Hello!
I just added (with revision 32202) a new dissector plugin: INTERLINK (yes, I
know, a too general name but that's what it is called by BMW). This protocol is
used in BMW cars (real and simulated) for all kinds of gadget communication
(for example to and from the combination display or the
Hi,
Well, it broke the build so you may want to check into that.
Also the design desision to make it a plugin is a poor one. Single
file dissectors should be added to the build in set, otherwise we
would drown in the maintenane of all these 'little used' plugins.
Thanks,
Jaap
Send from my
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 08:16:44AM +0100, Dr. Uwe Girlich wrote:
I just added (with revision 32202) a new dissector plugin: INTERLINK (yes, I
know, a too general name but that's what it is called by BMW). This protocol
is
used in BMW cars (real and simulated) for all kinds of gadget
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 08:16:44AM +0100, Dr. Uwe Girlich wrote:
I just added (with revision 32202) a new dissector plugin: INTERLINK (yes, I
know, a too general name but that's what it is called by BMW). This protocol
is
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:06:25 +0100
From: Jaap Keuter jaap.keu...@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] INTERLINK dissector plugin added
To: Developer support list for Wireshark wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Message-ID: 98f0fbc3-9e06-4f42-bcb9-5c098deb9...@xs4all.nl
Content-Type
Aniruddha A aniruddh...@gmail.com wrote:
How to decide whether a dissector has to be a plugin or a build-in ?
Is it based on the code size ?
I have also created a plugin (based on a protocol which is in draft
state in IETF)
and the code size is small, I was about to raise patch request on
