Joerg Mayer wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 08:01:50PM -0700, Stephen Fisher wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 07:47:35PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
The alternative is to compile with -std=c99 for the long long case, but
do we really want to do that? I agree that -pedantic is a bit too much
to
Hi List!
I'm currently looking at the warnings that are triggered by the files
generated by idl2eth files.
An example would be (plugins/giop):
packet-coseventcomm.c
packet-coseventcomm.c(139) : warning C4101: 'be' : unreferenced local
variable
packet-coseventcomm.c(140) : warning C4101:
This should put an end to the buildbot lamenting about files that are
not being considered as mpeg files.
However I'm certain I was way too conservative when choosing what's a
MPEG file (I had just MP3s),
please add more types if you are aware of them.
On 3/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
List,
I have done some largish changes to the usb dissector to make it work
again after the switch to DLT189.
The dissector now decodes for example usm_memory_stick.pcap and other
such traces properly.
Please test and comment. I have also checked in USB support for
conversations and hostlist
Some changes slipped through without me noticing:
Good thing: changes to asn1/ranap, that were commited already with
packet-ranap.[ch]
Neutral thing: changes to makefiles of asn1/snmp and asn1/h248 to add
a target to test compilation.
No bad things
Luis
On 3/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
First I think that it is not really feasible to change the DLT type again.
Looking at traces from the current DLT189 and the updated (and now
functional) usb dissector there are a few observations.
The pseudoheader given to the dissector lacks several useful fields
which would make life
This patch enables packet-usb.c to display all descriptors in the GET
CONFIGURATION request, regardless of whether we know how to decode
them. (All descriptors in that request share the same first two
bytes.)
It also adds the HID descriptor type (not the report descriptor,
though - that is
We probably want to add this to wiretap/configure.in also..
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 12:32:15AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=21195
User: morriss
Date: 2007/03/26 12:32 AM
Log:
If we're using gcc, try to use
Thanks Charles.
Checked in.
I have a big patch to the dissector I am going to try to merge piece
by piece over the next few days. This will result in many smallish
patches.
Since you are also working on patches to packet-usb.c can I ask you
to send small patches and frequently so that none
On 3/25/07, ronnie sahlberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a big patch to the dissector I am going to try to merge piece
by piece over the next few days. This will result in many smallish
patches.
Since you are also working on patches to packet-usb.c can I ask you
to send small patches
Oops, forgot to do that, thanks for the reminder. (It's done now.)
Stephen Fisher wrote:
We probably want to add this to wiretap/configure.in also..
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 12:32:15AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=21195
On 3/25/07, Charles Lepple [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/25/07, ronnie sahlberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modulo changing the DLT value AGAIN the only three possibilities I see are:
As far as I can tell, the code that creates pcap files with DLT 186
and 189 is still in CVS. For the swapped
On 3/26/07, Charles Lepple [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/25/07, ronnie sahlberg
The usb dissector is currently divided into two files
packet-usb.c and packet-usb-masstorage.c
My idea was to have packet-usb.c only contain the core part of the
protocol (and maybe also the HUB stuff) while
Between August and October of 2006, I submitted three patches for
packet-ppp.c. These corrected problems I had encountered in researching
a problem for my employer. This problem involved RFC 2508 protocol
between two routers.
In resolving this problem, I developed a partial RFC 2508
[EMAIL PROTECTED] trunk]$ echo yes | gcc -E -Wfoodeclaration-after-statement -
# 1
yes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] trunk]$ gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/2.96/specs
gcc version 2.96 2731 (Red Hat Linux 7.1 2.96-81)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] trunk]$
It appears it only looks at the
Dont worry.
Ill rewrite it so that it tries to compile a real file.
On 3/26/07, ronnie sahlberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] trunk]$ echo yes | gcc -E -Wfoodeclaration-after-statement -
# 1
yes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] trunk]$ gcc -v
Reading specs from
This add-on macro claims to do what you need:
ax_cflags_gcc_option
Check whether GCC supports the given option.
http://autoconf-archive.cryp.to/ax_cflags_gcc_option.html
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 06:32:32AM +, ronnie sahlberg wrote:
Dont worry.
Ill rewrite it so that it tries to
I just checked in a different test for configure.in in trunk that works for me.
Please review.
On 3/26/07, Jeff Morriss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm, that's weird, it works for me.
What version of GCC are you using?
What does:
echo yes | gcc -E -Wfoodeclaration-after-statement -
18 matches
Mail list logo
