Hi,
Sounds good to me.
Thanx,
Jaap
Kukosa, Tomas wrote:
Does it make sense to do all those sanity checks only if a special
command-line flag is supplied to TShark, so that the checks
are done as
part of the build process, rather than being done every
time you run
Wireshark or TShark?
It seems that we have reached critical number of protocols.
I have met collision of built in p7 protoco with my private nu
protocol. They both have the same g_str_hash() value.
Does it make sence to create hash from the protocol filter name which
has usually 2-4 characters?
BTW the
Kukosa, Tomas wrote:
It seems that we have reached critical number of protocols.
I have met collision of built in p7 protoco with my private nu
protocol. They both have the same g_str_hash() value.
Does it make sence to create hash from the protocol filter name
which has usually 2-4
Instead of creating a hash and store it in a hashtable
wouldnt it be better/faster to just store the names as the strings as
is in a se-tree instead.
That should be much faster.
On Nov 21, 2007 8:13 AM, Guy Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kukosa, Tomas wrote:
It seems that we have reached
or rather a pe-tree
On Nov 21, 2007 9:45 AM, ronnie sahlberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead of creating a hash and store it in a hashtable
wouldnt it be better/faster to just store the names as the strings as
is in a se-tree instead.
That should be much faster.
On Nov 21, 2007 8:13 AM,
Guy Harris wrote:
Kukosa, Tomas wrote:
It seems that we have reached critical number of protocols.
I have met collision of built in p7 protoco with my private nu
protocol. They both have the same g_str_hash() value.
Does it make sence to create hash from the protocol filter name
which
