Re: [Wireshark-dev] packet-kerberos.c: hand-written or ASN.1?

2010-01-27 Thread ronnie sahlberg
packet-kerberos.c is handwritten. packet-kerberos contains a whoole lot more than just rfc1510 (it even handles a pre rfc version of 1510 with a slightly different asn, used by packetcable) The vast majority of the code in apcket-kerberos.c is not really the actual pdu definitions as of 1510

Re: [Wireshark-dev] packet-kerberos.c: hand-written or ASN.1?

2010-01-27 Thread ronnie sahlberg
ouch, it is partially machinegenerated! when did that happen ? :-) On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 7:30 PM, ronnie sahlberg ronniesahlb...@gmail.com wrote: packet-kerberos.c is handwritten. packet-kerberos contains a whoole lot more than just rfc1510 (it even handles a pre rfc version of 1510

Re: [Wireshark-dev] packet-kerberos.c: hand-written or ASN.1?

2010-01-27 Thread Anders Broman
changing the signatures. Regards Andsers -Original Message- From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org on behalf of ronnie sahlberg Sent: Wed 1/27/2010 9:30 AM To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] packet-kerberos.c: hand-written or ASN.1? ouch

[Wireshark-dev] packet-kerberos.c: hand-written or ASN.1?

2010-01-26 Thread Stephen Fisher
I've started working with Kerberos at work, and I was analyzing packets with Wireshark when I noticed that a number of the packet detail field names are pretty terse. Is packet-kerberos.c written by hand, generated with ASN.1 or both? I'm guessing both. Is there a move to change it to