On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 2:15 AM Uli Heilmeier wrote:
> Am 05.08.20 um 19:06 schrieb Richard Sharpe:
> >> As discussed in the last Remote Developer Den meeting I see a Code of
> Conduct (CoC) as helpful for our community.
> >
> > Why? Nothing is broken at the moment, so nothing needs fixing,
Am 05.08.20 um 19:06 schrieb Richard Sharpe:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 8:49 AM Uli Heilmeier wrote:
Thanks for your feedback Richard!
>> As discussed in the last Remote Developer Den meeting I see a Code of
>> Conduct (CoC) as helpful for our community.
>
> Why? Nothing is broken at the
I agree,
The samba one is much more comfortable.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 3:07 AM Richard Sharpe
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 8:49 AM Uli Heilmeier wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > As discussed in the last Remote Developer Den meeting I see a Code of
> > Conduct (CoC) as helpful for our
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 8:49 AM Uli Heilmeier wrote:
>
> All,
>
> As discussed in the last Remote Developer Den meeting I see a Code of Conduct
> (CoC) as helpful for our community.
Why? Nothing is broken at the moment, so nothing needs fixing, AFAICT.
I would suggest the following alternative
All,
As discussed in the last Remote Developer Den meeting I see a Code of Conduct
(CoC) as helpful for our community.
I've always felt comfortable and welcome in the Wireshark community. But I'm a
white old man so my view may have some bias.
I propose that we adopt the "Contributor Covenant"
