data from a variety of monitoring applications (such > as Zeek and Suricata), it's often desirable to pivot quickly from one > dataset to another." > > A Community ID

Re: [Wireshark-dev] seeking advice on how to reconcile two packet captures

2023-08-28 Thread Brian Reichert
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 08:54:39AM -0700, Josh Clark wrote: > How controlled will the network be between the two capture locations? Are > there any firewalls, load balancers, proxies, NATs, or anything like that? No NAT, just evidence of latency we need to nail down. > If none of those are the

Re: [Wireshark-dev] seeking advice on how to reconcile two packet captures

2023-08-28 Thread chuck c
https://github.com/corelight/community-id-spec "When processing flow data from a variety of monitoring applications (such as Zeek and Suricata), it's often desirable to pivot quickly from one dataset to another." A Community ID implementation for Wireshark.

Re: [Wireshark-dev] seeking advice on how to reconcile two packet captures

2023-08-28 Thread Josh Clark
How controlled will the network be between the two capture locations? Are there any firewalls, load balancers, proxies, NATs, or anything like that? If there are, then whatever correlation you do will have to factor in the specific configuration and device characteristics. If none of those are

[Wireshark-dev] seeking advice on how to reconcile two packet captures

2023-08-28 Thread Brian Reichert
This question isn't specific to Wireshark, but I couldn't find a good forum. By all means, I'm open to suggestions as to where it would be more appropriate to ask about this. Anyway: I'm trying to automate the reconciliation of a pair of packet captures of a TCP session. This is sort of a

[Wireshark-dev] SCTP statistics

2023-08-28 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, Who knows what the current status of the SCTP statistics is? I’ve tried a few files, but couldn’t make sense of it. It looked like information was missing or not filled at all. Thanks, Jaap Send from my iPhone ___