Re: [Wireshark-dev] Win64 build support

2009-03-17 Thread Brian Daniel
Thanks Gerald Guy, Since http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/waterfall shows green yellow on wireshark win32 I've been downloading the latest svn compiled wireshark win32 once or twice a day for a few days now and they all seem really stable so far and even seems to be stable on my Windows

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Win64 build support

2009-03-17 Thread Pascal Quantin
Hi Brian, As stated here (http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsdg_html_chunked/ChSetupWin32.html), you need to install cygwin and python to be able to compile Wireshark on your box. If you follow the guide, it will work flawlessly :) Regards, Pascal. 2009/3/17 Brian Daniel

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Win64 build support

2009-03-17 Thread Graham Bloice
Brian Daniel wrote: Thanks Gerald Guy, Since http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/waterfall shows green yellow on wireshark win32 I've been downloading the latest svn compiled wireshark win32 once or twice a day for a few days now and they all seem really stable so far and even seems to

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Win64 build support

2009-03-17 Thread Brian Daniel
OK, this is the part I was getting confused on... Don't use Cygwin's gcc! yet it tells me to 2.2.2. Install Cygwin Download http://www.cygwin.com/setup.exe the cygwin installer and start it. Trying it... On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Brian Daniel daniel_br...@colstate.eduwrote: Thanks

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Win64 build support

2009-03-17 Thread Graham Bloice
Brian Daniel wrote: OK, this is the part I was getting confused on... Don't use Cygwin's gcc! yet it tells me to 2.2.2. Install Cygwin Download http://www.cygwin.com/setup.exe the cygwin installer and start it. Trying it... Because although Cygwin is required to manage other

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Win64 build support

2009-03-17 Thread Guy Harris
On Mar 17, 2009, at 9:25 AM, Brian Daniel wrote: CPU=IA64 So you have an Itanium machine on which you'll be running Wireshark? I don't think we have any Itanium builds of any of the libraries, just x86-64 builds. ___

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Win64 build support

2009-03-17 Thread Brian Daniel
CPU=i386 failed also CPU=AMD64 Systems available to me: Intel E6550, 4Gig RAM, XP Pro 32-bit (wireshark win32 worked) Intel Q6600, 4Gig RAM, Windows Vista 64-bit Home Prem Intel T7500, 3Gig RAM, XP Pro 32-bit + Windows 7 beta 64-bit offline 6 pending for Windows-XP-Win64

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Win64 build support

2009-03-17 Thread Gerald Combs
Brian Daniel wrote: CPU=i386 failed also CPU=AMD64 Systems available to me: Intel E6550, 4Gig RAM, XP Pro 32-bit (wireshark win32 worked) Intel Q6600, 4Gig RAM, Windows Vista 64-bit Home Prem Intel T7500, 3Gig RAM, XP Pro 32-bit + Windows 7 beta 64-bit offline 6 pending for

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Win64 build support

2009-03-11 Thread Gerald Combs
You should now, along with updating SVN. I just checked in a change to use WIRESHARK_TARGET_PLATFORM (note the fixed spelling) instead of PLATFORM. Config.nmake sets CPU according to WIRESHARK_TARGET_PLATFORM. You shouldn't have to set it yourself. Brian Daniel wrote: Yep, turns out I need to

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Win64 build support

2009-03-11 Thread Brian Daniel
Cool thanks folks! Since http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/waterfall shows failed on both wireshark win32 and win64, I'll hold off on my svn update until later tonight when both are green. On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Gerald Combs ger...@wireshark.org wrote: You should now, along with

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Win64 build support

2009-03-10 Thread Brian Daniel
Thanks Gerald! Where is the list of CPU abbreviation codes? such as AMD64? I didn't think it would care about the CPU since I've currently left it selected CPU=win32. I'm currently on a Core2 Duo CPU E6550 running XP Pro SP3 Once this works on win32 (known to usually work), I'll also try this on

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Win64 build support

2009-03-10 Thread Guy Harris
On Mar 10, 2009, at 2:34 PM, Brian Daniel wrote: config.nmake(63) : fatal error U1050: Your mysterious moon-man architecture BPC frightens and confuses us. Make sure that nothing sets PLATFORM to BPC:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Win64 build support

2009-03-10 Thread Gerald Combs
Guy Harris wrote: On Mar 10, 2009, at 2:34 PM, Brian Daniel wrote: config.nmake(63) : fatal error U1050: Your mysterious moon-man architecture BPC frightens and confuses us. Make sure that nothing sets PLATFORM to BPC:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Win64 build support

2009-03-10 Thread Guy Harris
On Mar 10, 2009, at 5:08 PM, Gerald Combs wrote: Should we use something more Wireshark-specific, e.g. WIRESHRK_TARGET_PLATFORM instead? That might work better. When Googling for information about this I found at least a couple of instances of some annoying bit of software insisting

[Wireshark-dev] Win64 build support

2009-03-06 Thread Gerald Combs
I just checked in a change which adds preliminary support for 64-bit (x86-64) compilation on Windows. You can enable 64-bit compilation by setting PLATFORM=win64. Due to the version of Lua in wireshark-win64-libs repository you'll probably have to use Visual C++ 2008. A lot of changes were made